Convergence Assessment of the MCNP5 Model for NUR Research Reactor

被引:1
|
作者
Mokhtari, O. [1 ,2 ]
Mazrou, H. [3 ]
机构
[1] CRND, Div Surete Nucl & Radioprotect, Route Sebala,BP 43, Draria 16050, Alger, Algeria
[2] Univ MHamed Bougara, UR MPE, Fac Sci, Ave Independance, Boumerdes 35000, Algeria
[3] CRNA, Div Environm Surete & Dechets Radioactifts, 02 Blvd Frantz Fanon,BP 399, Algiers 16000, RP, Algeria
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.5048158
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
In recent years, the Monte Carlo (MC) methods have become an extensive and reference tool for criticality calculations. Despite the high precision that could be reached in MC modeling, the criticality calculations are still faced with the problem of fission source convergence leading, thereby, in some cases to false convergences and, in particular, to an erroneous effective multiplication factor. This is a challenging issue from a criticality safety point of view. Thus, to prevent from these specific issues and to obtain correct results, a convergence assessment has been carried out, for the first time, in this work, to the MC model of the NUR research reactor initial core. To this end, both effective multiplication factor (k(eff)) and Shannon entropy of the fission source (H-src) were evaluated for various M, the number of neutrons per cycle, and for different locations of the initial fission source in the reactor core. From the obtained results, it reveals that: a number of 10000 neutrons/cycles (or more) are needed to reduce bias on k(eff) and at least 30 inactive cycles arc required to allow k(eff) convergence. Whereas, the choice of a point source in each fuel element or in each fuel plate are the most preferred assumptions. As for the number of active cycles, it can be fixed according to the reasonable uncertainty that a user may accept for the effective multiplication factor, k(eff).
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A detailed procedure to simulate an HPGe detector with MCNP5
    Conti, C. C.
    Salinas, I. C. P.
    Zylberberg, H.
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2013, 66 : 35 - 40
  • [22] Uncertainty analysis in MCNP5 calculations for brachytherapy treatment
    Gerardy, I.
    Rodenas, J.
    Gallardo, S.
    APPLIED RADIATION AND ISOTOPES, 2011, 69 (08) : 1108 - 1111
  • [23] MTR benchmark static calculations with MCNP5 code
    Bousbia-Salah, Anis
    Benkharfia, Hocine
    Kriangehaiporn, Nateekoool
    Petruzzi, Alessandro
    D'Auria, Francesco
    Ghazi, Nidal
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2008, 35 (05) : 845 - 855
  • [24] DOSE ASSESSMENT WITH MCNP5/X CODE FOR BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY OF PANCREAS CANCER
    Krsti, Dragana Z.
    Nikezi, Dragoslav R.
    Zivkovi, Milena P.
    Jeremi, Marija Z.
    NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY & RADIATION PROTECTION, 2021, 36 (03): : 294 - 298
  • [25] TRIPOLI-4®-MCNP5 ITER A-lite neutronic model benchmarking
    Jaboulay, J. -C.
    Cayla, P. -Y.
    Fausser, C.
    Lee, Y. -K.
    Trama, J. -C.
    Li-Puma, A.
    SNA + MC 2013 - JOINT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUPERCOMPUTING IN NUCLEAR APPLICATIONS + MONTE CARLO, 2014,
  • [26] Stochastic geometry capability in MCNP5 for the analysis of particle fuel
    Brown, FB
    Martin, WR
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2004, 31 (17) : 2039 - 2047
  • [27] Technical Note: Improved implementation of doppler broadening in MCNP5
    Bartol, Laura J.
    DeWerd, Larry A.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (09) : 5635 - 5638
  • [28] Advantages of mesh tallying in MCNP5 for soil analysis calculations
    Doron, O.
    Wielopolski, L.
    Biegalski, S.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY, 2008, 276 (01) : 183 - 186
  • [29] Comparison of KENO-VI and MCNP5 criticality analyses for a Lunar Regolith Clustered-Reactor System
    Bess, John Darrell
    SPACE TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL FORUM STAIF 2008, 2008, 969 : 285 - 292
  • [30] 基于MCNP5软件的中子屏蔽模拟
    彭凤梅
    魏强林
    刘义保
    电脑与电信, 2012, (Z1) : 68 - 70