Consensus building for developing gender-sensitive leading health indicators

被引:0
|
作者
Ben Abdelaziz, Faten [1 ]
机构
[1] WHO, Ctr Hlth Dev, Chuo Ku, Kobe, Hyogo 6510073, Japan
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: This article seeks to describe the process of reaching consensus for a gender-sensitive set of leading health indicators between and within multi-level stakeholders from various cultural, social and economic conditions. In 2000 the WHO Centre for Health Development (WKC) embarked on a multilevel participatory process aiming at the formulation of a well-accepted set of gender-sensitive leading health indicators - and considerable interest in their use. Different stakeholders have different needs and demands for information. Failure to reach consensus between the relevant actors led to the development and use of indicators by different groups, creating situation of confusion for end users of data. Methods: The consensus process took almost two years starting from 2003 and WKC played a facilitating role in this process. The consultation process was done through different mechanisms ranging from international meetings, online voting and expert group meeting. Results: The core set of indicators was brought down to 34 leading health indicators and was pilot tested in two sites. Preliminary results of the pilot testing showed that the set was considered as valuable tool for policy and decision-making at various levels. Conclusion: The consensus over the gender-sensitive core set of leading health indicators was a relatively long and extensive process and required some kind of creativity to identify appropriate platforms for consultation. But the key point is that perspectives of multiple stakeholders were included as much as possible.
引用
收藏
页码:S11 / S18
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A field test of the gender-sensitive core set of leading health indicators in Manitoba, Canada
    Haworth-Brockmann, Margaret J.
    Donner, Lissa
    Isfeld, Harpa
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 52 : S49 - S67
  • [2] Challenges in developing gender-sensitive indicators for Finnish researcher training
    Kurki, H
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2005, 14 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [3] Gender-sensitive indicators: Uses and relevance
    Lin, Vivian
    L'Orange, Helen
    Silburn, Kate
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2007, 52 : S27 - S34
  • [4] UNESCO Gender-Sensitive Indicators for Media
    Ainhoa De Frutos-Garcia, Ruth
    [J]. REVISTA MEDITERRANEA COMUNICACION-JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2013, 4 (01): : 193 - 219
  • [5] Use and relevance of gender-sensitive policy and general health indicators: Comparison of gender-sensitive policies and status of women's health in South Asia
    Gill, Roopan
    Stewart, Donna E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2009, 18 (05) : 750 - 751
  • [6] Monitoring Gender Equity in Health Using Gender-Sensitive Indicators: A Cross-National Study
    Diaz-Granados, Natalia
    Pitzul, Kristen Blythe
    Dorado, Linda M.
    Wang, Feng
    McDermott, Sarah
    Rondon, Marta B.
    Posada-Villa, Jose
    Saavedra, Javier
    Torres, Yolanda
    Des Meules, Marie
    Stewart, Donna E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 20 (01) : 145 - 153
  • [7] Gender-sensitive mental health care
    Judd, Fiona
    Armstrong, Sue
    Kulkarni, Jayashri
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 17 (02) : 105 - 111
  • [8] Perspectives of gender-sensitive health reporting
    Lange, C
    Lampert, T
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2004, 66 (03) : 158 - 163
  • [9] Perspectives on gender-sensitive health reporting
    Lange, C
    Lampert, T
    [J]. GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2003, 65 (8-9) : A8 - A8
  • [10] Developing research approaches to improve gender-sensitive health reporting: concept propsal
    Holmberg, C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 495 - 496