Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting

被引:112
|
作者
Jensen, J. Bradford [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Quinn, Dennis P. [1 ,2 ]
Weymouth, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Int Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Peterson Inst Int Econ, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[4] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
CONGRESSIONAL VOTES; GLOBALIZATION; COMPENSATION; ELECTIONS; ATTITUDES; EXPOSURE; POLITICS; JOBS; TIME;
D O I
10.1017/S0020818317000194
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
International trade directly influences US presidential elections. We explore the electoral implications of the increasing tradability of services and the large US surplus in services trade. Our paper builds on prior work showing that job insecurity from import competition in manufacturing diminishes political support for incumbents. We construct novel measures of the tradability of an industry using establishment-level data covering nearly all US economic activity. We find increases in incumbent party vote shares in counties with large numbers of workers in high-skilled tradable services as well as goods, and decreases in counties with high employment in low-skilled manufacturing. Incumbent parties are particularly vulnerable to losing votes in swing states with many low-skilled manufacturing workers. In national-level models, we show for the first time that increasing imports (exports) are associated with decreasing (increasing) presidential incumbent vote shares. The national-level effects are large and politically consequential. We also find an Electoral College incentive to protect the manufacturing sector and to oppose trade agreements.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 457
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Winners and losers in US marine aquaculture under climate change
    Fong, C. R.
    DeCesaro, J.
    Clawson, G.
    Frazier, M.
    Halpern, B. S.
    Froehlich, H. E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 19 (11):
  • [22] Who Are the Winners and the Losers? Transitions in the US Household Income Distribution
    Hisnanick, John J.
    REVIEW OF RADICAL POLITICAL ECONOMICS, 2011, 43 (04) : 467 - 487
  • [23] Winners and losers in US-China scientific research collaborations
    Jenny J. Lee
    John P. Haupt
    Higher Education, 2020, 80 : 57 - 74
  • [24] Winners and losers in US-China scientific research collaborations
    Lee, Jenny J.
    Haupt, John P.
    HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 80 (01) : 57 - 74
  • [25] Winners and losers in global supply chain trade: Embedding GSC in CGE
    Dixon, Peter B.
    Rimmer, Maureen T.
    ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2022, 106
  • [26] Salivary hormones and anxiety in winners and losers of an international judo competition
    Papacosta, Elena
    Nassis, George P.
    Gleeson, Michael
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2016, 34 (13) : 1281 - 1287
  • [27] Winners or losers? Democracies in international crisis, 1918-94
    Gelpi, CF
    Griesdorf, M
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2001, 95 (03) : 633 - 647
  • [28] WINNERS AND LOSERS - FORMULATING CANADA POLICIES ON INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY TRANSFERS
    RIDDELLDIXON, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 1992, 47 (01): : 159 - 183
  • [29] Winners and losers under international emission trading for carbon dioxide
    Quinn, KG
    Kosobud, RF
    (DE)REGULATION OF ENERGY: INTERSECTING BUSINESS, ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 1996, : 41 - 50
  • [30] Winners and Losers of the Ballot: Electronic vs. Traditional Paper Voting Systems in Brazil
    Schneider, Rodrigo
    Senters, Kelly N.
    LATIN AMERICAN POLITICS AND SOCIETY, 2018, 60 (02) : 41 - 60