Periprosthetic Bone Mineral Density Around Uncemented Titanium Stems in the Second and Third Decade After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A DXA Study After 12, 17 and 21 Years

被引:24
|
作者
Peitgen, David S. [1 ]
Innmann, Moritz M. [1 ]
Merle, Christian [1 ]
Gotterbarm, Tobias [1 ]
Moradi, Babak [1 ]
Streit, Marcus R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Heidelberg Univ, Ctr Orthopaed Trauma Surg & Spinal Cord Injury, Clin Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Schlierbacher Landstr 200a, D-69118 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
DXA; Cementless total hip replacement; Long-term follow-up; BMD; Periprosthetic fracture; Bone remodelling; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; FOLLOW-UP; PROXIMAL FEMUR; BMD; IMPLANTATION; FRACTURE; 10-YEAR; DESIGN; DEXA;
D O I
10.1007/s00223-018-0438-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Implant failure and periprosthetic fractures because of periprosthetic bone loss are a major concern in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Hardly any clinical data exist on the long-term evolution of bone mineral density (BMD) around uncemented femoral implants. The question to address is whether relevant bone loss continues into third decade around well-fixed uncemented femoral implants. BMD around stable uncemented straight titanium femoral implants was assessed in a longitudinal cohort study. We included 142 hips of 128 patients and measured the development of the periprosthetic BMD using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The baseline measurement was 12years (t(1)) after the implantation of an uncemented femoral stem. Follow-up-measurements were performed at 17 (t(2)) and at 21years (t(3)) after primary THA. The regions of interest (ROI) were selected conforming to Gruen et al. We acquired complete data including three consecutive measurements (t(1), t(2), t(3)) for 42 patients (49 hips). Performing radiographic evaluation at t(1), t(2) and t(3), we found a regular bone-implant interface present in all cases. Significant decrease in BMD could be shown in ROI 1 (p=0.0001; -7.8%), 4 (p=0.024; -2.4%), 6 (p=0.001; -5.5%) and 7 (p<0.0001; -11.7%) between t(1) and t(3) and in ROI 1 (p=0.002; -3.7%), 2 (p=0.046; -3.6%), 4 (p=0.002; -2.7%) and 7 (p<0.0001; -8.0%) between t(2) and t(3). There were significant differences in overall bone density (netavg) between t(1) and t(3) (p=0.001; -3.6%) and between t(2) and t(3) (p=0.020; -2.1%). The data indicate clinically relevant changes of BMD especially in the proximal Gruen zones in the long-term after uncemented THA. Loss of periprosthetic BMD might be a risk factor for periprosthetic fractures.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 379
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Short-Term Analysis of the Changes in the Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur After Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Prospective Study of 110 Patients
    Mohanty, Shubhranshu S.
    Vasavda, Akash N.
    Rai, Abhishek K.
    Rathod, Tushar N.
    Kamble, Prashant
    Keny, Swapnil
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (03)
  • [43] Comparison of periprosthetic bone mineral density between two types of short-stems in total hip arthroplasty with a mean follow-up of 4 years
    Djebara, Az-Eddine
    El Yagoubi, Abdelkader
    Mertl, Patrice
    El Fatayri, Bachar
    Dehl, Massinissa
    Gabrion, Antoine
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2022, 108 (01)
  • [44] Influence of preoperative mechanical bone quality and bone mineral density on aseptic loosening of total hip arthroplasty after seven years
    Krischak, GD
    Wachter, NJ
    Zabel, T
    Suger, G
    Beck, A
    Kinzl, L
    Claes, LE
    Augat, P
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 18 (10) : 916 - 923
  • [45] Changes in bone mineral density in the proximal femur after hip resurfacing and uncemented total hip replacement A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMISED CONTROLLED STUDY
    Smolders, J. M. H.
    Hol, A.
    Rijnders, T.
    van Susante, J. L. C.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2010, 92B (11): : 1509 - 1514
  • [46] Effect of bisphosphonates on periprosthetic bone mineral density after total joint arthroplasty -: A meta-analysis
    Bhandari, M
    Bajammal, S
    Guyatt, GH
    Griffith, L
    Busse, JW
    Schünemann, H
    Einhorn, TA
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (02): : 293 - 301
  • [47] Influence of Different DXA Acquisition Modes on Monitoring the Changes in Bone Mineral Density After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty
    Hakulinen, Mikko A.
    Borg, Hakan
    Hakkinen, Arja
    Parviainen, Tapani
    Kiviranta, Ilkka
    Jurvelin, Jukka S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2012, 15 (01) : 72 - 77
  • [48] Preoperative bone mineral density of the proximal tibia and migration of the tibial component after uncemented total knee arthroplasty
    Petersen, MM
    Nielsen, PT
    Lebech, A
    Toksvig-Larsen, S
    Lund, B
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1999, 14 (01): : 77 - 81
  • [49] Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty
    Wilkinson, JM
    Hamer, AJ
    Stockley, I
    Eastell, R
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2002, 17 (07) : 1337 - 1337
  • [50] Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in aseptic loosening after total hip arthroplasty
    Wilkinson, JM
    Hamer, AJ
    Rogers, A
    Stockley, I
    Eastell, R
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2003, 21 (04) : 691 - 696