An injury risk curve for the hip for use in frontal impact crash testing

被引:12
|
作者
Rupp, Jonathan D. [1 ,2 ]
Flannagan, Carol A. C. [1 ]
Kuppa, Shashi M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Transportat Res Inst, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Emergency Med, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Natl Highway Traff Safety Adm US, Washington, DC 20590 USA
关键词
Hip fracture; Crash-test dummy; Hybrid III; Injury criteria; Survival analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.09.038
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
To facilitate the assessment of hip injury risk in frontal motor-vehicle crashes, all injury risk curve that relates peak force transmitted to the hip to the probability of hip fracture was developed by using survival analysis to fit a lognormal distribution to a recently published dataset of hip fracture forces. This distribution was parameterized to account for the effect of subject stature. which was the only Subject characteristic found to significantly affect hip fracture force (X(2)(1)=6.03, p=0.014). The distribution was further parameterized to account for the effects of hip flexion and abduction from a standard driving Posture on hip fracture force using relationships between mean hip fracture force and hip flexion/abduction reported in the literature. The resulting parametric distribution was used to define relationships between force applied to the hip and the risk of hip fracture for the statures associated with the small female, midsize male, and large male crash-test dummies, thus allowing these dummies to assess hip fracture/dislocation risk in frontal crashes, provided that such dummies are sufficiently biofidelic. For the midsize male crash test dummy, a 50% risk of hip fracture was associated with a force of 6.00 kN. For the small female and large male dummies, a 50% risk of hip fracture Was associated with forces of 4.46 and 6.73 kN, respectively. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 531
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimated crash injury risk and crash characteristics for motorsport drivers
    Patalak, John P.
    Harper, Matthew G.
    Weaver, Ashley A.
    Dalzell, Nicole M.
    Stitzel, Joel D.
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 136 (136):
  • [22] Alcohol Use Problems and Crash Injury
    Vaca, Federico
    Kohl, Andras
    Kohl, Vanessa
    ADVANCED EMERGENCY NURSING JOURNAL, 2006, 28 (01) : 48 - +
  • [23] Marijuana use and car crash injury
    Blows, S
    Ivers, RQ
    Connor, J
    Ameratunga, S
    Woodward, M
    Norton, R
    ADDICTION, 2005, 100 (05) : 605 - 611
  • [24] Optimal occupant kinematics and crash pulse for automobile frontal impact
    Cheng, Zhiqing
    Pellettiere, Joseph A.
    Crandall, Jeff R.
    Pilkey, Walter D.
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2009, 16 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [25] Methodology for estimating thoracic impact response in frontal crash tests
    Thor, Craig P.
    Gabler, Hampton C.
    Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation, Vol 43, 2007, 43 : 336 - 341
  • [26] Stochastic analysis of the variation in injury numbers of automobile frontal crash tests
    Kim, T. -W.
    Jeong, H. -Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 11 (04) : 481 - 488
  • [27] Driver Injury Risk Variability in Finite Element Reconstructions of Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) Frontal Motor Vehicle Crashes
    Gaewsky, James P.
    Weaver, Ashley A.
    Koya, Bharath
    Stitzel, Joel D.
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2015, 16 : S124 - S131
  • [28] Stochastic analysis of the variation in injury numbers of automobile frontal crash tests
    T. -W. Kim
    H. -Y. Jeong
    International Journal of Automotive Technology, 2010, 11 : 481 - 488
  • [29] Injury Responses of the Dummy Based on Chinese Anthropometric Data in Frontal Crash
    Yan L.
    Xie W.
    Xu W.
    Cao L.
    Dai H.
    Zhang K.
    Qiche Gongcheng/Automotive Engineering, 2019, 41 (03): : 289 - 297
  • [30] Injury probability and risk in frontal crashes: Effects of sorting techniques on priorities for offset testing
    Buzeman, DG
    Viano, DC
    Lovsund, P
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1998, 30 (05): : 583 - 595