Pilot trial to compare tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate to povidone-iodine antisepsis for central venous catheter placement in neonates

被引:47
|
作者
Garland, J. S. [1 ]
Alex, C. P. [1 ]
Uhing, M. R. [2 ]
Peterside, I. E. [3 ]
Rentz, A. [4 ]
Harris, M. C. [5 ]
机构
[1] St Joseph Hosp, Dept Pediat, Wheaton Franciscan Hlth Care, Milwaukee, WI 53210 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Pediat, Div Neonatol, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[3] Hosp Univ Penn, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Joint Program Neonatol, Boston, MA USA
[5] Univ Penn, Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Sch Med, Div Neonatol & Newborn Serv, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
bloodstream infection; healthcare-related infection; nosocomial infection; contact dermatitis; BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS; CARE UNIT PATIENTS; RANDOMIZED TRIAL; INTENSIVE-CARE; SEMIQUANTITATIVE CULTURE; TOPICAL IODINE; INFECTION; PREVENTION; HYPOTHYROIDISM; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1038/jp.2009.161
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this pilot trial was to determine whether rates of contact dermatitis following cutaneous antisepsis for central catheter placement were similar among neonates treated with chlorhexidine gluconate and povidone-iodine. Chlorhexidine gluconate absorption was also evaluated. Study Design: Infants weighing >= 1500 g and >= 7 days of age were randomized to a 10% povidone-iodine or 2% chlorhexidine gluconate site scrub before catheter placement. Primary outcomes evaluated included dermatitis, catheter colonization and chlorhexidine gluconate absorption. Result: A total of 48 neonates were enrolled. Colonization rates were similar among treatment groups (P<0.6). Dermatitis did not occur at chlorhexidine gluconate (central catheters, n = 24; peripheral catheters, n = 29) sites. Seven neonates had measurable chlorhexidine gluconate concentrations (range 13 to 100 ng ml(-1)) during catheterization. Conclusion: In this small trial chlorhexidine gluconate antisepsis was tolerated by study neonates. Chlorhexidine gluconate was cutaneously absorbed. Larger trials are needed to determine efficacy and tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate in neonates. Journal of Perinatology (2009) 29, 808-813; doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.161; published online 8 October 2009
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 813
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pilot trial to compare tolerance of chlorhexidine gluconate to povidone-iodine antisepsis for central venous catheter placement in neonates
    J S Garland
    C P Alex
    M R Uhing
    I E Peterside
    A Rentz
    M C Harris
    Journal of Perinatology, 2009, 29 : 808 - 813
  • [2] A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates
    Garland, JS
    Alex, CP
    Mueller, CD
    Otten, D
    Shivpuri, C
    Harris, MC
    Naples, M
    Pellegrini, J
    Buck, RK
    McAuliffe, TL
    Goldmann, DA
    Maki, DG
    PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (06) : 1431 - 1437
  • [3] Randomized clinical trial of preoperative skin antisepsis with chlorhexidine gluconate or povidone-iodine
    Park, H. M.
    Han, S. -S.
    Lee, E. C.
    Lee, S. D.
    Yoon, H. M.
    Eom, B. W.
    Kim, S. H.
    Ryu, K. W.
    Park, S. -J.
    Kim, Y. W.
    Park, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (02) : E145 - E150
  • [4] Prospective randomized trial of 10% povidone-iodine versus 0.5% tincture of chlorhexidine as cutaneous antisepsis for prevention of central venous catheter infection
    Humar, A
    Ostromecki, A
    Direnfeld, J
    Marshall, JC
    Lazar, N
    Houston, PC
    Boiteau, P
    Conly, JM
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2000, 31 (04) : 1001 - 1007
  • [5] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Povidone-Iodine Versus Chlorhexidine Gluconate With Isopropyl Alcohol for Preoperative Vaginal Antisepsis
    Dunn, Debra
    Yannotti, Kara
    Centrella-Nigro, Andrea
    Correa, Stacy
    O'Dea, Denise
    Wiley, Sandra
    AORN JOURNAL, 2024, 119 (04) : 261 - 274
  • [6] Chlorhexidine gluconate vs povidone-iodine vaginal antisepsis for urogynecologic surgery: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial
    Rockefeller, Nicholas F.
    Petersen, Timothy R.
    Komesu, Yuko M.
    Meriwether, Kate
    Dunivan, Gena
    Ninivaggio, Cara
    Jeppson, Peter C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 227 (01) : 66.e1 - 66.e9
  • [7] Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing 10% Povidone-iodine (PI) to a Chlorhexidine Gluconate (CHG) Dressing (BIOPATCH™) for Prevention of Central Venous Catheter (CVC) Related Infections in Neonates † 1440
    J S Garland
    M C Harris
    C P Alex
    C D Mueller
    J W Pellegrini
    R E Buck
    Pediatric Research, 1998, 43 (Suppl 4) : 246 - 246
  • [8] PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF POVIDONE-IODINE (PI) VERSUS CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE (C) FOR PREVENTION OF LOCAL PERIPHERAL INTRAVENOUS CATHETER INFECTIONS (LCI) IN NEONATES
    GARLAND, JS
    BUCK, RK
    MALONEY, P
    GOLDMANN, DA
    PEDIATRIC RESEARCH, 1994, 35 (04) : A226 - A226
  • [9] A Comparison of Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-Iodine for Umbilical Catheter Placement in the Extremely Low Birth-Weight Infant
    Smotrich, Lisa
    ADVANCES IN NEONATAL CARE, 2017, 17 (03) : E19 - E20
  • [10] RCT: TOLERANCE OF CHLORHEXIDINE GLUCONATE VERSUS POVIDONE-IODINE VAGINAL CLEANSING SOLUTION.
    Friedman, J.
    Rastogi, S.
    Glaser, L.
    Lis, C.
    Carter, I.
    Milad, M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2018, 110 (04) : E39 - E40