Cardiovascular safety of naltrexone and bupropion therapy: Systematic review and meta-analyses

被引:14
|
作者
Sposito, Andrei C. [1 ,2 ]
Bonilha, Isabella [1 ]
Luchiari, Beatriz [1 ]
Benchimol, Alexander [3 ]
Hohl, Alexandre [4 ]
Moura, Fabio [5 ]
Cercato, Cintia [6 ]
Geloneze, Bruno [2 ]
Nadruz, Wilson [1 ]
Aguilar-Salinas, Carlos [7 ]
Carvalho, Luiz Sergio F. [1 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Dept Cardiol, Campinas, Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, Obes & Comorbid Res Ctr, Campinas, Brazil
[3] State Inst Diabet & Endocrinol, Obes & Eating Disorders Grp, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Clin Med, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[5] Univ Pernambuco, Endocrinol & Metab Dept, Recife, PE, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Obes & Metab Syndrome Grp, Sch Med, Div Endocrinol & Metab,Clin Hosp, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[7] Natl Inst Med Sci & Nutr, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[8] Inst Strateg Management Healthcare, Directory Clin Res & Innovat, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
bupropion; cardiovascular risk; meta‐ analysis; naltrexone; SMOKING-CESSATION; OBESE-PATIENTS; RISK-FACTORS; WEIGHT-LOSS; OVERWEIGHT; DISEASE; SMOKERS; EVENTS; TRIAL; SR;
D O I
10.1111/obr.13224
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Despite being approved for clinical use, evidence of cardiovascular safety (CV) is lacking for treatment with bupropion, naltrexone, or their combination (B-N). The purpose of the study is to determine the relationship between these treatments and the risk of major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE). Phase 3 randomized clinical trials (RCT) evaluating bupropion, naltrexone, or B-N versus control with reported incidence of MACE. The meta-analysis included 12 RCTs, 69% for weight loss and 29% for smoking cessation, with 19,176 patients and 7354 patient-years who were randomized to an active treatment (bupropion [n = 2965] or B-N [n = 6980] or naltrexone [n = 249]) versus control (placebo [n = 6968] or nicotine patch [n = 2014]). The mean age was 54 +/- 8 years (55% female), and the baseline BMI was 32 +/- 5 kg/m(2). The additive network meta-analysis model for random effects showed no association between bupropion, B-N, or naltrexone and MACE (odds ratio [OR] = 0.90 [95%CI 0.65-1.25], p = 0.52; OR = 0.97 [95%CI 0.75-1.24], p = 0.79; OR = 1.08 [95%CI 0.71-1.63], p = 0.73, respectively; I-2 = 0%, p = 0.86). Meta-regression analyses showed no significant association between MACE and potential confounders from RCT demographic disparities (p = 0.58). The statistical power (post hoc two-tailed) for non-inferiority was 91%, giving a strong probability of validity. Naltrexone, bupropion, or B-N is not associated with the incidence of MACE as compared with placebo.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A Systematic Review of Conflicting Meta-Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery
    Vavken, Patrick
    Dorotka, Ronald
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2009, 467 (10) : 2723 - 2735
  • [42] Improved adherence in conducting and reporting of systematic review, meta-analyses and network meta-analyses - need of the hour?
    Bhat, Amit
    Subbaiah, Roopashree
    Mandal, Anwesha
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2022, 38 : 12 - 12
  • [43] A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY OF NETWORK META-ANALYSES
    Chambers, J.
    Naci, H.
    Wouters, O.
    Pyo, J.
    Gunjal, S.
    Kennedy, I
    Hoey, M.
    Winn, A.
    Neumann, P. J.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (03) : A31 - A31
  • [44] Fasting and metabolic syndrome: A systematic review and Meta-analyses
    Li, Xue
    Nian, Binbin
    Li, Ruizhi
    Cao, Xinyu
    Liu, Yanjun
    Liu, Yuanfa
    Xu, Yong-Jiang
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2024, 64 (07) : 1836 - 1844
  • [45] Psychological treatment of depression; a systematic review of meta-analyses
    Cuijpers, P
    Dekker, J
    NEDERLANDS TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR GENEESKUNDE, 2005, 149 (34) : 1892 - +
  • [46] Exploring the fragility of meta-analyses in ophthalmology: a systematic review
    Nanji, Keean
    Xie, Jim
    Hatamnejad, Amin
    Pur, Daiana R.
    Phillips, Mark
    Zeraatkar, Dena
    Wong, Tien Yin
    Guymer, Robyn H.
    Kaiser, Peter K.
    Sivaprasad, Sobha
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Steel, David H.
    Wykoff, Charles C.
    Chaudhary, Varun
    EYE, 2024, : 3153 - 3160
  • [47] The Brain in Oral Clefting: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses
    Sandor-Bajusz, Kinga A.
    Sadi, Asaad
    Varga, Eszter
    Csabi, Gyorgyi
    Antonoglou, Georgios N.
    Lohner, Szimonetta
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROANATOMY, 2022, 16
  • [48] Adjunctive Nutraceuticals for Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses
    Sarris, Jerome
    Murphy, Jenifer
    Mischoulon, David
    Papakostas, George I.
    Fava, Maurizio
    Berk, Michael
    Ng, Chee H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 173 (06): : 575 - 587
  • [49] Challenges in the peer review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Vintzileos, Anthony M.
    Carvajal, Jonathan
    Islam, Shahidul
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2013, 26 (08): : 768 - 771
  • [50] Quality of meta-analyses in freshwater ecology: A systematic review
    Lodi, Sara
    Godoy, Bruno S.
    Ortega, Jean C. G.
    Bini, Luis M.
    FRESHWATER BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (05) : 803 - 814