Comparison of acustimulation and ondansetron for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting

被引:58
|
作者
Coloma, M
White, PF
Ogunnaike, BO
Markowitz, SD
Brown, PM
Lee, AQ
Berrisford, SB
Wakefield, CA
Issioui, T
Jones, SB
Jones, DB
机构
[1] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Management, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas, SW Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000542-200212000-00009
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. This study was designed to evaluate transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (acustimulation) using the ReliefBand(R) compared with ondansetron for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after outpatient laparoscopic surgery. Methods: After the authors obtained institutional review board approval and written informed consent, 268 outpatients were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind, placebo- and sham-controlled study. All patients received antiemetic prophylaxis with metoclopramide, 10 mg intravenously, or droperidol, 0.625 mg intravenously, after induction of anesthesia. A total of 90 patients developed PONY in the recovery units and were randomized to one of three treatment groups: (1) the ondansetron group received 4 mg intravenous ondansetron and a sham ReliefBand(R); (2) the acustimulation group received 2 ml intravenous saline and a ReliefBand(R); and (3) the combination group received 4 mg intravenous ondansetron and a ReliefBand(R). A rescue antiemetic (10 mg intravenous metoclopramide) was administered only if the PONY symptoms persisted for 15 min or longer after initiating the treatment. A blinded observer recorded the recovery times, emetic symptoms, rescue antiemetics, maximum nausea scores, complete response to study treatment, and time to achieve discharge criteria. Postdischarge side effects, as well as patient satisfaction and quality of recovery scores, were assessed at 24 and 72 h after surgery. Results: The combination group had a significantly higher complete response rate than the acustimulation group (73% vs. 40%, P < 0.01). In addition, fewer patients (8 vs. 18) in the combination (vs. acustimulation) group experienced subsequent emetic events (P < 0.03). However, there were no significant differences between the three groups with respect to patient satisfaction and quality of recovery scores. Conclusions: Acustimulation with the ReliefBand(R) can be used as an alternative to ondansetron for the treatment of established PONY. However, the use of ondansetron (4 mg intravenously) in combination with the ReliefBand(R) device improved the complete response rate to the acustimulation therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1387 / 1392
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of ramosetron and ondansetron for the treatment of established postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded multicenter trial
    Choi, Yong Seon
    Sohn, Hye-Min
    Do, Sang-Hwan
    Min, Kyeong Tae
    Woo, Jae Hee
    Baik, Hee Jung
    [J]. THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2018, 14 : 601 - 606
  • [32] Comparison of Dexamethasone–Dimenhydrinate and Dexamethasone–Ondansetron in Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Postoperative Patients
    Burak Karabulut
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2018, 42 : 333 - 333
  • [33] A Randomized Comparison of Droperidol, Metoclopramide, Tropisetron, and Ondansetron for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
    Ekinci, Osman
    Malat, Ibrahim
    Isitmangil, Gulbu
    Aydin, Nese
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 2011, 71 (01) : 59 - 65
  • [34] Comparison of Dexamethasone–Dimenhydrinate and Dexamethasone–Ondansetron in Prevention of Nausea and Vomiting in Postoperative Patients
    Nurcan Kizilcik
    Sevgi Bilgen
    Ferdi Menda
    Hatice Türe
    Bilgehan Aydın
    Elif Cigdem Kaspar
    Ozge Koner
    [J]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 2017, 41 : 204 - 210
  • [35] Placebo controlled trials of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Palmer, JBD
    Haigh, CG
    Gibbs, TG
    Taylor, CM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 312 (7024): : 183 - 183
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness of ondansetron for postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Tramèr, MR
    Phillips, C
    Reynolds, DJM
    McQuay, HJ
    Moore, RA
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 54 (03) : 226 - 234
  • [37] Midazolam vs ondansetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Timms, G.
    [J]. ANAESTHESIA, 2007, 62 (06) : 636 - 637
  • [38] Timing of ondansetron administration to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Cruz, Norma I.
    Portilla, Peter
    Vela, Rosendo E.
    [J]. PUERTO RICO HEALTH SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2008, 27 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [39] Combination of ondansetron and droperidol in the prophylaxis of postoperative nausea and vomiting
    Pueyo, FJ
    Carrascosa, F
    Lopez, L
    Iribarren, MJ
    GarciaPedrajas, F
    Saez, A
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (01): : 117 - 122
  • [40] CLINICAL-PHARMACOLOGY OF ONDANSETRON IN POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING
    BABER, N
    PALMER, JL
    FRAZER, NM
    PRITCHARD, JF
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, : 11 - 18