Pilot trial to compare tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate to povidone-iodine antisepsis for central venous catheter placement in neonates

被引:47
|
作者
Garland, J. S. [1 ]
Alex, C. P. [1 ]
Uhing, M. R. [2 ]
Peterside, I. E. [3 ]
Rentz, A. [4 ]
Harris, M. C. [5 ]
机构
[1] St Joseph Hosp, Dept Pediat, Wheaton Franciscan Hlth Care, Milwaukee, WI 53210 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Joint Program Neonatol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Sch Med, Div Neonatol & Newborn Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
bloodstream infection; healthcare-related infection; nosocomial infection; contact dermatitis; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; CARE UNIT PATIENTS; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; INTENSIVE-CARE; SEMIQUANTITATIVE CULTURE; TOPICAL IODINE; INFECTION; PREVENTION; HYPOTHYROIDISM; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1038/jp.2009.161
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this pilot trial was to determine whether rates of contact dermatitis following cutaneous antisepsis for central catheter placement were similar among neonates treated with chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone-iodine. Chlorhexidine gluconate absorption was also evaluated. Study Design: Infants weighing >= 1500 g and >= 7 days of age were randomized to a 10% povidone-iodine or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate site scrub before catheter placement. Primary outcomes evaluated included dermatitis, catheter colonization and chlorhexidine gluconate absorption. Result: A total of 48 neonates were enrolled. Colonization rates were similar among treatment groups (P<0.6). Dermatitis did not occur at chlorhexidine gluconate (central catheters, n = 24; peripheral catheters, n = 29) sites. Seven neonates had measurable chlorhexidine gluconate concentrations (range 13 to 100 ng ml(-1)) during catheterization. Conclusion: In this small trial chlorhexidine gluconate antisepsis was tolerated by study neonates. Chlorhexidine gluconate was cutaneously absorbed. Larger trials are needed to determine efficacy and tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate in neonates. Journal of Perinatology (2009) 29, 808-813; doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.161; published online 8 October 2009
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 813
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Preoperative chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine antisepsis for preventing surgical site infection: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Dan
    Wang, Xi-Chen
    Yang, Zeng-Xi
    Gan, Jian-Xin
    Pan, Jie-Bin
    Yin, Lan-Ning
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 44 : 176 - 184
  • [42] Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial
    Ruschulte, Heiner
    Franke, Matthias
    Gastmeier, Petra
    Zenz, Sebastian
    Mahr, Karl H.
    Buchholz, Stefanie
    Hertenstein, Bernd
    Hecker, Hartmut
    Piepenbrock, Siegfried
    ANNALS OF HEMATOLOGY, 2009, 88 (03) : 267 - 272
  • [43] Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial
    Heiner Ruschulte
    Matthias Franke
    Petra Gastmeier
    Sebastian Zenz
    Karl H. Mahr
    Stefanie Buchholz
    Bernd Hertenstein
    Hartmut Hecker
    Siegfried Piepenbrock
    Annals of Hematology, 2009, 88 : 267 - 272
  • [44] Comparison of the Effectiveness of Pre-procedural Rinse and Ultrasonic Coolant using Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Povidone-iodine in Reducing Aerosol Contamination: A Randomised Clinical Trial
    Prathipaty, Rini j
    Kancharla, Anil kumar
    Naidu, N. Sowparnica
    Tasneem, Mohammad Sheema
    Adeni, Tabassum
    Nandigam, Anwesh Reddy
    Gummaluri, Shiva shankar
    Doppalapudi, Hemalatha
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (08) : ZC27 - ZC33
  • [45] Chlorhexidine–alcohol versus povidone–iodine as preoperative skin antisepsis for prevention of surgical site infection in cesarean delivery—a pilot randomized control trial
    Athokpam Lenin Luwang
    Pradip Kumar Saha
    Minakshi Rohilla
    Pooja Sikka
    Lekha Saha
    Vikas Gautam
    Trials, 22
  • [46] Povidone-Iodine versus Chlorhexidine in Skin Antisepsis before Elective Plastic Surgery Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Is Statistical Correctness Always Pursued? Reply
    Veiga, Daniela F.
    Veiga-Filho, Joel
    Veiga Damasceno, Carlos Americo
    Juliano, Yara
    Ferreira, Lydia M.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2009, 124 (01) : 340 - 342
  • [47] Preoperative skin antisepsis using chlorhexidine may reduce surgical wound infections in lower limb trauma surgery when compared to povidone-iodine - a prospective randomized trial
    Ritter, Benedikt
    Herlyn, Philipp Karl Ewald
    Mittlmeier, Thomas
    Herlyn, Anica
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2020, 48 (02) : 167 - 172
  • [48] Comparison of 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate in 70% Alcohol and 10% Povidone-Iodine Used for Port Catheter Dressing Changes in Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Patients: A Prospective Observational Study
    Bakir, Elif
    Sezer, Tufan Asli
    Cavusoglu, Hicran
    Parlakay, Aslinur Ozkaya
    Gursel, Orhan
    TURKISH ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS, 2021, 56 (05): : 451 - 457
  • [49] Is 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol more effective at preventing central venous catheter-related infections than routinely used chlorhexidine gluconate solutions: A pilot multicenter randomized trial (ISRCTN2657745)?
    McCann, Margaret
    Fitzpatrick, Fidelma
    Mellotte, George
    Clarke, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (08) : 948 - 949
  • [50] Safety and efficacy of 2% chlorhexidine gluconate aqueous versus 2% chlorhexidine gluconate in 70% isopropyl alcohol for skin disinfection prior to percutaneous central venous catheter insertion in preterm neonates: the ARCTIC randomised-controlled feasibility trial protocol
    Clarke, Paul
    Craig, Jean V.
    Wain, John
    Tremlett, Catherine
    Linsell, Louise
    Bowler, Ursula
    Juszczak, Ed
    Heath, Paul T.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (02):