Screening for Depression in Adult Patients in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Evidence Review

被引:187
|
作者
O'Connor, Elizabeth A. [1 ]
Whitlock, Evelyn P.
Beil, Tracy L.
Gaynes, Bradley N.
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Ctr Hlth Res, Portland, OR 97227 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
SEROTONIN REUPTAKE INHIBITORS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIALS; NONSTEROIDAL ANTIINFLAMMATORY DRUGS; LATE-LIFE DEPRESSION; DISSEMINATING QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; COMORBIDITY SURVEY REPLICATION; DISEASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS; SERVICES-TASK-FORCE; MAJOR DEPRESSION; ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00007
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: In primary care settings, prevalence estimates of major depressive disorder range from 5% to 13% in all adults, with lower estimates in those older than 55 years (6% to 9%). In 2002, the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended screening adults for depression in clinical practices that have systems to ensure accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and follow-up. Purpose: To conduct a targeted, updated systematic review for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force about the benefits and harms of screening adult patients for depression in a primary care setting, the benefits of depression treatment in older adults, and the harms of depression treatment with antidepressant medications. Data Sources: MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PsycINFO (1998 to 2007), expert suggestions, and bibliographies of recent systematic reviews. Study Selection: Fair-to good-quality randomized clinical trials or controlled clinical trials; systematic reviews; meta-analyses; and large observational studies of serious adverse events and early discontinuation due to adverse effects. All studies were published in English. Data Extraction: Two investigators abstracted, critically appraised, and synthesized 33 articles that met inclusion criteria. Data Synthesis: Nine fair-or good-quality trials indicate that primary care depression screening and care management programs with staff assistance, such as case management or mental health specialist involvement, can increase depression response and remission. Benefit was not evident in screening programs without staff assistance in depression care. Seven regulatory reviews or meta-analyses and 3 large cohort studies indicate no increased risk for completed suicide deaths with antidepressant treatment. Risk for suicidal behaviors was increased in young adults (aged 18 to 29 years) who received antidepressants, particularly those who received paroxetine, but was reduced in older adults. Limitation: Examination of harms was limited to serious adverse events, and existing systematic reviews were primarily used. Additional studies published from 2007 to 2008 extend this review. Conclusion: Depression screening programs without substantial staff-assisted depression care supports are unlikely to improve depression outcomes. Close monitoring of all adult patients who initiate antidepressant treatment, particularly those younger than 30 years, is important both for safety and to ensure optimal treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:793 / W265
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening accuracy for late-life depression in primary care: A systematic review
    Watson, LC
    Pignone, MP
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PRACTICE, 2003, 52 (12): : 956 - 964
  • [22] Depression screening program tailored to the primary health care settings
    Strkic, D.
    Niskanovic, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30
  • [23] Managing patients with multimorbidity: systematic review of interventions in primary care and community settings
    Smith, Susan M.
    Soubhi, Hassan
    Fortin, Martin
    Hudon, Catherine
    O'Dowd, Tom
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [24] Behavioral Treatment of Obesity in Patients Encountered in Primary Care Settings A Systematic Review
    Wadden, Thomas A.
    Butryn, Meghan L.
    Hong, Patricia S.
    Tsai, Adam G.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 312 (17): : 1779 - 1791
  • [25] Behavioral Treatment of Obesity in Patients Encountered in Primary Care Settings: A Systematic Review
    Wadden, Thomas A.
    Butryn, Meghan L.
    Hong, Patricia S.
    Tsai, Adam G.
    OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2015, 70 (03) : 174 - 175
  • [26] Screening Tools for Autism Spectrum Disorder in Primary Care: A Systematic Evidence Review
    Levy, Susan E.
    Wolfe, Audrey
    Coury, Daniel
    Duby, John
    Farmer, Justin
    Schor, Edward
    Van Cleave, Jeanne
    Warren, Zachary
    PEDIATRICS, 2020, 145 : S47 - S59
  • [27] Systematic Review: Classification Accuracy of Behavioral Screening Measures for Use in Integrated Primary Care Settings
    Lavigne, John V.
    Meyers, Kathryn Mendelsohn
    Feldman, Marissa
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 41 (10) : 1091 - 1109
  • [28] A systematic review of the effect of reproductive intention screening in primary care settings on reproductive health outcomes
    Burgess, Carolyne K.
    Henning, Paul A.
    Norman, Wendy V.
    Manze, Meredith G.
    Jones, Heidi E.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 35 (02) : 122 - 131
  • [29] Behavioral Medicine Interventions for Adult Primary Care Settings: A Review
    Funderburk, Jennifer S.
    Shepardson, Robyn L.
    Wray, Jennifer
    Acker, John
    Beehler, Gregory P.
    Possemato, Kyle
    Wray, Laura O.
    Maisto, Stephen A.
    FAMILIES SYSTEMS & HEALTH, 2018, 36 (03) : 368 - 399
  • [30] Enhancing Participation in Depression Care in Outpatient Perinatal Care Settings A Systematic Review
    Byatt, Nancy
    Levin, Leonard L.
    Ziedonis, Douglas
    Simas, Tiffany A. Moore
    Allison, Jeroan
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 126 (05): : 1048 - 1058