Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Testing: Reliability in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

被引:13
|
作者
Greenwalt, Nicole L. [1 ,2 ]
Patterson, Jessie N. [2 ]
Rodriguez, Amanda, I [2 ,3 ]
Fitzpatrick, Denis [2 ]
Gordon, Katherine R. [2 ]
Janky, Kristen L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, 555N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2021年 / 42卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Adolescents; Bone conduction; hildren; Vestibular; estibular evoked myogenic potential;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000925
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Bone conduction vibration (BCV) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) are clinically desirable in children for multiple reasons. However, no accepted standard exists for stimulus type and the reliability of BCV devices has not been investigated in children. The objective of the current study was to determine which BCV VEMP method (B-71, impulse hammer, or Mini-shaker) yields the highest response rates and reliability in a group of adults, adolescents, and children. It was hypothesized that the Mini-shaker would yield the highest response rates and reliability because it provides frequency specificity, higher output levels without distortion, and the most consistent force output as compared to the impulse hammer and B-71. Design: Participants included 10 child (ages 5 to 10), 11 adolescent (ages 11 to 18), and 11 young adult (ages 23 to 39) normal controls. Cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) were measured in response to suprathreshold air-conducted, 500 Hz tone bursts and 3 types of BCV (B-71, impulse hammer, and Mini-shaker) across 2 test sessions to assess reliability. Results: For cVEMP, response rates were 100% for all methods in all groups with the exception of the adult group in response to the impulse hammer (95%). For oVEMP, response rates varied by group and BCV method. For cVEMP, reliability was highest in adults using the Mini-shaker, in adolescents using the impulse hammer, and in children using the B-71. For oVEMP, reliability was highest in adults using the Mini-shaker, in adolescents using the Mini-shaker or impulse hammer, and in children using the impulse hammer. Age positively correlated with air-conducted oVEMP amplitude, but not cVEMP amplitude or cVEMP corrected amplitude. Age negatively correlated with all BCV VEMP amplitudes with the exception of cVEMP corrected amplitude in response to the Mini-shaker. Conclusions: All BCV methods resulted in consistent cVEMP responses (response rates 95 to 100%) with at least moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >= 0.5) for all groups. Similarly, all BCV methods resulted in consistent oVEMP responses (89 to 100%) with at least moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >= 0.5) except for the B-71 in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 363
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multifrequency Analysis of Masseter Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Young Adults
    Arkadi, Mugdha
    Neupane, Anuj Kumar
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2023, 32 (04) : 843 - 852
  • [42] The vestibular evoked myogenic potential: A test-retest reliability study
    Maes, Leen
    Vinck, Bart M.
    De Vel, Eddy
    D'haenens, Wendy
    Bockstael, Annelies
    Keppler, Hannah
    Philips, Birgit
    Swinnen, Freya
    Dhooge, Ingeborg
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (03) : 594 - 600
  • [43] The Effect of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Children
    Li, Xin
    Gong, Shusheng
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2020, 130 (12): : E918 - E925
  • [44] Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing as an Objective Measure of Vestibular Stimulation With Cochlear Implants
    Parkes, William J.
    Gnanasegaram, Joshua J.
    Cushing, Sharon L.
    McKnight, Carmen L.
    Papsin, Blake C.
    Gordon, Karen A.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (02): : E75 - E81
  • [45] Considerations when Analyzing Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Outcomes Elicited by Chirp Stimulus in Healthy Participants
    Zakaria, Mohd Normani
    Zainun, Zuraida
    Aw, Cheu Lih
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2015, 11 (03): : 271 - +
  • [46] Ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) reveals mesencephalic HTLV-1-associated neurological disease
    Silva, Tatiana Rocha
    Labanca, Ludimila
    de Morais Caporali, Julia Fonseca
    Rocha Santos, Marco Aurelio
    de Resende, Luciana Macedo
    Scoralick Dias, Rafael Teixeira
    Goncalves, Denise Utsch
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (12):
  • [47] Improving vestibular evoked myogenic potential reliability by using a blood pressure manometer
    Vanspauwen, R
    Wuyts, FL
    Van de Heyning, PH
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2006, 116 (01): : 131 - 135
  • [48] Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential testing for assessment of vestibular functions in cochlear implant patients
    Qiao, Xiao-Feng
    Li, Xin
    Wang, Wei-Xing
    Zheng, Wei
    Li, Tong-Li
    ARTIFICIAL ORGANS, 2020, 44 (04) : 428 - 434
  • [49] Effects of Stimulus and Recording Parameters on the Air Conduction Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential
    Murnane, Owen D.
    Akin, Faith W.
    Kelly, J. Kip
    Byrd, Stephanie
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2011, 22 (07) : 469 - 480
  • [50] Considerations when Analyzing Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Outcomes Elicited by Chirp Stimulus in Healthy Participants Reply
    Ozgur, Abdulkadir
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ADVANCED OTOLOGY, 2015, 11 (03): : 272 - 272