Bladder continent catheterizable conduit (the Mitrofanoff procedure): Long-term issues that should not be underestimated

被引:24
|
作者
Faure, Alice [1 ]
Cooksey, Rebecca [1 ]
Bouty, Aurore [1 ]
Woodward, Alan [1 ]
Hutson, John [1 ,2 ]
O'Brien, Mike [1 ]
Heloury, Yves [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Urol, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Dept Paediat Urol, FD Stephens Surg Res Grp, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Urology; Mitrofanoff; Continent catheterizable conduit; CHANNELS; CHILDREN; APPENDIX;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.09.054
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Effective bladder emptying by clean intermittent catheterization for children with severe bladder dysfunction is critical for renal preservation and social integration. Use of a continent catheterizable conduit (CCC) as urethral alternative procedure provides effective bladder drainage. However, it brings a substantive maintenance. Methods: Retrospective review of the indications and long-term outcomes of 54 patients with a Mitrofanoff procedure in a single center over a 20-year period (1995-2015). Results: Indications of CCC include 21 neurogenic bladders, 12 patients with epispadias/exstrophy, 13 bladder outlet obstruction, 6 malignancies and 2 cloaca. Median age at surgery was 8.3 years (4 months-20 years). The appendix was used in 76% of cases. Most frequently encountered complication was stomal stenosis (n = 17/34, 50%), occurring at median time of 9 months (2 months-13 years). The other complications were: leakage in 9 (26.5%); conduit stricture in 5 (14.7%), angulation of the conduit in 2 (5.8%) and prolapse in one (3%). Operative revision was encountered by 33 (61%) patients, the majority in the first 2 years. Median follow-up was 4.3 years (3 months-16 years). Conclusions: CCC has a high incidence of complication. It has to be used only when the native urethra is not suitable for catheterization. Carers, patients and families must be prepared to deal with both the complexity of index conditions and the complications of this procedure. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 472
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LONG-TERM ACID SUPPRESSING TREATMENT - FREQUENCY OF LONG-TERM TREATMENT UNDERESTIMATED
    HAMMERTON, W
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6938): : 1238 - 1238
  • [33] Long-term health issues in ultraendurance runners: should we be concerned?
    Scheer, Volker
    Rojas-Valverde, Daniel
    BMJ OPEN SPORT & EXERCISE MEDICINE, 2021, 7 (03):
  • [34] Re: Long-Term Fate of the Bladder after Isolated Bladder Neck Procedure Editorial Comment
    Canning, Douglas A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 194 (03): : 788 - 788
  • [35] LONG-TERM FOLLOW UP OF PATIENTS WITH CEREBRAL PALSY UNDERGOING CATHETERIZABLE CHANNEL CREATION WITHOUT CONCURRENT BLADDER AUGMENTATION
    DeWitt-Foy, Molly
    Gotlieb, Rachael
    Elliott, Sean
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (05): : E429 - E430
  • [36] Long-term effects of ileal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer
    Yang, Won Jae
    Cho, Kang Su
    Rha, Koon Ho
    Lee, Hye Young
    Chung, Byung Ha
    Hong, Sung Joon
    Yang, Seung Choul
    Choi, Young Deuk
    UROLOGY, 2006, 68 (02) : 324 - 327
  • [37] Long-term affects of lleal conduit urinary diversion on upper urinary tract in bladder cancer
    Yang, WJ
    Hong, SJ
    Yang, SC
    Chung, BH
    Rho, KH
    Choi, YD
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (04): : 75 - 76
  • [38] Long-term outcome of ileal conduit diversion
    Madersbacher, S
    Schmidt, J
    Eberle, JM
    Thoeny, HC
    Burkhard, F
    Hochreiter, W
    Studer, UE
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03): : 985 - 990
  • [39] Is urinary diversion using the ileum, transverse colon or sigmoid as a conduit, a safe long-term procedure?
    Stein, R
    Schönherr, C
    Hohenfellner, R
    Thüroff, JW
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04): : 175 - 176
  • [40] Long-Term Complications of Conduit Urinary Diversion
    Shimko, Mark S.
    Tollefson, Matthew K.
    Umbreit, Eric C.
    Farmer, Sara A.
    Blute, Michael L.
    Frank, Igor
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 185 (02): : 562 - 567