Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Single Doses of Intravenous Paracetamol for Placement of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters in Preterm Infants

被引:13
|
作者
Roofthooft, Daniella W. E. [1 ]
Simons, Sinno H. P. [1 ]
van Lingen, Richard A. [4 ]
Tibboel, Dick [2 ,3 ]
van den Anker, John N. [2 ,3 ,5 ,6 ]
Reiss, Irwin K. H. [1 ]
van Dijk, Monique [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Div Neonatol, Dept Pediat, Wytemaweg 80, NL-3015 CN Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Intens Care, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus MC Sophia Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat Surg, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Isala Clin, Div Neonatol, Princess Amalia Dept Pediat, Zwolle, Netherlands
[5] Childrens Natl Med Ctr, Div Pediat Clin Pharmacol, Washington, DC 20010 USA
[6] Univ Childrens Hosp, Div Pediat Pharmacol & Pharmacometr, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Procedural pain; Analgesia; Paracetamol; Central line; Premature Infant Pain Profile; Preterm infants; PROCEDURAL PAIN; ORAL SUCROSE; REMIFENTANIL; ANALGESIA; PROFILE; VALIDATION; MORPHINE; GLUCOSE; EMLA;
D O I
10.1159/000468975
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: The availability of a safe and effective pharmacological therapy to reduce procedural pain in preterm infants is limited. The effective analgesic single dose of intravenous paracetamol in preterm infants is unknown. Comparative studies on efficacy of different paracetamol doses in preterm infants are lacking. Objectives: To determine the analgesic effects of different single intravenous paracetamol doses on pain from peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement in preterm infants. Methods: In a blinded randomized controlled trial, the analgesic effects of 10-, 15-, and 20-mg/kg single-dose intravenous paracetamol before PICC placement were compared in neonates with a gestational age <32 weeks. Secondly, a separate age-matched nonrandomized control group receiving oral sucrose was included. Pain was assessed with the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) and the COMFORTneo score. Peak plasma concentrations of paracetamol were determined. Results: A total of 60 patients were included in the paracetamol dose groups (median gestational age = 27.8, IQR: 25.7-29.2 weeks). PIPP scores were comparable: median = 8 (IQR: 6-10.5), 7 (IQR: 6-9), and 8 (IQR: 6-10) for the 10-, 15-, and 20-mg/kg paracetamol groups, respectively (p = 0.94). COMFORTneo scores were not statistically different between the different paracetamol dose groups (p = 0.35). All randomized subjects, except for 3 who received 10 mg/kg of paracetamol, had peak paracetamol concentrations >9 mg/L. PIPP (p = 0.78) and COMFORTneo (p = 0.08) scores were also comparable between paracetamol-and sucrosetreated patients. Conclusions: We found no analgesic benefit from intravenous paracetamol studied in different single doses over sucrose for PICC placement in preterm infants. Paracetamol is not a suitable analgesic for this procedure in preterm infants. (C) 2017 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 158
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Ultrasound-guided central line insertion and standard peripherally inserted catheter placement in preterm infants: Comparing results from prospective study in a single-center
    Al Hamod, Dany Antanios
    Zeidan, Smart
    Al Bizri, Ayah
    Baaklini, Georges
    Nassif, Yolla
    NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 8 (05) : 205 - 209
  • [42] EMLA cream for percutaneous venous central line placement in preterm infants: A randomized, controlled trial
    Rubio, DRM
    Soto, AG
    Oliveira, F
    Lopez, F
    Sola, A
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 2000, 47 (04) : 415A - 415A
  • [43] Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Thrombosis-Reverse Tapered versus Nontapered Catheters: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Itkin, Maxim
    Mondshein, Jeffrey I.
    Stavropoulos, S. William
    Shlansky-Goldberg, Richard D.
    Soulen, Michael C.
    Trerotola, Scott O.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 25 (01) : 85 - 91
  • [44] Umbilical Venous Catheter Versus Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Dongara, Ashish R.
    Patel, Dipen V.
    Nimbalkar, Somashekhar M.
    Potana, Nirav
    Nimbalkar, Archana S.
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2017, 63 (05) : 374 - 379
  • [45] A prospective, randomized comparison of three different types of valved and non-valved peripherally inserted central catheters
    Pittiruti, Mauro
    Emoli, Alessandro
    Porta, Patrizia
    Marche, Bruno
    DeAngelis, Rosa
    Scoppettuolo, Giancarlo
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2014, 15 (06): : 519 - 523
  • [46] A randomized, controlled trial evaluating postinsertion neck ultrasound in peripherally inserted central catheter procedures
    Schweickert, William D.
    Herlitz, Jean
    Pohlman, Anne S.
    Gehlbach, Brian K.
    Hall, Jesse B.
    Kress, John P.
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2009, 37 (04) : 1217 - 1221
  • [47] Midline Venous Catheter vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter for Intravenous Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Bentridi, Ahmed
    Giroux, Marie-France
    Soulez, Gilles
    Bouchard, Louis
    Perreault, Pierre
    Chouinard, Audrey
    Dorais, Marc
    Do Amaral, Ricardo
    Bernier, Pascaline
    Therasse, Eric
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2025, 8 (03)
  • [48] A model for a nurse-led programme of bedside placement of peripherally inserted central catheters in neonates and infants with congenital cardiac disease
    King, Deborah S.
    da Cruz, Eduardo
    Kaufman, Jon
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2010, 20 (03) : 302 - 307
  • [49] Early PARacetamol (EPAR) Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Paracetamol to Promote Closure of the Ductus Arteriosus in Preterm Infants
    Schindler, Tim
    Smyth, John
    Bolisetty, Srinivas
    Michalowski, Joanna
    Mallitt, Kylie-Ann
    Singla, Abhijeet
    Lui, Kei
    NEONATOLOGY, 2021, : 274 - 281
  • [50] A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Tunnel Lengths in Adult Patients With Cancer
    Li, Jia
    Hu, Zeyin
    Lin, Xiling
    Huang, Weihua
    Huang, Chunli
    Luo, Jielin
    Li, Lihua
    Zhang, Xinghong
    Qin, Huiying
    CLINICAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2023, 27 (03) : 295 - 304