Risk stratification following acute myocardial infarction

被引:0
|
作者
Hombach, V
Osterhaus, HH
Höher, M
Scharf, B
Kochs, M
机构
[1] Univ Ulm, Innere Med Abt 2, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
[2] Poliklin Ulm, D-89081 Ulm, Germany
来源
关键词
acute myocardial infarction; sudden cardiac death; risk stratification post-MI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In industrialized countries the rate of sudden cardiac death remains unchanged. The most frequently encountered structural heart disease in these patients is coronary artery disease. Despite the era of thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction patients carry an increased risk of sudden cardiac arrhythmogenic death within a time period of one to two years following the acute event. Therefore, risk stratification post-MI before patient discharge is furthermore mandatory. The spectrum of non-invasive techniques for risk stratification includes the clinical risk profile, measurement of left ventricular global function (LV ejection fraction), the resting ECG (QT dispersion), an ECG stress test (detection and severity of myocardial ischemia), ambulatory ECG monitoring (number and type of ventricular arrhythmias), surface high resolution ECG (detection of ventricular late potentials), measurement of T wave alternans (TWA, alternans ratio), and measurements of the activity and balance of the autonomous nervous system (heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity = BRS). Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) serves as an invasive risk stratification technique (detection of an arrhythmogenic substrate). The prognostic power of the noninvasive techniques is limited; in general, the prognostic value of a negative test is reasonably high (90 to 100 % depending on the test used), whereas the prognostic value of a positive test is rather low (4 to 42 % depending on the test used). Combining several non-invasive tests may significantly improve the positive predictive value above 50 %, but this goes along with a significant decreases of sensitivity below 50 %. Therefore, a combination of several non-invasive tests (detection and exclusion of a large number of low-risk individuals) with the invasive method of PVS (detection of an arrhythmogenic substrate, i.e, a high-risk patient) seems reasonable, as has been convincingly shown by several smaller prognostic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] RISK STRATIFICATION AFTER ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION IN THE ELDERLY
    HANSEN, JF
    NIELSEN, H
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE ELDERLY, 1995, 3 (02): : 73 - 76
  • [22] Noninvasive risk stratification in women with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction
    Desideri, A
    Bigi, R
    Terlizzi, R
    Cortigiani, L
    Suzzi, GL
    Ginocchio, G
    Celegon, L
    Fioretti, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 86 (03): : 333 - +
  • [23] Further Validation of a Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System for Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Sawano, Shinnosuke
    Sakakura, Kenichi
    Yamamoto, Kei
    Taniguchi, Yousuke
    Tsukui, Takunori
    Seguchi, Masaru
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Momomura, Shin-ichi
    Fujita, Hideo
    INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL, 2020, 61 (03) : 463 - 469
  • [24] Novel Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Stratification (nARS) System Reduces the Length of Hospitalization for Acute Myocardial Infarction
    Yamamoto, Kei
    Sakakura, Kenichi
    Akashi, Naoyuki
    Watanabe, Yusuke
    Noguchi, Masamitsu
    Seguchi, Masaru
    Taniguchi, Yousuke
    Ugata, Yusuke
    Wada, Hiroshi
    Momomura, Shin-ichi
    Fujita, Hideo
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2019, 83 (05) : 1039 - 1046
  • [25] Electrophysiologic Testing for Risk Stratification Following Myocardial Infarction: Dead or Alive?
    Wilber, David J.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (08) : 856 - 858
  • [26] RISK STRATIFICATION FOLLOWING MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION USING EXERCISE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
    RYAN, T
    ARMSTRONG, WF
    ODONNELL, JA
    FEIGENBAUM, H
    ROUDEBUSH, RL
    CIRCULATION, 1986, 74 (04) : 12 - 12
  • [27] Risk Stratification in Older Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Physicians' Perspectives
    Feder, Shelli L.
    Schulman-Green, Dena
    Dodson, John A.
    Geda, Mary
    Williams, Kathleen
    Nanna, Michael G.
    Allore, Heather G.
    Murphy, Terrence E.
    Tinetti, Mary E.
    Gill, Thomas M.
    Chaudhry, Sarwat I.
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND HEALTH, 2016, 28 (03) : 387 - 402
  • [28] New biomarkers in the risk stratification of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction
    Rogers B.A.
    Newby L.K.
    Current Cardiology Reports, 2002, 4 (4) : 341 - 347
  • [29] TIMI Risk Score for Acute Myocardial Infarction according to Prognostic Stratification
    Pereira, Jaqueline Locks
    ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2009, 93 (02) : 100 - 106
  • [30] Risk stratification after acute myocardial infarction - Which studies are best?
    Figueredo, VM
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICINE, 1996, 99 (04) : 207 - 214