Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture - A prospective, randomized trial

被引:158
|
作者
Gardner, MJ [1 ]
Brophy, RH [1 ]
Demetrakopoulos, D [1 ]
Koob, J [1 ]
Hong, R [1 ]
Rana, A [1 ]
Lin, JT [1 ]
Lane, JM [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.D.02289
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Treatment of osteoporosis following a hip fracture has been notoriously poor. Many efforts have been made to improve treatment rates. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a perioperative inpatient intervention program, involving patient education and providing a list of questions for the primary care physician, increased the percentage of patients in whom osteoporosis was addressed following a hip fracture. Methods: A prospective, randomized trial involving eighty patients who had been admitted to an academic medical center with a low-energy hip fracture was conducted. During their hospitalization, the study group patients were engaged in a fifteen-minute discussion regarding the association between osteoporosis and hip fractures, the efficacy of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scans in the diagnosis of osteoporosis and of bisphosphonates in its treatment, and the importance of medical follow-up for osteoporosis management. These patients were also provided with five questions regarding osteoporosis treatment to be given to their primary medical physician, and they were reminded about the questions during a follow-up telephone call six weeks later. The patients in the control group received a brochure describing methods for preventing falls. Both groups were contacted by telephone at six months after discharge to determine whether osteoporosis had been addressed. Positive indicators of intervention included assessment of bone mineral density with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and initiation of antiresorptive therapy. Results: The average age in each group was eighty-two years, and 78% of the patients were female. Four patients in each group did not survive through the six-month follow-up period and were excluded from the trial. Fifteen (42%) of the thirty-six patients who had been randomized to the study group, compared with only seven (19%) of the thirty-six patients in the control group, had their osteoporosis addressed by their primary physician. This difference between the groups was significant (p = 0.036). Conclusions: Patients who were provided with information and questions for their primary care physician about osteoporosis were more likely to receive appropriate therapeutic intervention than were patients who had not received the information and questions. Orthopaedic surgeons have a unique opportunity to improve the rate of osteoporosis treatment in the perioperative period following a hip fracture by educating patients and directing them toward channels for long-term osteoporosis management. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level I. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 7
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improvement in the undertreatment of osteoporosis following hip fracture
    Gardner, MJ
    Flik, KR
    Mooar, P
    Lane, JM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (08): : 1342 - 1348
  • [32] Use of a Decision Aid to Improve Treatment Decisions in Osteoporosis: The Osteoporosis Choice Randomized Trial
    Montori, Victor M.
    Shah, Nilay D.
    Pencille, Laurie J.
    Branda, Megan E.
    Van Houten, Holly K.
    Swiglo, Brian A.
    Kesman, Rebecca L.
    Tulledge-Scheitel, Sidna M.
    Jaeger, Thomas M.
    Johnson, Ruth E.
    Bartel, Gregory A.
    Melton, L. Joseph, III
    Wermers, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 124 (06): : 549 - 556
  • [33] Telecarers improve osteoporosis treatment and compliance rates in secondary osteoporosis prevention for elderly hip fracture patients
    Gani, Linsey
    Tan, Francine
    King, Thomas
    SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 64 (04) : 244 - +
  • [34] How much do rheumatologists make a difference?: Two strategies to improve treatment of osteoporosis following fragility hip fracture
    Boire, G
    Cabana, F
    De Brum-Fernandes, AJ
    Liang, P
    Robindaine, J
    Hercelin, D
    Deschênes, I
    Roux, S
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 : 348 - +
  • [35] Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
    Catherine M. Said
    Marisa Delahunt
    Andrew Hardidge
    Paul Smith
    Phong Tran
    Luke McDonald
    Emmanuel Kefalianos
    Cathy Daniel
    Sue Berney
    BMC Geriatrics, 21
  • [36] Recumbent cycling to improve outcomes in people with hip fracture: a feasibility randomized trial
    Said, Catherine M.
    Delahunt, Marisa
    Hardidge, Andrew
    Smith, Paul
    Tran, Phong
    McDonald, Luke
    Kefalianos, Emmanuel
    Daniel, Cathy
    Berney, Sue
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01) : 394
  • [37] Osteoporosis Screening and Treatment Following Hip Fracture in Male Veterans: A Retrospective Analysis
    Karim, Shabana
    Sanders, Suzanne
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2008, 58 (12): : 3991 - 3992
  • [38] Can early hip fracture surgery improve physical function following fragility fracture in elderly patients with osteoporosis?
    Choi, Jun Hwan
    Yoo, Soyeon
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2023, 38 : 308 - 308
  • [39] A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture
    Cuddihy, MT
    Amadio, PC
    Gabriel, SE
    Pankratz, VS
    Kurland, RL
    Melton, LJ
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 15 (09) : 695 - 700
  • [40] A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture
    Maria-Teresa Cuddihy
    Peter C. Amadio
    Sherine E. Gabriel
    V. Shane Pankratz
    Robert L. Kurland
    L. Joseph Melton
    Osteoporosis International, 2004, 15 : 695 - 700