Consensus building for developing gender-sensitive leading health indicators

被引:6
|
作者
Ben Abdelaziz, Faten [1 ]
机构
[1] WHO, Ctr Hlth Dev, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6510073, Japan
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00038-006-6075-5
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: This article seeks to describe the process of reaching consensus for a gender-sensitive set of leading health indicators between and within multi-level stakeholders from various cultural, social and economic conditions. In 2000 the WHO Centre for Health Development (WKC) embarked on a multilevel participatory process aiming at the formulation of a well-accepted set of gender-sensitive leading health indicators - and considerable interest in their use. Different stakeholders have different needs and demands for information. Failure to reach consensus between the relevant actors led to the development and use of indicators by different groups, creating situation of confusion for end users of data. Methods: The consensus process took almost two years starting from 2003 and WKC played a facilitating role in this process. The consultation process was done through different mechanisms ranging from international meetings, online voting and expert group meeting. Results: The core set of indicators was brought down to 34 leading health indicators and was pilot tested in two sites. Preliminary results of the pilot testing showed that the set was considered as valuable tool for policy and decision-making at various levels. Conclusion: The consensus over the gender-sensitive core set of leading health indicators was a relatively long and extensive process and required some kind of creativity to identify appropriate platforms for consultation. But the key point is that perspectives of multiple stakeholders were included as much as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:S11 / S18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The impact of precarious jobs on mental health: a gender-sensitive literature review
    Erika Valero
    Unai Martin
    Amaia Bacigalupe
    Mireia Utzet
    International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2021, 94 : 577 - 589
  • [42] Gender-sensitive Public Health publications in Germany? Results of a review of literature
    Fuchs, J
    Maschewsky-Schneider, U
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2002, 64 (05) : 284 - 291
  • [43] Gender-sensitive medical approaches in cardiology
    Seeland, Ute
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2023, 148 (09) : 538 - 546
  • [44] Women's reproductive health: A gender-sensitive human rights approach
    Wang, GZ
    Pillai, VK
    ACTA SOCIOLOGICA, 2001, 44 (03) : 231 - 242
  • [45] The impact of precarious jobs on mental health: a gender-sensitive literature review
    Valero, Erika
    Martin, Unai
    Bacigalupe, Amaia
    Utzet, Mireia
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2021, 94 (04) : 577 - 589
  • [46] Gender-sensitive reporting in medical research
    Heidari, Shirin
    Karim, Quarraisha Abdool
    Auerbach, Judith D.
    Buitendijk, Simone E.
    Cahn, Pedro
    Curno, Mirjam J.
    Hankins, Catherine
    Katabira, Elly
    Kippax, Susan
    Marlink, Richard
    Marsh, Joan
    Marusic, Ana
    Nass, Heidi M.
    Montaner, Julio
    Pollitzer, Elizabeth
    Teresa Ruiz-Cantero, Maria
    Sherr, Lorraine
    Sow, Papa Salif
    Squires, Kathleen
    Wainberg, Mark A.
    JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL AIDS SOCIETY, 2012, 15
  • [47] Is COVID-19 Gender-sensitive?
    Mukherjee, Shreya
    Pahan, Kalipada
    JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNE PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01) : 38 - 47
  • [48] Gender-sensitive word embeddings for healthcare
    Agmon, Shunit
    Gillis, Plia
    Horvitz, Eric
    Radinsky, Kira
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 29 (03) : 415 - 423
  • [49] GENDER-SENSITIVE COMMUNICATION SKILLS IN ADOLESCENCE
    Bocharina, N. A.
    PSYCHOLINGUISTICS, 2016, 19 (01): : 24 - 35
  • [50] Is COVID-19 Gender-sensitive?
    Shreya Mukherjee
    Kalipada Pahan
    Journal of Neuroimmune Pharmacology, 2021, 16 : 38 - 47