Lessons learned from the failure of several recent trials with biologic treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus

被引:13
|
作者
Hruskova, Zdenka [1 ,2 ]
Tesar, Vladimir [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Charles Univ Prague, Fac Med 1, Dept Nephrol, Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Gen Univ Hosp Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
SLE; biologic treatment; clinical trial; monoclonal antibodies; treatment; LOW DISEASE-ACTIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PHASE II/III; EFFICACY; SAFETY; NEPHRITIS; RITUXIMAB; MANAGEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; DEFINITIONS;
D O I
10.1080/14712598.2018.1504918
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Introduction: Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) represents a challenge due to variable disease manifestations, clinical course, and outcome. Long-term outcome in SLE remain unsatisfactory and a search for new therapeutic options is definitely warranted. Despite expectations, most clinical trials performed in SLE and lupus nephritis in the last decade did not reach primary outcome, and the only drug that has been licensed is belimumab. Areas covered: Results of negative trials testing monoclonal antibodies and other biologic agents in SLE are briefly summarized. Reasons for the failure of the trials are listed and discussed. Expert opinion: Future studies should recruit patients with similar organ involvement, better defined disease manifestations, higher activity, and similar severity. In addition to testing higher efficacy if given as add-on treatment to standard-of-care, the trials should be aimed at reducing dosing, or completely eliminating some parts of the current standard treatment, especially corticosteroids. Median follow-up of the patients should be longer. Moreover, specific biomarkers are needed to help to identify eligible patients and to better define response to treatment. An urgent unmet need is testing these new drugs in patients with severe SLE (including those refractory to current treatment).
引用
收藏
页码:989 / 996
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New biologic therapy for systemic lupus erythematosus
    Ding, Hui Jen
    Gordon, Caroline
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 13 (03) : 405 - 412
  • [22] Update on Biologic Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Helena Hiemisch Lobo Borba
    Andreas Funke
    Astrid Wiens
    Shirley Ramos da Rosa Utiyama
    Cássio Marques Perlin
    Roberto Pontarolo
    [J]. Current Rheumatology Reports, 2016, 18
  • [23] Update on Biologic Therapies for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Lobo Borba, Helena Hiemisch
    Funke, Andreas
    Wiens, Astrid
    da Rosa Utiyama, Shirley Ramos
    Perlin, Cassio Marques
    Pontarolo, Roberto
    [J]. CURRENT RHEUMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2016, 18 (07)
  • [24] Emerging biologic therapies for systemic lupus erythematosus
    Kato, Hiroshi
    Kahlenberg, J. Michelle
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 36 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [25] LEARNING FROM CLINICAL TRIALS IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS
    Isenberg, D. A.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2017, 76 : 37 - 37
  • [26] Trials and Tribulations in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
    Wofsy, David
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2010, 68 (03): : 175 - 178
  • [28] Recent lessons learned at environmental trials
    Riebel, P
    [J]. PULP & PAPER-CANADA, 2001, 102 (01) : 57 - 57
  • [29] Systemic lupus erythematosus: from pathophysiology to treatment
    Contin-Bordes, C.
    Lazaro, E.
    Pellegrin, J-L.
    Viallard, J-F.
    Moreau, J-F.
    Blanco, P.
    [J]. REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE, 2009, 30 : 9 - 13
  • [30] Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: recent lessons from animal models
    Ghoreishi, M.
    Dutz, J. P.
    [J]. LUPUS, 2010, 19 (09) : 1029 - 1035