Covered Stents for Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:21
|
作者
Mallory, Austin [1 ]
Giannopoulos, Stefanos [1 ]
Lee, Paul [1 ]
Kokkinidis, Damianos G. [1 ]
Armstrong, Ehrin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Div Cardiol, Rocky Mt Reg VA Med Ctr, Denver, CO 80202 USA
关键词
AIOD; aortoiliac occlusive disease; covered stent; bare metal stent; endovascular treatment; therapy; SELF-EXPANDING STENTS; BARE-METAL STENT; AORTIC BIFURCATION; KISSING STENTS; SURGICAL RECONSTRUCTION; EXPANDABLE STENTS; EDITORS CHOICE; OUTCOMES; TASC; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1177/15385744211010381
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) has largely shifted to endovascular techniques, with primary stenting constituting the preferred treatment approach. The goal of the current study was to summarize available literature and to determine whether covered stents are superior to bare metal stents for the treatment of AIOD, in terms of both periprocedural and long-term outcomes. Methods: A meta-analysis of 47 studies was conducted with the use of random effects modeling. The incidence of adverse events during follow up among the individual included studies was synthesized. Results: Most of the lesions were located at the common iliac arteries and were chronic total occlusions. The procedure was technically successful in almost all cases in both groups, with a low rate of periprocedural complications observed in both groups. The reported primary patency rates for the non-covered and covered stent group during an average follow up of 24.3 months among the individual studies, were 84% and 92% respectively, while surgical or endovascular re-intervention was required in 10% of non-covered stent cases and in 6% of covered stent cases. Eight studies comparing covered vs non-covered stents in terms of patency demonstrated superiority of covered stents (OR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.01-6.01; p = 0.047 Combining TASC C/D lesions together 12 studies reported 92% (95%CI:89%-95%) primary patency in the covered stent group, while 7 studies reported 75% (95%CI: 60%-88%) primary patency for cases treated with non-covered stents. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that covered stents are safe and effective when utilized for the treatment of AIOD. Covered stents were associated with a statistically significant higher odds of primary patency in both the overall cohort and in more complex TASC C/D lesions. However, additional high-quality comparative analyses between covered vs bare metal stents and between several types of covered stents are needed to determine the most optimal treatment modality for AIOD.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 570
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and Safety of Covered Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hu, Chenming
    Chen, Lang
    Wu, Min
    Ye, Qianling
    Zou, Jun
    Zhao, Bin
    Li, Xiang
    Wu, Huaping
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2024,
  • [2] The use of covered stents in aortoiliac obstructions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bekken, Joost A.
    Jongsma, Hidde
    Fioole, Bram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 59 (01): : 14 - 25
  • [3] Covered vs Uncovered Stents for Aortoiliac and Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Hajibandeh, Shahab
    Hajibandeh, Shahin
    Antoniou, Stavros A.
    Torella, Francesco
    Antoniou, George A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 23 (03) : 442 - 452
  • [4] A systematic review of endovascular treatment of extensive aortoiliac occlusive disease
    Jongkind, Vincent
    Akkersdijk, George J. M.
    Yeung, Kak K.
    Wisselink, Willem
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (05) : 1376 - 1383
  • [5] A systematic review of covered balloon-expandable stents for treating aortoiliac occlusive disease
    Mwipatayi, B. Patrice
    Ouriel, Kenneth
    Anwari, Tahmina
    Wong, Jackie
    Ducasse, Eric
    Panneton, Jean M.
    De Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    Dave, Rajesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 72 (04) : 1473 - +
  • [6] Covered Stents vs Bare Metal Stents for Aortoiliac Arterial Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zeng, Chenlin
    Wu, Zhaoyu
    Lei, Jiahao
    Pu, Hongji
    Qiu, Peng
    Peng, Zhaoxi
    Liu, Yijun
    Ye, Kaichuang
    Lu, Xinwu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2023,
  • [7] Systematic Review of Results of Kissing Stents in the Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease
    Jebbink, Erik Groot
    Holewijn, Suzanne
    Slump, Cornelis H.
    Lardenoije, Jan-Willem
    Reijnen, Michel M. P. J.
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 42 : 328 - 336
  • [8] Open versus Endovascular Surgery in Complex Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies
    Cagney, D.
    Sautha, A.
    Fulton, G.
    Manning, B. J.
    [J]. IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 189 (SUPPL 5) : S119 - S120
  • [9] Clinical Outcomes of 5358 Patients Undergoing Direct Open Bypass or Endovascular Treatment for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Indes, Jeffrey E.
    Pfaff, Miles J.
    Farrokhyar, Forough
    Brown, Hillary
    Hashim, Peter
    Cheung, Kevin
    Sosa, Julie Ann
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2013, 20 (04) : 443 - 455
  • [10] Open Versus Endovascular Repair With Covered Stents for Complex Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease: Cost Analysis Results
    Colacchio, Elda Chiara
    Squizzato, Francesco
    Boemo, Deris Gianni
    Grego, Franco
    Piazza, Michele
    Antonello, Michele
    [J]. ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 97 : 382 - 391