A Markov random field-based Bayesian model to identify genes with differential methylation

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Xiao [1 ]
Gu, Jinghua [1 ]
Xuan, Jianhua [1 ]
Clarke, Robert [2 ]
Hilakivi-Clarke, Leena [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Bradley Dept Elect & Comp Engn, 900 N Glebe Rd, Arlington, VA 22203 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Med Ctr, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC 20057 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
differential methylation events; dependency structure; Markov random field; Bayesian framework; Gibbs sampling; significance test; DNA; MICROARRAY; EPIGENETICS; RESOLUTION; PACKAGE; DISEASE; ARRAYS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The rapid development of biotechnology makes it possible to explore genome-wide DNA methylation mapping which has been demonstrated to be related to diseases including cancer. However, it also posts substantial challenges in identifying biologically meaningful methylation pattern changes. Several algorithms have been proposed to detect differential methylation events, such as differentially methylated CpG sites and differentially methylated regions. However, the intrinsic dependency of the CpG sites in a neighboring area has not yet been fully considered. In this paper, we propose a novel method for the identification of differentially methylated genes in a Markov random field-based Bayesian framework. Specifically, we use Markov random field to model the dependency of the neighboring CpG sites, and then estimate the differential methylation score of the CpG sites in a Bayesian framework through a sampling scheme. Finally, the differential methylation statuses of the genes are determined by the estimated scores of the involved CpG sites. In addition, significance test is conducted to assess the significance of the identified differentially methylated genes. Experimental results on both synthetic data and real data demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method in identifying genes with differential methylation patterns under different conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Markov Random field approach to Bayesian speaker adaptation
    Shahshahani, BM
    1996 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1-6, 1996, : 697 - 700
  • [32] A Markov random field approach to Bayesian speaker adaptation
    Shahshahani, BM
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SPEECH AND AUDIO PROCESSING, 1997, 5 (02): : 183 - 191
  • [33] Cauchy Markov random field priors for Bayesian inversion
    Jarkko Suuronen
    Neil K. Chada
    Lassi Roininen
    Statistics and Computing, 2022, 32
  • [34] Markov Random Field-Based Layer Separation for Simulated X-Ray Image Sequences
    Fischer, Peter
    Pohl, Thomas
    Maier, Andreas
    Hornegger, Joachim
    BILDVERARBEITUNG FUR DIE MEDIZIN 2015: ALGORITHMEN - SYSTEME - ANWENDUNGEN, 2015, : 329 - 334
  • [35] MICROWAVE IMAGING BASED ON A MARKOV RANDOM-FIELD MODEL
    CAORSI, S
    GRAGNANI, GL
    MEDICINA, S
    PASTORINO, M
    ZUNINO, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1994, 42 (03) : 293 - 303
  • [36] Segmentation of SAR images based on Markov random field model
    Lankoande, O
    Hayat, MM
    Santhanam, B
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOL 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 2956 - 2961
  • [37] Image Segmentation Based on Evidential Markov Random Field Model
    Zhang, Zhe
    Han, Deqiang
    Yang, Yi
    FOURTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND INFORMATION SCIENCES (CCAIS 2015), 2015, : 239 - 244
  • [38] A Markov random field based multi-band model
    Gravier, G
    Sigelle, M
    Chollet, G
    2000 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ACOUSTICS, SPEECH, AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, PROCEEDINGS, VOLS I-VI, 2000, : 1619 - 1622
  • [39] TEXTURE SEGMENTATION BASED ON A HIERARCHICAL MARKOV RANDOM FIELD MODEL
    HU, RM
    FAHMY, MM
    SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1992, 26 (03) : 285 - 305
  • [40] CONDITIONAL RANDOM FIELD-BASED MESH SALIENCY
    Song, Ran
    Liu, Yonghuai
    Zhao, Yitian
    Martin, Ralph R.
    Rosin, Paul L.
    2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING (ICIP 2012), 2012, : 637 - 640