Physicians' understanding of the regulation of dietary supplements

被引:49
|
作者
Ashar, Bimal H. [1 ]
Rice, Tasha N. [1 ]
Sisson, Stephen D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archinte.167.9.966
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: After passage of the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act, herbs and other supplements were allowed to be sold to the public without Food and Drug Administration ( FDA) approval or premarket evaluation. Data suggest that many people are unaware of this lack of governmental oversight and may rely on their physicians for education in this arena. This study was designed to evaluate physicians' level of understanding of dietary supplement regulation and the adverse event reporting process and to determine whether an interactive online curriculum could aid in improving knowledge. Methods: A multicenter online educational intervention was developed and administered to physicians at 15 internal medicine residency programs throughout the United States between March 1, 2006, and June 30, 2006. Pretest performance was used to measure baseline knowledge, while posttest performance compared with pretest performance measured the effectiveness of the educational intervention. Results: A total of 335 physicians completed the module. Ninety percent of those completing the module were residents, while 10% were attending physicians. Baseline knowledge of dietary supplement regulatory issues was poor. The total average pretest score was only 59% ( 986/1675). The average score rose to 91% ( 1526/1675) after completion of the curriculum ( P < .001). With regard to specific content areas, about one third of physicians were unaware that dietary supplements did not require FDA approval or submission of safety and efficacy data before being marketed. Similar percentages believed that there are regulations in place to ensure supplement quality. Most physicians were unaware that serious adverse events due to the use of supplements should be reported through the FDA MedWatch system. Conclusions: Physician knowledge of dietary supplement regulation and adverse event reporting is poor. An online didactic module may improve knowledge and potentially enhance patient-physician communication regarding the use of such products.
引用
收藏
页码:966 / 969
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Regulation of dietary supplements in the United States of America
    Dvorkin, L
    Gardiner, PM
    CLINICAL RESEARCH AND REGULATORY AFFAIRS, 2003, 20 (03) : 313 - 325
  • [32] Regulation of dietary supplements: Five years of DSHEA
    Khatcheressian, LAW
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 1999, 54 (04) : 623 - 644
  • [33] The regulation of dietary supplements from medicinal mushrooms
    Wasser, SP
    Nevo, E
    Sokolov, D
    Timor, M
    Reshetnikov, SV
    SCIENCE AND CULTIVATION OF EDIBLE FUNGI, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2000, : 789 - 801
  • [34] Regulation of Herbal Dietary Supplements: Is There a Better Way?
    Zakaryan, Annet
    Martin, Irwin G.
    DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2012, 46 (05): : 532 - 544
  • [35] Americans' views on the use and regulation of dietary supplements
    Blendon, RJ
    DesRoches, CM
    Benson, JM
    Brodie, M
    Altman, DE
    ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (06) : 805 - 810
  • [36] Navigating the Maze of Dietary Supplements Regulation and Safety
    O'Dwyer, Darla Daniel
    Vegiraju, Sujatha
    TOPICS IN CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2020, 35 (03) : 248 - 263
  • [38] Proportionality in Public Health Regulation: The Case of Dietary Supplements
    Resnik D.B.
    Food Ethics, 2018, 2 (1) : 1 - 16
  • [39] Problems and Prospects: Public Health Regulation of Dietary Supplements
    Binns, Colin W.
    Lee, Mi Kyung
    Lee, Andy H.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 39, 2018, 39 : 403 - 420
  • [40] Regulation of dietary supplements: FDA's strategic plan
    Levitt, JA
    FOOD AND DRUG LAW JOURNAL, 2002, 57 (01) : 1 - 13