Bone Conduction Vibration Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Testing: Reliability in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults

被引:13
|
作者
Greenwalt, Nicole L. [1 ,2 ]
Patterson, Jessie N. [2 ]
Rodriguez, Amanda, I [2 ,3 ]
Fitzpatrick, Denis [2 ]
Gordon, Katherine R. [2 ]
Janky, Kristen L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] Boys Town Natl Res Hosp, 555N 30th St, Omaha, NE 68131 USA
[3] Univ Nebraska, Lincoln, NE USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2021年 / 42卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Adolescents; Bone conduction; hildren; Vestibular; estibular evoked myogenic potential;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000000925
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: Bone conduction vibration (BCV) vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP) are clinically desirable in children for multiple reasons. However, no accepted standard exists for stimulus type and the reliability of BCV devices has not been investigated in children. The objective of the current study was to determine which BCV VEMP method (B-71, impulse hammer, or Mini-shaker) yields the highest response rates and reliability in a group of adults, adolescents, and children. It was hypothesized that the Mini-shaker would yield the highest response rates and reliability because it provides frequency specificity, higher output levels without distortion, and the most consistent force output as compared to the impulse hammer and B-71. Design: Participants included 10 child (ages 5 to 10), 11 adolescent (ages 11 to 18), and 11 young adult (ages 23 to 39) normal controls. Cervical VEMP (cVEMP) and ocular VEMP (oVEMP) were measured in response to suprathreshold air-conducted, 500 Hz tone bursts and 3 types of BCV (B-71, impulse hammer, and Mini-shaker) across 2 test sessions to assess reliability. Results: For cVEMP, response rates were 100% for all methods in all groups with the exception of the adult group in response to the impulse hammer (95%). For oVEMP, response rates varied by group and BCV method. For cVEMP, reliability was highest in adults using the Mini-shaker, in adolescents using the impulse hammer, and in children using the B-71. For oVEMP, reliability was highest in adults using the Mini-shaker, in adolescents using the Mini-shaker or impulse hammer, and in children using the impulse hammer. Age positively correlated with air-conducted oVEMP amplitude, but not cVEMP amplitude or cVEMP corrected amplitude. Age negatively correlated with all BCV VEMP amplitudes with the exception of cVEMP corrected amplitude in response to the Mini-shaker. Conclusions: All BCV methods resulted in consistent cVEMP responses (response rates 95 to 100%) with at least moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >= 0.5) for all groups. Similarly, all BCV methods resulted in consistent oVEMP responses (89 to 100%) with at least moderate reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient >= 0.5) except for the B-71 in adults.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 363
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) test-retest reliability in adults
    Obeidat, Faten S.
    Alghwiri, Alia A.
    Bell, Steven L.
    JOURNAL OF VESTIBULAR RESEARCH-EQUILIBRIUM & ORIENTATION, 2024, 34 (01): : 39 - 48
  • [2] Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Test-retest Reliability in Children
    Fuemmeler, Elizabeth
    Rodriguez, Amanda, I
    Thomas, Megan
    Creutz, Tom
    Fitzpatrick, Denis
    Janky, Kristen L.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2020, 41 (08) : E1052 - E1059
  • [3] Mapping the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP)
    Colebatch, James G.
    JOURNAL OF VESTIBULAR RESEARCH-EQUILIBRIUM & ORIENTATION, 2012, 22 (01): : 27 - 32
  • [4] The vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) in the assessment of vestibular function
    Zabaneh, Samira Ira
    Stoelzel, Katharina
    Olze, Heidi
    Dommerich, Steffen
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2022, 101 (08) : 636 - 637
  • [5] Clinical application of vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP)
    Murofushi, Toshihisa
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2016, 43 (04) : 367 - 376
  • [6] Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (VEMP's) in Children
    Reza-Zadeh, Nima
    Ahadi, Mohsen
    Talebi, Hossein
    Gharib, Masoud
    Yazdani, Nasrin
    Shahrokhi, Amin
    ARCHIVES OF REHABILITATION, 2011, 11 : 21 - 25
  • [7] Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential (VEMP) Testing for Diagnosis of Superior Semicircular Canal Dehiscence
    Noij, Kimberley S.
    Rauch, Steven D.
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [8] Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) in patients with acoustic neuromas
    Takeichi, N
    Sakamoto, T
    Fukuda, S
    Inuyama, Y
    AURIS NASUS LARYNX, 2001, 28 : S39 - S41
  • [9] A simple model for the generation of the vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP)
    Wit, HP
    Kingma, CM
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (06) : 1354 - 1358
  • [10] The Vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) in peripheral vestibular vestibulopathy: usefulness in lateralization
    Kim, W-K.
    Kim, M-J.
    Shin, J-H.
    Lee, J-H.
    Song, H-K.
    Kwon, K. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2009, 16 : 430 - 430