Ototoxicity and cochlear sparing in children with medulloblastoma: Proton vs. photon radiotherapy

被引:37
|
作者
Paulino, Arnold C. [1 ]
Mahajan, Anita [1 ]
Ye, Rong [2 ]
Grosshans, David R. [1 ]
Okcu, M. Fatih [3 ,4 ]
Su, Jack [3 ,4 ]
McAleer, Mary Frances [1 ]
McGovern, Susan [1 ]
Mangona, Victor A. [1 ]
Chintagumpala, Murali [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1515 Holcombe Blvd,Box 97, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Texas Childrens Canc Ctr, Houston, TX USA
[4] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Ototoxicity; Medulloblastoma; Proton therapy; Intensity modulated radiation therapy; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; RISK MEDULLOBLASTOMA; DISEASE-CONTROL;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2018.01.002
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare ototoxicity rates between medulloblastoma patients treated with protons vs. photons. Materials and methods: The study included 84 children diagnosed with medulloblastoma treated with either passively scattered protons (n = 38) or photons (n = 46). Patients underwent maximal safe resection followed by craniospinal irradiation, posterior fossa and/or tumor bed boost and chemotherapy according to one of 3 multi-institutional trials. Median audiogram follow-up was 56 months for protons and 66 months for photons. Results: Mean cochlear dose (D-mc) was lower in patients treated with protons for both standard (p < 0.0001) and high-risk disease (p < 0.001). Grade 3 and 4 ototoxicity was seen in 7 of 75 (9.3%) and 9 of 91 (9.9%) ears (Brock, p = 0.91), 13 of 75 (17.3%) and 19 of 91 (20.9%) ears (POG, p = 0.56), and 15 of 75 (20.0%) and 21 of 91 (23.1%) ears (SLOP Boston, p = 0.63) with protons and photons respectively. Conclusions: While cochlear doses were lower in the proton group, patients treated with either protons or photons had similar Grade 3 and 4 ototoxicity rates. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:128 / 132
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In Silico Dosimetric Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Proton Radiotherapy (IMPT) vs. Intensity-Modulated Photon Radiotherapy (IMRT) in the Preoperative Treatment of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma
    Gogineni, E.
    Chen, H.
    Narang, A.
    Deville, C., Jr.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2022, 114 (03): : E605 - E606
  • [32] 3D-proton radiotherapy vs. photon radiotherapy in primary prostate cancer:: Comparison of dose distribution in stage-adapted target volume choice
    Moch, U
    Auberger, T
    Georg, D
    Bogner, J
    Wolff, U
    Wambersie, A
    Pötter, R
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 : 57 - 57
  • [33] Assessing DNA Damage of Proton Vs. Photon Beams Using Plasmid DNA
    Behnke, B.
    Giebeler, A.
    Mardirossian, G.
    Tambasco, M.
    Tambasco, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E457 - E457
  • [34] Second Tumor Risk and Projected Late Effects after Proton vs. Intensity Modulated Photon Radiotherapy for Benign Meningioma: A Dosimetric Comparison
    Shih, H. A.
    Arvold, N. D.
    Niemierko, A.
    Broussard, G. P.
    Fullerton, B.
    Loeffler, J. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 78 (03): : S272 - S272
  • [35] Dosimetric Analysis of Proton Beam Therapy vs. Photon Radiotherapy for Cardiac Tumors with or without Deep Inspiratory Breath Holding: A Case Report
    Chen, D.
    Zhao, M.
    Jiang, W.
    Liang, J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E650 - E651
  • [36] Detection of Early Myocardial Dysfunction by Imaging Biomarkers in Cancer Patients Undergoing Photon Beam vs. Proton Beam Radiotherapy: A Prospective Study
    Abbasi, Muhannad Aboud
    Bruno, Giulia
    Di Stefano, Cristina
    Garcia Bello, Laura
    Laack, Nadia N.
    Corbin, Kimberly S.
    Whitaker, Thomas J.
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    Mutter, Robert W.
    Villarraga, Hector R.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR DEVELOPMENT AND DISEASE, 2023, 10 (10)
  • [37] Treatment plan comparison of proton vs photon radiotherapy for lower-grade gliomas
    Byskov, Camilla S.
    Hansen, Christian R.
    Dahlrot, Rikke H.
    Haldbo-Classen, Lene
    Haslund, Charlotte A.
    Kjaer-Kristoffersen, Flemming
    Kristensen, Thomas O.
    Lassen-Ramshad, Yasmin
    Lukacova, Slavka
    Muhic, Aida
    Nystrom, Petra W.
    Weber, Britta
    Kallehauge, Jesper F.
    PHYSICS & IMAGING IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 20 : 98 - 104
  • [38] Cochlear-optimized plan comparison between protons vs. photon radiosurgery for vestibular schwannoma
    Koetsier, K. S.
    Oud, M.
    de Klerck, E.
    Hensen, E. F.
    van Vulpen, M.
    van Linge, A.
    Slagter, C.
    Habraken, S.
    Hoogeman, M. S.
    Romero, A. Mendez
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1720 - S1721
  • [39] Long-term outcome after definitive photon vs. combined proton/photon irradiation for prostate cancer
    Koerber, S. A.
    Ebel, K.
    Lotsch, R.
    Ristau, J.
    Fink, C. A.
    Schunn, F.
    Schlampp, I.
    Rademacher, J.
    Holland-Letz, T.
    Harrabi, S. B.
    Debus, J.
    Herfarth, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S352 - S352
  • [40] Findings and future steps of proton vs. photon therapy in thoracic cancer: A systematic review
    Liang, Y.
    Hu, X.
    Xu, P.
    Hua, K.
    Verhoeven, K.
    de Ruysscher, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2023, 182 : S1051 - S1052