Evaluating Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled on Basal Insulin: UK ATTAIN Real-World Study

被引:4
|
作者
Jude, Edward B. [1 ,2 ]
Nixon, Mark [3 ]
O'Leary, Caroline [3 ]
Myland, Melissa [3 ]
Gooch, Nick [4 ]
Shaunik, Alka [5 ]
Lew, Elisheva [6 ]
机构
[1] Tameside Gen Hosp, Ctr Diabet, Ashton Under Lyne, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Manchester, Lancs, England
[3] IQVIA, London, England
[4] Sanofi, Guildford, Surrey, England
[5] Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ USA
[6] Sanofi, Chilly Mazarin, France
关键词
Basal insulin; Glycemic control; Therapy intensification; Type; 2; diabetes; MEDICATION ADHERENCE; CLINICAL INERTIA; THERAPY; COMPLICATIONS; PERSISTENCE; MELLITUS; PEOPLE; ASSOCIATION; OUTCOMES; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s13300-019-0667-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction This retrospective, observational cohort study evaluated the effect of therapy intensification on change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 6 and 12 months post intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled on basal insulin (BI) (i.e., HbA1c >= 7.5% [>= 58 mmol/mol]). Methods Patients with T2D with suboptimal glycemic control using BI were identified from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. Patients who underwent therapy intensification (intensifiers) within 12 months of index 1 (the date of the first incidence of suboptimally controlled HbA1c) were matched (1:1) to patients who did not intensify therapy (non-intensifiers). Index 2 was the date of therapy intensification for intensifiers, or a pseudo date for non-intensifiers that resulted in the same duration from index 1 to index 2 as their matched intensifier patient. Primary outcomes were HbA1c change and proportion of patients achieving the HbA1c target at 6 and 12 months post index 2. Results A total of 1342 patients (n = 646 intensifiers; n = 696 non-intensifiers) were included in the analysis. At post index 2, mean HbA1c change was substantially greater at 6 months for intensifiers than for non-intensifiers (- 0.81% vs. - 0.35%), with no additional benefit at 12 months (- 0.81% vs. - 0.49%, respectively). Compared with non-intensifiers, a greater proportion of intensifiers achieved target HbA1c at 6 months (25.1% vs. 18.8%) and at 12 months (33.4% vs. 28.2%). Conclusions Many real-world patients with T2D suboptimally controlled with BI do not have their therapy intensified. The results of this study suggest that in this patient population, therapy intensification achieves significant reductions in HbA1c at 6 months post intensification, with little additional clinical benefit at 12 months. This suggests that, for patients who fail to achieve their glycemic targets at 6 months, since no meaningful additional clinical benefit is observed at 12 months when continuing the same therapy, further therapy intensification or change should be promptly considered. Funding This study and the Rapid Service Fees were funded by Sanofi.
引用
收藏
页码:1847 / 1858
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cost-Effectiveness of iGlarLixi Versus Premix BIAsp 30 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Suboptimally Controlled by Basal Insulin in the UK
    Rory J. McCrimmon
    Karen Palmer
    Abdul Jabbar Omar Alsaleh
    Elisheva Lew
    Amar Puttanna
    Diabetes Therapy, 2022, 13 : 1203 - 1214
  • [22] Assessment of real-world efficacy and safety of basal insulin plus rapid-acting insulin vs basal insulin treatment among patients with type 2 diabetes in the UK
    Lin, J.
    Jhaveri, M.
    Liao, L.
    Kitio-Dschassi, B.
    Lingohr-Smith, M.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2015, 58 : S76 - S77
  • [23] Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in People With Type 2 Diabetes: Real-World Study
    Maldonado Reyes, Alondra Nicole
    Lugo de la Cruz, Arely Joseline
    Ramirez Frias, Cecilia Nohemi
    Mirafuentes Rios, Martha Evelyn
    Aguilar Barrera, Eliud Salvador
    METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 2022, 128 : S50 - S50
  • [24] Much Ado About Nothing? A Real-World Study of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Switching Basal Insulin Analogs
    Wenhui Wei
    Steve Zhou
    Raymond Miao
    Chunshen Pan
    Lin Xie
    Onur Baser
    Jasvinder Gill
    Advances in Therapy, 2014, 31 : 539 - 560
  • [25] Much Ado About Nothing? A Real-World Study of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Switching Basal Insulin Analogs
    Wei, Wenhui
    Zhou, Steve
    Miao, Raymond
    Pan, Chunshen
    Xie, Lin
    Baser, Onur
    Gill, Jasvinder
    ADVANCES IN THERAPY, 2014, 31 (05) : 539 - 560
  • [26] EFFECT OF DAILY OR WEEKLY GLP-1 RECEPTOR AGONISTS ON GLYCEMIC CONTROL IN INSULIN-NAIVE PATIENTS WITH POORLY CONTROLLED TYPE 2 DIABETES: A REAL-WORLD STUDY
    Singhal, M.
    Nguyen, H.
    Schauerhamer, M.
    Unni, S.
    Cobden, D.
    McAdam-Marx, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A54 - A54
  • [27] Analysis of Glycemic Control and Weight Changes in Patients Treated with Analog Basal Insulin in a Real-World Setting
    Brixner, Diana I.
    Mcadam-Marx, Carrie
    Nelson, Richard
    Aagren, Mark
    Bouchard, Jon
    DIABETES, 2009, 58 : A514 - A514
  • [28] Impact of treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled on basal insulin in The Health Improvement Network UK primary care database
    Lew, E.
    Myland, M.
    Nixon, M.
    Gooch, N.
    O'Leary, C.
    Shaunik, A.
    Jude, E. B.
    DIABETOLOGIA, 2018, 61 : S176 - S176
  • [29] Real-World Medication Utilization and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Longitudinal Database Analysis
    Chandran, Arthi
    Parisi, Monika
    Saltiel-Berzin, Rita
    Saliu, Drilon
    Bonafede, Machaon
    DIABETES, 2015, 64 : A343 - A343
  • [30] Evaluating glycaemic control in patients poorly controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs in real-world setting: Results from assessing the Appropriate Timing of Type 2 diAbetes INtensification (ATTAIN)
    Jude, Edward B.
    O'Leary, Caroline
    Myland, Melissa
    Nixon, Mark
    Gooch, Nick
    Shaunik, Alka
    Lew, Elisheva
    ENDOCRINOLOGY DIABETES & METABOLISM, 2020, 3 (01)