Use of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses Among FDA-Approved Biologics

被引:3
|
作者
Ogasawara, Ken [1 ,2 ]
Alexander, G. Caleb [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Ctr Drug Safety & Effectiveness, Baltimore, MD USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD USA
来源
关键词
biologics; label; population pharmacokinetics; special populations; U; S; Food and Drug Administration (FDA); MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES; LABELING DECISIONS; DRUG APPROVAL; IMPACT; JAPANESE;
D O I
10.1002/cpdd.658
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Biologics, especially monoclonal antibodies, are increasingly important in the pharmaceutical marketplace. Population pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses could be useful to guide the need for dose adjustments among special populations, yet it is unknown how commonly such analyses are performed during biologics development. We summarized the characteristics of population PK models of biologics and examined their role in informing the drug labels. To do so, we extracted relevant characteristics of 86 biologics approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research between 2003 and 2017. Ninety-four percent of monoclonal antibodies (51 of 54 biologics), 75% of fusion proteins with Fc receptor (6 of 8 biologics), and 33% of other proteins (8 of 24 biologics) included population PK analyses. Of these analyses, approximately half (45%) used a 2-compartment model with linear clearance as the base model structure. Body size was the most frequently included covariate in the final models (included in 94% of the 64 biologics in which covariate analysis was performed), although age (11%), sex (35%), race (26%), and renal function (27%) were also included in some models. In 70% to 90% of cases in which the effect of these covariates was examined, information regarding the effect of these on PK was included in the label. These results suggest that population PK analyses provide important information about the impact of intrinsic factors on the PK in the label of biologics by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
引用
收藏
页码:914 / 921
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Recent changes to FDA-approved labelling
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2004, 61 (17) : 1766 - 1766
  • [22] Target selection for FDA-approved medicines
    Kinch, Michael S.
    Hoyer, Denton
    Patridge, Eric
    Plummer, Mark
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2015, 20 (07) : 784 - 789
  • [23] Recent changes to FDA-approved labeling
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2002, 59 (09) : 828 - 828
  • [24] Recent changes to FDA-approved labeling
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2005, 62 (12) : 1242 - +
  • [25] Recent changes to FDA-approved labeling
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2003, 60 (08) : 742 - 742
  • [26] Safety of FDA-Approved drugs - Reply
    Friedman, MA
    Woodcock, J
    Lumpkin, MM
    Shuren, JE
    Hass, AE
    Thompson, LJ
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 282 (24): : 2297 - 2298
  • [27] Usability of FDA-Approved Medication Guides
    Wolf, Michael S.
    King, Jennifer
    Wilson, Elizabeth A. H.
    Curtis, Laura M.
    Bailey, Stacy Cooper
    Duhig, James
    Russell, Allison
    Bergeron, Ashley
    Daly, Amanda
    Parker, Ruth M.
    Davis, Terry C.
    Shrank, William H.
    Lambert, Bruce
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (12) : 1714 - 1720
  • [28] Analysis of FDA-approved imaging agents
    Kinch, Michael S.
    Woodard, Pamela K.
    DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2017, 22 (07) : 1077 - 1083
  • [29] FDA-Approved Oligonucleotide Therapies in 2017
    Stein, Cy A.
    Castanotto, Daniela
    MOLECULAR THERAPY, 2017, 25 (05) : 1069 - 1075
  • [30] Recent changes to FDA-approved labeling
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2003, 60 (05) : 418 - 418