Analysis of modulation factor to shorten the delivery time in helical tomotherapy

被引:7
|
作者
Shimizu, Hidetoshi [1 ]
Sasaki, Koji [2 ]
Tachibana, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Tomita, Natsuo [1 ]
Makita, Chiyoko [1 ]
Nakashima, Kuniyasu [1 ]
Yokoi, Kazushi [1 ]
Kubota, Takashi [1 ]
Yoshimoto, Manabu [3 ]
Iwata, Tohru [1 ]
Kodaira, Takeshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Aichi Canc Ctr Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
[2] Gunma Prefectural Coll Hlth Sci, Grad Sch Radiol Technol, Dept Radiat Therapy Educ & Res, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
[3] Aichi Canc Ctr Aichi Hosp, Dept Radiol, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan
来源
关键词
delivery time; head and neck; helical tomotherapy; modulation factor; prostate;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.12075
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
A low modulation factor (MF) maintaining a good dose distribution contributes to the shortening of the delivery time and efficiency of the treatment plan in helical tomotherapy. The purpose of this study was to reduce the delivery time using initial values and the upper limit values of MF. First, patients with head and neck cancer (293 cases) or prostate cancer (181 cases) treated between June 2011 and July 2015 were included in the analysis of MF values. The initial MF value (MFinitial) was defined as the average MFactual value, and the upper limit of the MF value (MFUL) was defined according the following equation: MFUL = 2 x standard deviation of MFactual value + the average MFactual Next, a treatment plan was designed for patients with head and neck cancer (62 cases) and prostate cancer (13 cases) treated between December 2015 and June 2016. The average MFactual value for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases decreased from 2.1 to 1.9 (p = 0.0006), 1.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), 2.0 to 1.7 (p < 0.0001), and 1.8 to 1.6 (p = 0.0004) by adapting the MFinitial and the MFUL values, respectively. The average delivery time for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases also decreased from 19.9 s cm(-1) to 16.7 s cm(-1) (p < 0.0001), 15.0 s cm(-1) to 13.9 s cm(-1) (p = 0.025), 15.1 s cm(-1) to 13.8 s cm(-1) (p = 0.015), and 23.6 s cm(-1) to 16.9 s cm(-1) (p = 0.008) respectively. The delivery time was shortened by the adaptation of MFinitial and MFUL values with a reduction in the average MFactual for head and neck cancer and prostate cancer cases.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 87
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of Modulation Factor to Reduce the Delivery Time of Head and Neck Cases in Helical Tomotherapy
    Shimizu, H.
    Sasaki, K.
    Tachibana, H.
    Tomita, N.
    Makita, C.
    Nakashima, K.
    Yokoi, K.
    Kubota, T.
    Iwata, T.
    Kodaira, T.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3079 - 3079
  • [2] A delivery transfer function (DTF) analysis for helical tomotherapy
    Kissick, Michael W.
    Mackie, Thomas Rockwell
    Jeraj, Robert
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (09): : 2355 - 2365
  • [3] A delivery transfer function (DTF) analysis of helical tomotherapy
    Kissick, M.
    Mackie, T.
    Jeraj, R.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2051 - 2051
  • [4] Delivery verification in sequential and helical tomotherapy
    Kapatoes, JM
    Olivera, GH
    Reckwerdt, PJ
    Fitchard, EE
    Schloesser, EA
    Mackie, TR
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (07): : 1815 - 1841
  • [5] Dynamic Jaw for Helical TomoTherapy Delivery
    Chen, Y.
    Lu, W.
    Chen, Q.
    Reitz, G.
    Ruchala, K.
    Olivera, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (06)
  • [6] Analysis of loose helical delivery using a finite number of beam projections in helical tomotherapy
    Kim, B
    Kron, T
    Van Dyk, J
    Battista, J
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) : 1937 - 1937
  • [7] The influence of field length, pitch, and modulation factor on the quality of helical Tomotherapy plans
    Bhavin, C.
    Langen, K.
    Meeks, S.
    Zeidan, O.
    Jeswani, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (06) : 2142 - 2143
  • [8] Development of Automated Delivery Quality Assurance Analysis Software for Helical Tomotherapy
    Yoon, Y. H.
    Shin, Han-Back
    Han, M. C.
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, D. W.
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Kim, Jihun
    Kim, J. S.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2023, 22
  • [9] Impact of delivery time factor on treatment time and plan quality in tomotherapy
    Yagihashi, Takayuki
    Inoue, Tatsuya
    Shiba, Shintaro
    Yamano, Akihiro
    Minagawa, Yumiko
    Omura, Motoko
    Inoue, Kazumasa
    Nagata, Hironori
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [10] Development of Automated Delivery Quality Assurance Analysis Software for Helical Tomotherapy
    Yoon, Y. H.
    Shin, Han-Back
    Han, M. C.
    Kim, Hojin
    Kim, D. W.
    Hong, Chae-Seon
    Kim, Jihun
    Kim, J. S.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2023, 22