The effects of DAT1 genotype on fMRI activation in an emotional go/no-go task

被引:9
|
作者
Brown, Brenna K. [1 ]
Murrell, Jill [2 ]
Karne, Harish [3 ]
Anand, Amit [3 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Ctr Behav Hlth, 9500 Euclid Ave P57, Cleveland, OH 44122 USA
关键词
Dopamine transporter; Response inhibition; Emotion; DOPAMINE TRANSPORTER GENE; KNOCK-OUT MICE; RESPONSE-INHIBITION; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS; HUMAN BRAIN; ASSOCIATION; BEHAVIOR; RELEASE; VNTR;
D O I
10.1007/s11682-016-9516-7
中图分类号
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100207 ;
摘要
Dopaminergic brain circuits participate in emotional processing and impulsivity. The dopamine transporter (DAT) modulates dopamine reuptake. A variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) in the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1) affects DAT expression. The influence of DAT1 genotype on neural activation during emotional processing and impulse inhibition has not been examined. Forty-two healthy subjects were classified as 9DAT (n = 17) or 10DAT (n = 25) based on DAT1 genotype (9DAT = 9R/9R and 9R/10R; 10DAT = 10R/10R). Subjects underwent fMRI during non-emotional and emotional go/no-go tasks. Subjects were instructed to inhibit responses to letters, happy faces, or sad faces in separate blocks. Accuracy and reaction time did not differ between groups. Within group results showed activation in regions previously implicated in emotional processing and response inhibition. Between groups results showed increased activation in 9DAT individuals during inhibition. During letter inhibition, 9DAT individuals exhibited greater activation in right inferior parietal regions. During sad inhibition, 9DAT Individuals exhibited greater activation in frontal, posterior cingulate, precuneus, right cerebellar, left paracentral, and right occipital brain regions. The interaction between DAT genotype and response type in sad versus letter stimuli showed increased activation in 9DAT individuals during sad no-go responses in the anterior cingulate cortex, extending into frontal-orbital regions. 9DAT individuals have greater activation than 10DAT individuals during neutral and sad inhibition, showing that genotypic variation influencing basal dopamine levels can alter the neural basis of emotional processing and response inhibition. This may indicate that 9R carriers exert more effort to overcome increased basal dopamine activation when inhibiting responses in emotional contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 193
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Event-related potentials in an emotional go/no-go task and remission of geriatric depression
    Alexopoulos, George S.
    Murphy, Christopher F.
    Gunning-Dixon, Faith M.
    Kalayam, Balkrishna
    Katz, Richard
    Kanellopoulos, Dora
    Etwaroo, Glenda R.
    Klimstra, Sibel
    Foxe, John J.
    NEUROREPORT, 2007, 18 (03) : 217 - 221
  • [22] Behavioral effects of sub-anesthetic ketamine in a go/no-go task
    Nilsen, Andred Sevenius
    Juel, Bjorn Erik
    Farnes, Nadine
    Romundstad, Luis
    Storm, Johan Frederik
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES, 2020, 4 (03): : 156 - 162
  • [23] The effects of semantic priming with the yes/no and the go/no-go lexical decision task
    Pérea, M
    Rosa, E
    PSICOTHEMA, 2003, 15 (01) : 114 - 119
  • [24] STIMULUS DEGRADATION EFFECTS ON ERP COMPONENTS IN A VISUAL GO NO-GO TASK
    KOK, A
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 15 (3-4) : 277 - 278
  • [25] Effects of a startle stimulus on response speed and inhibition in a go/no-go task
    Washington, Jessica R.
    Blumenthal, Terry D.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2015, 52 (06) : 745 - 753
  • [26] fMRI predictors of treatment response in major depressive disorder using a parametric Go/No-go Task
    Langenecker, S. A.
    Brinkman, M.
    Young, E. A.
    Akil, H.
    Noll, D. C.
    Zubieta, J.
    CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 21 (03) : 398 - 398
  • [27] Task manipulation effects on the relationship between working memory and go/no-go task performance
    Wiemers, Elizabeth A.
    Redick, Thomas S.
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2019, 71 : 39 - 58
  • [28] Differences in effects of task repetition in three modalities Go/No-go paradigams
    Hirai, Minami
    Ishikura, Keiko
    Sawai, Norie
    Kobayashi, Fumino
    Nakata, Hiroki
    Shibasaki, Manabu
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2020, 34
  • [29] Neural substrates of the interaction of emotional stimulus processing and motor inhibitory control:: An emotional linguistic go/no-go fMRI study
    Goldstein, Martin
    Brendel, Gary
    Tuescher, Oliver
    Pan, Hong
    Epstein, Jane
    Beutel, Manfred
    Yang, Yihong
    Thomas, Katherine
    Levy, Kenneth
    Silverman, Michael
    Clarkin, Jonathon
    Posner, Michael
    Kernberg, Otto
    Stern, Emily
    Silbersweig, David
    NEUROIMAGE, 2007, 36 (03) : 1026 - 1040
  • [30] Psychopathic traits, inhibition, and positive and negative emotion: Results from an emotional Go/No-Go task
    Fournier, Lauren F.
    McDonald, Julia B.
    Clayson, Peter E.
    Verona, Edelyn
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 58 (06)