Medicoeconomic evaluation of inguinal hernia repair: Shouldice repair vs laparoscopy.

被引:0
|
作者
Damamme, A [1 ]
Samama, G [1 ]
D'Alche-Gautier, MJ [1 ]
Chanavel, N [1 ]
Brefort, JL [1 ]
Le Roux, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] CHU Cote De Nacre, Serv Chirurg Gen Viscerale & Digest, F-14033 Caen, France
来源
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE | 1998年 / 52卷 / 01期
关键词
inguinal hernia; laparoscopy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Between May 1994 and September 1995, 64 men were included in a randomized prospective study comparing conventional Shouldice repair (S group) and transperitoneal laparoscopic repair with polypropylene mesh (L group). Cost evaluation was divided into distinct parts: drugs, non usable surgical materials, medico-technical procedures food and employees costs. In group S, mean operating time was 56', total cost was 3 922 FF in the case of unilateral hernia and 4 808 FF and respectively 77' in the case of bilateral hernia. In group L, mean operative time was 89', total cost 8 949 FF (disposable trocars) and 7 136 FF (non-disposable trocars) in the case of unilateral hernia and 116', 9 570 FF and 7 763 FF in case of bilateral hernia. Postoperative stay was 4.2 days in group S and 4 days in group L. Return to work was 28.6 days in group L and 35.5 days in group S (ns). In conclusion, laparoscopic hernia repair does not decrease post operative pain, hospital stay and return to work, but is twice as expensive.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 16
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条