A qualitative study of factors influencing male participation in fertility research

被引:18
|
作者
Harlow, Alyssa F. [1 ]
Zheng, Amy [1 ]
Nordberg, John [1 ]
Hatch, Elizabeth E. [1 ]
Ransbotham, Sam [2 ]
Wise, Lauren A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 715 Albany St, Boston, MA 02188 USA
[2] Boston Coll, Carroll Sch Management, Dept Informat Syst, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467 USA
关键词
Male fertility; Qualitative research; Male participation; Reproductive health; Research participation; Preconception cohort; MEN; INFERTILITY; PREGNANCY; SEMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s12978-020-01046-y
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background Although fertility is a couple-based outcome, fertility studies typically include far fewer males than females. We know little about which factors facilitate or inhibit male participation in fertility research. In this study we aimed to explore factors that influence male participation in fertility research among North American couples trying to conceive. Methods We conducted a qualitative research study of male participation in Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a prospective preconception cohort of couples actively trying to conceive in Canada and the United States. Between January-August 2019, we carried out 14 online one-on-one in-depth interviews and one online focus group of males and females with varying levels of participation. The in-depth interviews included females who enrolled in PRESTO but declined to invite their male partners to participate (n = 4), males who enrolled in PRESTO (n = 6), and males who declined to participate in PRESTO (n = 4). The focus group included 10 males who enrolled in PRESTO. We analyzed the transcriptions using inductive content analysis. Results Male and female participants perceived that fertility is a women's health issue and is a difficult topic for men to discuss. Men expressed fears of infertility tied to masculinity. However, men were motivated to participate in fertility research to support their partners, provide data that could help others, and to learn more about their own reproductive health. Conclusions Male participation in fertility studies will improve our understanding of male factors contributing to fertility and reproductive health issues. Results indicate a need for more education and health communication on male fertility to normalize male participation in fertility and reproductive health research. Plain English Summary Men are much less likely than women to participate in research on fertility and pregnancy. However, it is important for men to participate in fertility research so that we gain a better understanding of male factors that impact fertility and pregnancy outcomes. In this qualitative study, we interviewed men and women from Canada and the United States who were trying to become pregnant to understand why men choose to participate in fertility research, why men choose not to participate in fertility research, and why women choose not to invite their male partners to participate in fertility research. We found that both men and women believe fertility is a woman's health issue. Men find it difficult to talk about pregnancy and fertility and have fears of infertility tied to masculinity. However, men are motivated to participate in fertility research to support their partners, to help others, and to learn more about their own reproductive health.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Factors Influencing the Research Participation of Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders
    Kaaren Haas
    Debra Costley
    Marita Falkmer
    Amanda Richdale
    Kate Sofronoff
    Torbjörn Falkmer
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2016, 46 : 1793 - 1805
  • [42] Factors Influencing Dental Patient Participation in Biobanking and Biomedical Research
    Hassona, Yazan
    Ahram, Mamoun
    Odeh, Noorah
    Abu Gosh, Mais
    Scully, Crispian
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2016, 25 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [43] Trust in e-participation: an empirical research on the influencing factors
    Santamaria-Philco, Alex
    Wimmer, Maria A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT RESEARCH (DGO 2018): GOVERNANCE IN THE DATA AGE, 2018, : 541 - 550
  • [44] Benefits of Participation in a Longitudinal Qualitative Research Study
    Pam McGrath
    Monash Bioethics Review, 2003, 22 (1) : S63 - S78
  • [45] Factors influencing access to kidney transplantation: a research protocol of a qualitative study on stakeholders' perspectives
    Kloss, Katja
    Ismail, Sohal
    Redeker, Steef
    van Hoogdalem, Lothar
    Luchtenburg, Annemarie
    Busschbach, Jan J. V.
    van de Wetering, Jacqueline
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [46] Fertility preservation in the male pediatric population: factors influencing the decision of parents and children
    Wyns, C.
    Collienne, C.
    Shenfield, F.
    Robert, A.
    Laurent, P.
    Roegiers, L.
    Brichard, B.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 (09) : 2022 - 2030
  • [47] A qualitative investigation of factors influencing participation in bowel screening in New South Wales
    Dawson, Greer
    Crane, Melanie
    Lyons, Claudine
    Burnham, Anna
    Bowman, Tara
    Travaglia, Joanne
    HEALTH PROMOTION JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2016, 27 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [48] The influence of environmental factors on male fertility and its research progress
    Li Zhenmiao
    Wen, Li
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMICS, SOCIAL SCIENCE, ARTS, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING (ESSAEME 2017), 2017, 119 : 142 - 144
  • [49] Factors influencing the degree of participation in surgical decision-making among Chinese patients with prostate cancer: A qualitative research
    Jie Cao
    Chunxue Peng
    Xiaoying Lu
    Lingjun Zhou
    Jing Wu
    Asian Journal of Urology, 2022, (02) : 177 - 185
  • [50] Factors influencing the degree of participation in surgical decision-making among Chinese patients with prostate cancer: A qualitative research
    Cao, Jie
    Peng, Chunxue
    Lu, Xiaoying
    Zhou, Lingjun
    Wu, Jing
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 9 (02) : 177 - 185