Local land supply and fiscal incentives for R&D: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

被引:14
|
作者
Liu, Yuanyuan [1 ]
Liu, Guanchun [2 ]
Zhang, Chengsi [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Foreign Studies, Sch Finance, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Lingnan Coll, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Renmin Univ China, Sch Finance, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Renmin Univ China, China Financial Policy Res Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Land resource curse; Fiscal incentives; Research and development; China; Quasi-natural experiment; ECONOMIC-GROWTH EVIDENCE; FINANCIAL CONSTRAINTS; INNOVATION EVIDENCE; TAX INCENTIVES; DECENTRALIZATION; GOVERNMENT; PERFORMANCE; COMPETITION; REFORMS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.chieco.2021.101630
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Whereas numerous studies have evaluated the effects of public research and development (R&D) support programs and R&D tax incentives on private R&D, little is known about local governments' fiscal incentives for R&D. In this study, we build a conceptual framework to clarify the critical role of local land supply in relation to fiscal expenditure on R&D. We treat the establishment of China's nine Land Supervision Bureaus in 2006 as a quasi-natural experiment, and run a difference-in-differences regression to identify causality. The results show that local governments allocate more fiscal expenditure to R&D in response to land-use supervision, which monitors illegal land granting behaviors, and this effect is stronger in cities where leaders have higher political career incentives and cities with greater fiscal decentralization. Moreover, we find that land-use supervision increases the probability and scale of firms' access to government subsidies for R & D; thus, enhancing regional innovation capacity. Our findings document that China's land resource is a curse for its innovation-driven growth as it impedes local governments' fiscal incentives for R&D.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Selective industrial policy and overcapacity: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Ge, Pengfei
    Zhu, Rui
    Chen, Yize
    Huang, Xiulu
    [J]. ECONOMIC SYSTEMS, 2024, 48 (03)
  • [22] How does supply chain digitization affect green innovation? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Luo, Shuangcheng
    Xiong, Zhiqiao
    Liu, Jianjiang
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 136
  • [23] Executive equity incentives and opportunistic manager behavior: new evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Nienhaus, Martin
    [J]. REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING STUDIES, 2022, 27 (04) : 1276 - 1318
  • [24] Environmental Regulation and Firm Exports: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China
    Zhang, Li
    Liu, Yuhai
    Hu, Jin-Li
    Liu, Tiebin
    Liao, Sainan
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [25] Corruption and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Kong, Dongmin
    Shu, Yijia
    Wang, Yanan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASIAN ECONOMICS, 2021, 75
  • [26] The political economy of firm emissions: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Kong, Dongmin
    Ma, Guangyuan
    Qin, Ni
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2022, 75
  • [27] Tax enforcement and corporate employment: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China
    Liu, Guanchun
    Liu, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Chengsi
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2022, 73
  • [28] Making Reform Work: Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in Rural China
    Fang, Wang
    Xiao, Ma
    Shuo, Chen
    [J]. CHINA-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2021, 19 (02) : 25 - 46
  • [29] Dissipative Competition: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment
    Chang, Yuk Ying
    Young, Martin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCE, 2015, 15 (02) : 169 - 198
  • [30] Supply chain digitization and corporate maturity mismatch: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment
    Du, Yifei
    Li, Wen
    Tang, Xuesong
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2024, 87