Non-proportional damage identification in steel frames

被引:7
|
作者
Ge, Ma [2 ]
Lui, Eric M. [1 ]
Khanse, Ajit C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Syracuse, NY 13244 USA
[2] Leslie E Robertson Associates, New York, NY 10004 USA
[3] URS Corp, Paramus, NJ 07652 USA
关键词
Damage identification; Steel frames; Cross-section damage; Structural dynamics; Finite element; STRUCTURAL DAMAGE; CRACK DETECTION; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.10.013
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A non-proportional damage detection method capable of identifying the location and determining the severity of cross-section damage in plane steel frames is presented. The proposed method consists of two components: a damage identification component and a damage severity component. Both components make use of the change in dynamic properties of the structure as a result of damage to determine the location and severity of the damage. One significant feature of the damage identification component of the proposed method is its ability to accurately isolate the different damage regions from the structure before the damage severity component of the method is applied. Since these damage regions are usually small in comparison with the overall size of the structure, the amount of computations needed in determining the severity of the damage is drastically reduced. Another feature of the method is its relative insensitivity to noise often present in some of the measured eigenvectors or mode shapes, thus allowing reasonably good results to be obtained even from slightly contaminated data. The proposed approach is applied to several frame examples to show that it can successfully detect and quantify cross-section damage in these structures. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:523 / 533
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A generalized fatigue damage parameter for multiaxial fatigue life prediction under proportional and non-proportional loadings
    Ince, Ayhan
    Glinka, Grzegorz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FATIGUE, 2014, 62 : 34 - 41
  • [32] Damage assessment through changes in mode shapes due to non-proportional damping
    Iezzi, F.
    Spina, D.
    Valente, C.
    11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES (DAMAS 2015), 2015, 628
  • [33] Concept of equivalent overloading for the estimation of damage under multiaxial non-proportional loading
    Taheri, S
    Doquet, V
    LIFETIME MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION OF PLANT, STRUCTURES AND COMPONENTS, 1998, : 59 - 66
  • [34] A damage coupled plastic-stress-state model considering proportional and non-proportional loading conditions
    Weimin Zhuang
    Pengyue Wang
    Yang Liu
    International Journal of Fracture, 2023, 240 : 29 - 50
  • [35] Fatigue strength of SS400 steel under non-proportional loading
    Morishita, T.
    Takaoka, T.
    Itoh, T.
    FRATTURA ED INTEGRITA STRUTTURALE, 2016, (38): : 289 - 295
  • [36] PLASTIC-FLOW OF MILD-STEEL UNDER PROPORTIONAL AND NON-PROPORTIONAL STRAINING AT A CONTROLLED RATE
    MEGUID, SA
    MALVERN, LE
    CAMPBELL, JD
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1979, 101 (03): : 248 - 253
  • [37] Multiaxial fatigue study on steel transversal attachments under constant amplitude proportional and non-proportional loadings
    Garcia, Martin
    Pereira Baptista, Claudio A.
    Nussbaumer, Alain
    12TH INTERNATIONAL FATIGUE CONGRESS (FATIGUE 2018), 2018, 165
  • [38] Pit to crack transition behavior in proportional and non-proportional multiaxial corrosion fatigue of 304 stainless steel
    Huang, Yuhui
    Tu, Shan-Tung
    Xuan, Fu-Zhen
    ENGINEERING FRACTURE MECHANICS, 2017, 184 : 259 - 272
  • [39] Corrosion fatigue behaviour of 304 stainless steel under proportional and non-proportional multiaxial loading condition
    Huang, Y-H.
    Tu, S-T.
    Xuan, F-Z.
    Itoh, T.
    FATIGUE & FRACTURE OF ENGINEERING MATERIALS & STRUCTURES, 2014, 37 (04) : 436 - 445
  • [40] Non-optimality of a linear combination of proportional and non-proportional reinsurance
    Hürlimann, W
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 1999, 24 (03): : 219 - 227