Comparison of the dynamic responses of monopiles and gravity base foundations for offshore wind turbines in sand using centrifuge modelling

被引:8
|
作者
Futai, Marcos Massao [1 ]
Haigh, Stuart K. [2 ]
Madabhushi, Gopal S. P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Engn, Dept Struct & Geotech Engn, Av Prof Luciano Gualberto,Travessa 3 382, BR-05508010 Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Engn, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, England
基金
巴西圣保罗研究基金会;
关键词
Centrifuge modelling; Wind turbine foundation; Monopile; Gravity base foundation; Natural frequency; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1016/j.sandf.2020.10.009
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
Monopiles and gravity base foundations (GBF) are two of the most commonly used foundations for offshore wind turbines. As resonance can cause damage and even failure of wind turbines, understanding the difference between the dynamic responses of monopiles and GBFs under free vibration is important. However there is little experimental data regarding their natural frequency, especially from model tests carried out at correct stress levels. This paper presents the results of novel monopile and GBF tests using a centrifuge to directly determine the natural frequency (f(n)) of the foundation-soil system. The natural frequencies of wind turbine monopiles and GBFs in centrifuge models were measured during harmonic loading using a piezo-actuator, with the results confirming that soil-structure interaction must be considered to obtain the system's natural frequency as this frequency reduces substantially from fixed-base values. These results will contribute in preventing resonance induced damage in wind-turbines. (C) 2020 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Japanese Geotechnical Society.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 63
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Foundation modelling to assess dynamic behaviour of offshore wind turbines
    Zaaijer, M. B.
    APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2006, 28 (01) : 45 - 57
  • [32] Computationally efficient modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction of offshore wind turbines on gravity footings
    Damgaard, M.
    Andersen, L. V.
    Ibsen, L. B.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 289 - 303
  • [33] Transient response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles in sand: role of cyclic hydro-mechanical soil behaviour
    Corciulo, Simone
    Zanoli, Omar
    Pisano, Federico
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2017, 83 : 221 - 238
  • [34] Numerical Investigation of the Vertical Response of Bucket Foundations Supporting Offshore Wind Turbines in Sand
    Deb, Tanmoy Kr
    Singh, Baleshwar
    ADVANCES IN COMPUTER METHODS AND GEOMECHANICS, IACMAG 2019, VOL 1, 2020, 55 : 209 - 222
  • [35] Effect of seepage on the penetration resistance of bucket foundations with bulkheads for offshore wind turbines in sand
    Zhang, Puyang
    Wei, Wei
    Jia, Nan
    Ding, Hongyan
    Liu, Run
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 156 : 82 - 92
  • [36] Scour Effect on Dynamic Characteristics and Responses of Offshore Wind Turbines
    Tang, Dongyue
    Zhao, Ming
    CMES-COMPUTER MODELING IN ENGINEERING & SCIENCES, 2020, 124 (02): : 433 - 457
  • [37] Experimental Study on Installation of Composite Bucket Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines in Silty Sand
    Zhang, Puyang
    Zhang, Zhi
    Liu, Yonggang
    Ding, Hongyan
    JOURNAL OF OFFSHORE MECHANICS AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2016, 138 (06):
  • [38] Optimization method for dynamic responses of floating offshore wind turbines
    Ye, Zhou
    Cheng, Xin
    Zhou, Guo-Long
    Li, Chun
    Zhendong yu Chongji/Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2016, 35 (03): : 20 - 26
  • [39] Effects of soil-structure interaction on real time dynamic response of offshore wind turbines on monopiles
    Damgaard, M.
    Zania, V.
    Andersen, L. V.
    Ibsen, L. B.
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2014, 75 : 388 - 401
  • [40] Time Domain Nonlinear Dynamic Response Analysis of Offshore Wind Turbines on Gravity Base Foundation under Wind and Wave Loads
    Tu, Wenbo
    He, Yufan
    Liu, Linya
    Liu, Zonghui
    Zhang, Xiaolei
    Ke, Wenhai
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (11)