Human-In-The-Loop: Role in Cyber Physical Agricultural Systems

被引:10
|
作者
Sreeram, M. [1 ]
Nof, S. Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Sch Ind Engn, 315 N Grant St, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Agricultural Robotics; Collaborative Intelligence; Human-in-the-Loop; Multi-Agent Simulation; COLLABORATION; MANAGEMENT; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.15837/ijccc.2021.2.4166
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
With increasing automation, the 'human' element in industrial systems is gradually being reduced, often for the sake of standardization. Complete automation, however, might not be optimal in complex, uncertain environments due to the dynamic and unstructured nature of interactions. Leveraging human perception and cognition can prove fruitful in making automated systems robust and sustainable. "Human-in-the-loop" (HITL) systems are systems which incorporate meaningful human interactions into the workflow. Agricultural Robotic Systems (ARS), developed for the timely detection and prevention of diseases in agricultural crops, are an example of cyber-physical systems where HITL augmentation can provide improved detection capabilities and system performance. Humans can apply their domain knowledge and diagnostic skills to fill in the knowledge gaps present in agricultural robotics and make them more resilient to variability. Owing to the multi-agent nature of ARS, HUB-CI, a collaborative platform for the optimization of interactions between agents is emulated to direct workflow logic. The challenge remains in designing and integrating human roles and tasks in the automated loop. This article explains the development of a HITL simulation for ARS, by first realistically modeling human agents, and exploring two different modes by which they can be integrated into the loop: Sequential, and Shared Integration. System performance metrics such as costs, number of tasks, and classification accuracy are measured and compared for different collaboration protocols. The results show the statistically significant advantages of HUB-CI protocols over the traditional protocols for each integration, while also discussing the competitive factors of both integration modes. Strengthening human modeling and expanding the range of human activities within the loop can help improve the practicality and accuracy of the simulation in replicating a HITL-ARS.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 19
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Why consider the human-in-the-loop in automated cyber-physical production systems? Two cases from cross-company cooperation
    Brauner, Philipp
    Ziefle, Martina
    2019 IEEE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS (INDIN), 2019, : 861 - 866
  • [32] Feedforward control for human-in-the-loop camera systems
    Stanciu, R
    Oh, PY
    2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1- 5, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 1 - 6
  • [33] HackIT: A Human-in-the-Loop Simulation Tool for Realistic Cyber Deception Experiments
    Aggarwal, Palvi
    Gautam, Aksh
    Agarwal, Vaibhav
    Gonzalez, Cleotilde
    Dutt, Varun
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS IN CYBERSECURITY, 2020, 960 : 109 - 121
  • [34] Human-in-the-loop control of guided airdrop systems
    Cacan, Martin R.
    Costello, Mark
    Ward, Michael
    Scheuermann, Edward
    Shurtliff, Michael
    AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 84 : 1141 - 1149
  • [35] Human-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical Production Systems Control (HiLCP2sC): A Multi-objective Interactive Framework Proposal
    Gaham, Mehdi
    Bouzouia, Brahim
    Achour, Noura
    SERVICE ORIENTATION IN HOLONIC AND MULTI-AGENT MANUFACTURING, 2015, 594 : 315 - 325
  • [36] On the design of a Human-in-the-Loop Cyber-Physical System for online monitoring and active mitigation of indoor Radon gas concentration
    Lopes, Sergio, I
    Cruz, Antonio M.
    Moreira, Pedro M.
    Abreu, Carlos
    Silva, Joaquim P.
    Lopes, Nuno
    Vieira, Jose M. N.
    Curado, Antonio
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SMART CITIES CONFERENCE (ISC2), 2018,
  • [37] Modeling of Operator Performance for Human-in-the-loop Power Systems
    Hu, Wan-Lin
    Rivetta, Claudio
    MacDonald, Erin
    Chassin, David P.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS, EPCE 2019, 2019, 11571 : 39 - 54
  • [38] Computational human performance modelling for human-in-the-Loop machine systems
    Kolivand, Hoshang
    Balas, Valentina E.
    Paul, Anand
    Ramachandran, Varatharajan
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (04) : 5350 - 5358
  • [39] Modeling Human-in-the-Loop Behavior and Interactions with HVAC Systems
    Kane, Michael B.
    2018 ANNUAL AMERICAN CONTROL CONFERENCE (ACC), 2018, : 4628 - 4633
  • [40] Synthesis of Human-in-the-Loop Control Protocols for Autonomous Systems
    Feng, Lu
    Wiltsche, Clemens
    Humphrey, Laura
    Topcu, Ufuk
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 13 (02) : 450 - 462