Diclofenac Versus Dexamethasone Following Strabismus Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Alsaif, Abdulmalik [1 ]
Karam, Mohammad [1 ]
Al-Naseem, Abdulrahman [2 ]
Almuhanna, Abdulredha [1 ]
Aldubaikhi, Ahmed [3 ]
Aljebreen, Meshaal [3 ]
Alfreihi, Shatha [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Sch Med, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Sch Med Sci, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] King Saud bin Abdulaziz Univ Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Abdullah Specialist Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Minist Natl Guards, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] King Abdullah Int Med Res Ctr, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
strabismus; diclofenac; dexamethasone; inflammation; chemosis; intraocular pressure; RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL; CORTICOSTEROIDS; EFFICACY; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1089/jop.2020.0133
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare outcomes of diclofenac versus dexamethasone in patients after strabismus surgery. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A search was conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMCARE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the outcomes of diclofenac versus dexamethasone poststrabismus surgery were included. An extraction spreadsheet for data collection and Review Manager 5.3 were used for data analysis based on the fixed and random effects models. Discomfort, inflammation, chemosis, conjunctival gap, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were primary outcome measures. Secondary outcomes included conjunctival congestion and injection, discharge, and drop intolerance. Fixed and random effects models were used for the analysis. Results: Five RCTs enrolling 248 subjects were enrolled. At week 2 postoperatively, there was a significant difference favoring diclofenac over dexamethasone in terms of discomfort (mean difference [MD] = -0.37, P = 0.02), conjunctival inflammation (MD = -0.16, P = 0.02), conjunctival chemosis (MD = -0.16, P = 0.04), and postoperative conjunctival gap (MD = -0.17, P = 0.002). In terms of IOP, there were no significant differences. However, no statistically significant differences were noted at weeks 1 and 4 postoperatively. For secondary outcomes, dexamethasone had significantly improved conjunctival congestion; however, diclofenac had significantly less injection at the site of muscle attachments at week 2. No significant difference was noted in terms of discharge and drop intolerance. Conclusion: Diclofenac is comparable to dexamethasone when used following strabismus surgery. However, a significant difference favoring diclofenac in terms of discomfort, inflammation, conjunctival chemosis, and conjunctival gap was only noted at 2 weeks postoperatively. The authors suggest conducting further studies to support the effectiveness of diclofenac as an alternative to corticosteroids following strabismus surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:343 / 353
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Perioperative intravenous dexamethasone for patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tyler McKechnie
    Geoffrey Elder
    Simarpreet Ichhpuniani
    Andrew T. Chen
    Kathleen Logie
    Aristithes Doumouras
    Dennis Hong
    Randy Benko
    Cagla Eskicioglu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 38
  • [42] The efficacy of methylprednisolone versus dexamethasone in reducing postoperative sequelae after third molar surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Madhoon, Hossam Waleed
    Al-Kafarna, Mohammed
    Ayyad, Nirmeen Jehad
    Gbreel, Mohamed Ibrahim
    Zaazouee, Mohamed Sayed
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04) : 365 - 374
  • [43] Robotic surgery versus open surgery for thyroid neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hanghang Liu
    Yue Wang
    Chenzhou Wu
    Wei Fei
    En Luo
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2020, 146 : 3297 - 3312
  • [44] Robotic surgery versus open surgery for thyroid neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liu, Hanghang
    Wang, Yue
    Wu, Chenzhou
    Fei, Wei
    Luo, En
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 146 (12) : 3297 - 3312
  • [45] Efficacy of tetracaine eye drops in strabismus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Almekhyal, Naser
    Alotaibi, Salman
    Alenezi, Zayed
    Almutairi, Salman
    Alharbi, Fahad
    Alrtam, Mohammad
    STRABISMUS, 2023, 31 (03) : 210 - 219
  • [46] Global and regional prevalence of strabismus: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hashemi, Hassan
    Pakzad, Reza
    Heydarian, Samira
    Yekta, Abbasali
    Aghamirsalim, Mohamadreza
    Shokrollahzadeh, Fereshteh
    Khoshhal, Fahimeh
    Pakbin, Mojgan
    Ramin, Shahroukh
    Khabazkhoob, Mehdi
    STRABISMUS, 2019, 27 (02) : 54 - 65
  • [47] Enteral versus parenteral nutrition following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Adiamah, Alfred
    Ranat, Reesha
    Gomez, Dhanwant
    HPB, 2019, 21 (07) : 793 - 801
  • [48] Short versus long DAPT following PCI, a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rozemeijer, Rik
    Voskuil, Michiel
    Stella, Pieter
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 70 (18) : B226 - B227
  • [49] Virtual Versus Conventional Planning in Orthognathic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Strujak, Guilherme
    Marliere, Daniel Amaral Alves
    Medeiros, Yuri de Lima
    Guariza Filho, Odilon
    Carlini, Joao Luiz
    Westphalen, Vania Portela Ditzel
    JOURNAL OF MAXILLOFACIAL & ORAL SURGERY, 2024, 23 (02): : 219 - 228
  • [50] Piezoelectric versus conventional techniques for orthognathic surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alrefai, Mohamad
    Daboul, Ahmad
    Fleischhacker, Boris
    Landes, Constantin
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2022, 123 (05) : E273 - E278