R2 and idiosyncratic volatility: Which captures the firm-specific return variation?

被引:30
|
作者
Zhang, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiao [1 ]
Shen, Dehua [3 ]
Teglio, Andrea [3 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Comp & Analyt Complex Management Syst, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Jaume 1, Dept Econ, Castellon de La Plana, Spain
关键词
R-2; Idiosyncratic volatility; Short selling; Firm-specific return variation; Information environment; INFORMATION ARRIVAL; COSTLY ARBITRAGE; ANALYST COVERAGE; RISK; SYNCHRONICITY; STOCKS; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.econmod.2016.02.025
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
A growing literature regards R-2 and idiosyncratic volatility as interchangeable proxies for firm-specific return variation and examines its relations to information efficiency. However, the question on choosing the appropriate proxy, i.e., R-2 or idiosyncratic volatility, is less investigated. This paper provides alternative evidences that R-2 and idiosyncratic volatility are not interchangeable with the utilization of a unique short selling mechanism in China. Specifically, we mainly find that 1) R-2 is not a satisfied proxy when the information environment for individual firm is improved, while idiosyncratic volatility is a satisfied proxy under the improved information environment; 2) R-2 and idiosyncratic volatility are satisfied proxies for firm-specific return variation when the information environment for individual firm is deteriorated. These results also complement the existing literature on figuring out the appropriate proxy for firm-specific return variation under different information environment. (c) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 304
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条