Complex Joint R&D Projects: From Empirical Evidence to Managerial Implications

被引:10
|
作者
Arranz, N. [1 ]
Fdez de Arroyabe, J. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Educ Distancia, Fac Econ & Business Adm, Madrid, Spain
[2] ESIC Business & Mkt Sch, Madrid 28223, Spain
关键词
R&D projects management; complexity; R&D networks; technological; structural and governance subsystem; managerial implications; PERSPECTIVE; CONSORTIA;
D O I
10.1002/cplx.20277
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
At present, the role of joint R&D projects becomes fundamental for understanding the process of innovation. An extensive bibliography exists on the study of the organizations; however, the networks for the development of joint R&D projects themselves as a new form of organization are still a growing field of study. The aim of this article is to provide empirical evidence on joint R&D projects management. To approach this question the starting point will be that joint R&D projects are complex phenomena whose complexity derives from the heterogeneity of agents to take part, the technological process developed and from the organizational form that supports R&D projects. The empirical evidence through European R&D Programs shows the multidimensional character of the joint R&D project concept and allows analyze their different subsystems that is, technological, structural, and governance subsystem. This study not only offers a conceptual framework to help manage these projects, but also discusses practical guidelines that may be useful for its running and management. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Complexity 15: 61-70,2009
引用
下载
收藏
页码:61 / 70
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Behavioural additionality of R&D evaluation: Empirical evidence from Korea public R&D program
    Kim, Eui-Seong
    Song, Yong-Il
    PICMET '07: PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS: MANAGEMENT OF CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2007, : 2247 - 2250
  • [12] R&D cooperation versus R&D subcontracting: empirical evidence from French survey data
    Dhont-Peltrault, Estelle
    Pfister, Etienne
    ECONOMICS OF INNOVATION AND NEW TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 20 (04) : 309 - 341
  • [13] Accounting for R&D: Evidence and Implications
    Canace, Thomas G.
    Jackson, Scott B.
    Ma, Tao
    Zimbelman, Aaron
    CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2022, 39 (03) : 2212 - 2233
  • [14] Distracted institutional shareholders and managerial myopia: Evidence from R&D expenses
    Li Yueting
    Wang Jianling
    Wu Xuan
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 : 30 - 40
  • [15] Valuing R&D projects in a portfolio: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry
    Girotra, Karan
    Terwiesch, Christian
    Ulrich, Karl T.
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (09) : 1452 - 1466
  • [16] COLLUSION THROUGH JOINT R&D: AN EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT
    Duso, Tomaso
    Roeller, Lars-Hendrik
    Seldeslachts, Jo
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2014, 96 (02) : 349 - 370
  • [17] The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and R&D performance: Empirical evidence from Finland and Germany
    Czarnitzki, Dirk
    Ebersberger, Bernd
    Fier, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2007, 22 (07) : 1347 - 1366
  • [18] PUBLIC R&D POLICIES AND PRIVATE R&D INVESTMENT: A SURVEY OF THE EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE
    Becker, Bettina
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC SURVEYS, 2015, 29 (05) : 917 - 942
  • [19] Delivering the D in R&D: Increasing Product Outcomes from R&D Projects
    Lane, Joseph P.
    ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY FROM ADAPTED EQUIPMENT TO INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENTS, 2009, 25 : 736 - 741
  • [20] Assuring R&D quality across organizations in industry - Technology institution joint R&D projects
    Prabhu, GN
    INNOVATION IN TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT - THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP: THE KEY TO GLOBAL LEADERSHIP, 1997, : 559 - 559