Winners and Losers in International Trade: The Effects on US Presidential Voting

被引:112
|
作者
Jensen, J. Bradford [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Quinn, Dennis P. [1 ,2 ]
Weymouth, Stephen [2 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Int Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, McDonough Sch Business, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Peterson Inst Int Econ, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[4] Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
CONGRESSIONAL VOTES; GLOBALIZATION; COMPENSATION; ELECTIONS; ATTITUDES; EXPOSURE; POLITICS; JOBS; TIME;
D O I
10.1017/S0020818317000194
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 ;
摘要
International trade directly influences US presidential elections. We explore the electoral implications of the increasing tradability of services and the large US surplus in services trade. Our paper builds on prior work showing that job insecurity from import competition in manufacturing diminishes political support for incumbents. We construct novel measures of the tradability of an industry using establishment-level data covering nearly all US economic activity. We find increases in incumbent party vote shares in counties with large numbers of workers in high-skilled tradable services as well as goods, and decreases in counties with high employment in low-skilled manufacturing. Incumbent parties are particularly vulnerable to losing votes in swing states with many low-skilled manufacturing workers. In national-level models, we show for the first time that increasing imports (exports) are associated with decreasing (increasing) presidential incumbent vote shares. The national-level effects are large and politically consequential. We also find an Electoral College incentive to protect the manufacturing sector and to oppose trade agreements.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 457
页数:35
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Winners and Losers from International Trade
    Pavcnik, Nina
    SURVIVAL, 2019, 61 (02) : 97 - 100
  • [2] The biggest losers (and winners) from US trade liberalization
    Reynolds, Kara M.
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, 2009, 18 (03): : 421 - 442
  • [3] Winners and losers in US budget
    不详
    CHEMISTRY IN BRITAIN, 2001, 37 (06) : 9 - 9
  • [4] Winners and losers: the psychology of foreign trade
    Schulman, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS, 2022, 98 (04) : 1465 - 1466
  • [5] Winners and losers in the global trade in food
    McKee, Martin
    van Schalkwyk, May
    LANCET GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 8 (08): : 985 - 986
  • [6] Winners and Losers: The Psychology of Foreign Trade
    Clifford, Scott
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2022, 86 (02) : 424 - 426
  • [7] TRADE AND TAXES - BIG WINNERS, BIGGER LOSERS
    LYTLE, D
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1986, 20 (07) : 28 - 29
  • [8] Winners and losers of the Sino-US trade war from economic and environmental perspectives
    Du, Mingxi
    Chen, Lulu
    Lin, Jintai
    Liu, Yu
    Feng, Kuishuang
    Liu, Qiuyu
    Liu, Yawen
    Wang, Jingxu
    Ni, Ruijing
    Zhao, Yu
    Si, Wei
    Li, Ying
    Kong, Hao
    Weng, Hongjian
    Liu, Mengyao
    Adeniran, Jamiu Adetayo
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (09)
  • [9] Winners and losers in the Council: Voting power consequences of EU enlargements
    Raunio, T
    Wiberg, M
    JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 1998, 36 (04): : 549 - 562
  • [10] Semantic Networks and Competition: Election Year Winners and Losers in US Televised Presidential Debates, 1960-2004
    Doerfel, Marya L.
    Connaughton, Stacey L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 60 (01): : 201 - 218