Project governance in public sector agile software projects

被引:39
|
作者
Lappi, Teemu [1 ]
Aaltonen, Kirsi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oulu, Fac Technol Ind Engn & Management, Oulu, Finland
关键词
Public sector; Project governance; ICT; Agile; Agile project governance; Software projects; SYSTEM PROJECTS; DECISION-MAKING; SUCCESS FACTORS; E-GOVERNMENT; MANAGEMENT; UNCERTAINTY; ENTERPRISE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1108/IJMPB-04-2016-0031
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - Agile methodologies are widely used to manage the technical complexity of software development, and project governance can provide feasible means of organizational support for complex project success. The purpose of this paper is to: analyze the project governance practices of public sector organizations, illustrate what kind of impact these practices have on agile software projects and describe the tensions of agile project governance. Design/methodology/approach - The research is based on qualitative research strategy and applies elaborative logic with analyses of three case projects in the Finnish public sector. Findings - The findings of the research describe how project governance practices can be categorized into six dimensions: business case, contracting, controlling, steering, decision-making and capability building. The results illustrate how these practices either support or detract the performance of agile projects. The results also show that there are two interfaces to agile project that create most tensions to governance - the public sector and technology. Originality/value - The study contributes to both project management and information and communication technology theories by combining technical aspects of agile methodologies with micro-level project governance practices. The study also adds original value to academics by introducing the new concept of "agile project governance." The results of this study will allow public sector project organizations to design appropriate governance mechanisms for agile projects, and to identify the challenges and tensions that need to be considered and managed in the process.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 294
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The governance of the public sector
    Bailey, A
    [J]. POLITICAL QUARTERLY, 2003, 74 (02): : 158 - 163
  • [22] Evaluating the Benefits of Systematic Project Management in Large Public Sector Projects
    Guzman, Liliana
    Steinbach, Silke
    Diebold, Philipp
    Zehler, Thomas
    Schneider, Klaus
    Habbe, Matthias
    [J]. 2016 IEEE/ACM 4TH INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON CONDUCTING EMPIRICAL STUDIES IN INDUSTRY (CESI), 2016, : 32 - 35
  • [23] Governance and the public sector
    Fenwick, John
    [J]. PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, 2008, 61 (04) : 709 - 712
  • [24] Investigating the Practices of Project Governance in Public Sector Infrastructure Program in Pakistan
    Khan, Asadullah
    Waris, Muhammad
    Ismail, Ishak
    Sajid, Mirza Rizwan
    Ali, Zaigham
    Ullah, Mahfooz
    Hussain, Ammar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 2019
  • [25] Public sector governance and the finance sector
    Carmichael, J
    [J]. FINANCIAL SECTOR GOVERNANCE: THE ROLES OF THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTORS, 2002, : 121 - 162
  • [26] A dependency taxonomy for agile software development projects
    Diane E. Strode
    [J]. Information Systems Frontiers, 2016, 18 : 23 - 46
  • [27] Modified Agile Practices for Outsourced Software Projects
    Batra, Dinesh
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2009, 52 (09) : 143 - 148
  • [28] An Approach to Software Architecting in Agile Software Development Projects in Education
    Angelov, Samuil
    de Beer, Patrick
    [J]. SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE (ECSA 2015), 2015, 9278 : 157 - 168
  • [29] Barriers to Learning in Agile Software Development Projects
    Babb, Jeffry S.
    Hoda, Rashina
    Norbjerg, Jacob
    [J]. AGILE PROCESSES IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING AND EXTREME PROGRAMMING, XP 2013, 2013, 149 : 1 - 15
  • [30] Agile Project Management: Better Deliveries to the End User in Software Projects with a Management Model by Scrum
    Almeida, Hugo
    Correia, Walter
    [J]. ADVANCES IN USABILITY, USER EXPERIENCE AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 794 : 293 - 305