A conceptual model for the integration of social and ecological information to understand human-wildlife interactions

被引:124
|
作者
Lischka, Stacy A. [1 ,2 ]
Teel, Tara L. [3 ]
Johnson, Heather E. [4 ,7 ]
Reed, Sarah E. [2 ,5 ]
Breck, Stewart [6 ]
Carlos, Andrew Don [5 ]
Crooks, Kevin R. [2 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Res Policy & Planning Branch, 317 W Prospect Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[2] Colorado State Univ, Dept Fish Wildlife & Conservat Biol, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Human Dimens Nat Resources, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] Colorado Pk & Wildlife, Res Policy & Planning Branch, 415 Turner Dr, Durango, CO 81301 USA
[5] Wildlife Conservat Soc, Amer Program, 2300 Southern Blvd, Bronx, NY 10460 USA
[6] USDA, Natl Wildlife Res Ctr, Wildlife Serv, 4101 Laporte Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80521 USA
[7] US Geol Survey, Alaska Sci Ctr, 410 Univ Dr, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
关键词
Social-ecological systems; Black bears; Carnivores; Social science; Human-bear conflict; Colorado; BLACK BEARS; CONSERVATION; CONFLICT; PERCEPTIONS; SCIENCE; MANAGEMENT; SELECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.020
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
There is growing recognition that interdisciplinary approaches that account for both ecological and social processes are necessary to successfully address human-wildlife interactions. However, such approaches are hindered by challenges in aligning data types, communicating across disciplines, and applying social science information to conservation actions. To meet these challenges, we propose a conceptual model that adopts a social-ecological systems approach and integrates social and ecological theory to identify the multiple, nested levels of influence on both human and animal behavior. By accounting for a diverse array of influences and feedback mechanisms between social and ecological systems, this model fulfills a need for approaches that treat social and ecological processes with equal depth and facilitates a comprehensive understanding of the drivers of human and animal behaviors that perpetuate human-wildlife interactions. We apply this conceptual model to our work on human-black bear conflicts in Colorado, USA to demonstrate its utility. Using this example, we identify key lessons and offer guidance to researchers and conservation practitioners for applying integrated approaches to other human-wildlife systems.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 87
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Using social network methodological approach to better understand human-wildlife interactions
    Patru-Stupariu, Ileana
    Nita, Andreea
    Mustatea, Mihai
    Huzui-Stoiculescu, Alina
    Furst, Christine
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 99
  • [2] Social and ecological dimensions are needed to understand human-wildlife conflict in subsistence farming context
    Yeshey, Rodney J.
    Keenan, Rodney J.
    Ford, Rebecca M.
    Nitschke, Craig R.
    PEOPLE AND NATURE, 2024, 6 (06) : 2602 - 2617
  • [3] Human-wildlife interactions
    Rosell, C.
    Llimona, F.
    ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2012, 35 (02) : 219 - 220
  • [4] Improving human-wildlife interactions by resolving human-wildlife conflicts
    Messmer, Terry A.
    HUMAN-WILDLIFE INTERACTIONS, 2018, 12 (03): : 305 - 306
  • [5] Linking human and ecological components to understand human-wildlife conflicts across landscapes and species
    Teixeira, Lucas
    Tisovec-Dufner, Karina Campos
    Marin, Gabriela de Lima
    Marchini, Silvio
    Dorresteijn, Ine
    Pardini, Renata
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2021, 35 (01) : 285 - 296
  • [6] Human-nature relationships: An introduction to social-ecological practice theory for human-wildlife interactions
    Orrick, Kaggie
    Dove, Michael
    Schmitz, Oswald J.
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (02) : 201 - 211
  • [7] Using visual-based social norm methods to understand distance-related human-wildlife interactions
    Miller, Zachary D.
    Freimund, Wayne
    HUMAN DIMENSIONS OF WILDLIFE, 2018, 23 (02) : 176 - 186
  • [8] A conceptual framework to evaluate human-wildlife interactions within coupled human and natural systems
    Morzillo, Anita T.
    de Beurs, Kirsten M.
    Martin-Mikle, Chelsea J.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2014, 19 (03):
  • [9] Human-wildlife interactions in urban ecosystems
    Soulsbury, Carl D.
    White, Piran C. L.
    WILDLIFE RESEARCH, 2015, 42 (07) : III - V
  • [10] Human-wildlife interactions in urban Asia
    Wierucka, Kaja
    Hatten, Chloe E. R.
    Murphy, Derek
    Allcock, John A.
    Andersson, Astrid A.
    Bojan, Jack W. N.
    Kong, Tsz Ching
    Kwok, Jun Kin
    Lam, Jack Y. K.
    Ma, Calvin H.
    Phalke, Sagarika
    Tilley, Hannah B.
    Wang, Rebecca S.
    Wang, Yifu
    Webster, Sam J.
    Mumby, Hannah S.
    Dingle, Caroline
    GLOBAL ECOLOGY AND CONSERVATION, 2023, 46