Fuel performance analysis for PWR cores

被引:8
|
作者
Romano, Antonino [1 ]
Shuffler, Carter A. [2 ]
Garkisch, Hans D. [3 ]
Olander, Donald R. [4 ]
Todreas, Neil E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Paul Scherrer Inst, Lab Reactor Phys & Syst Behav, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[2] MIT, Dept Nucl Sci & Engn, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[3] Westinghouse Elect Co LLC, Pittsburgh, PA 15236 USA
[4] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Nucl Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
ANALYSIS CODE; HYDRIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2008.11.022
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Attainable discharge burnups for oxide and hydride fuels in PWR cores were investigated using the TRANSURANUS fuel performance code. Allowable average linear heat rates and coolant mass fluxes for a set of fuel designs with different fuel rod diameters and pitch-to-diameter ratios were obtained by VIPRE and adopted in the fuel code as boundary conditions. TRANSURANUS yielded the maximum rod discharge burnups of the several design combinations, under the condition that specific thermal-mechanical fuel rod constraints were not violated. The study shows that independent of the fuel form (oxide or hydride) rods with (a) small diameters and moderate P/Ds or (b) large diameters and small P/Ds give the highest permissible burnups limited by the rod thermal-mechanical constraints. TRANSURANUS predicts that burnups of similar to 74 MWd/kg U and similar to 163 MWd/kg U (or similar to 65.2 MWd/kg U oxide-equivalent) could be achieved for UO2 and UZrHx fuels, respectively. Furthermore, for each fuel type, changing the enrichment has only a negligible effect on the permissible burnup. The oxide rod performance is limited by internal pressure due to fission gas release, while the hydride fuel can be limited by excessive clad deformation in tension due to fuel swelling, unless the fuel rods will be designed to have a wider liquid metal filled gap. The analysis also indicates that designs featuring a relatively large number of fuel rods of relatively small diameters can achieve maximum burnup and provide maximum core power density because they allow the fuel rods to operate at moderate to low linear heat rates. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1481 / 1488
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF FUEL PERFORMANCE IN REACTOR (PWR) .8. BEHAVIOR OF PLUTONIUM FUEL
    AOKI, T
    JOURNAL OF THE ATOMIC ENERGY SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1984, 26 (09): : 768 - 773
  • [22] EVALUATION OF FUEL PERFORMANCE IN REACTOR (PWR), (VIII) BEHAVIOR OF PLUTONIUM FUEL.
    Aoki, Toshio
    Nippon Genshiryoku Gakkaishi/Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 1984, 26 (09): : 768 - 773
  • [23] Graphite-filled mixed-oxide fuel design for fully loaded PWR cores
    Jo, CK
    Cho, NZ
    Kim, YH
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2000, 27 (09) : 819 - 829
  • [24] A new reduced order model to represent the creep induced fuel assembly bow in PWR cores
    Leturcq, Bertrand
    Le Tallec, Patrick
    Pascal, Serge
    Fandeur, Olivier
    Lamorte, Nicolas
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2022, 394
  • [25] Graphite-filled mixed-oxide fuel design for fully loaded PWR cores
    Jo, Chang Keun
    Cho, Nam Zin
    Kim, Yong Hee
    2000, Elsevier Science Ltd (27)
  • [26] TOWARDS OPTIMAL IN-CORE FUEL MANAGEMENT OF THORIUM-PLUTONIUM-FUELLED PWR CORES
    Zainuddin, Nurjuanis Z.
    Lindley, Benjamin A.
    Parks, Geoffrey T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING - 2013, VOL 6, 2014,
  • [27] Fuel cycle cost analysis of PWR with MOX fuel and dry storage
    China Nuclear Power Technology Research Institute, Shenzhen
    518026, China
    Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu, (430-433):
  • [28] Thermal-hydraulic analysis for wire-wrapped PWR cores
    Diller, P.
    Todreas, N.
    Hejzlar, P.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2009, 239 (08) : 1461 - 1470
  • [29] TREQ - Fuel Rod Performance Code for Demanding PWR Plants
    Pastor, I.
    Doncel, N.
    ICONE17, VOL 5, 2009, : 183 - 191
  • [30] SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF PWR-RCC FUEL ASSEMBLIES
    PREUMONT, A
    THOMSON, P
    PARENT, J
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1982, 71 (01) : 103 - 119