Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Measurements in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Preliminary Study of the Effect of Region of Interest on ADC Values and Interobserver Variability

被引:49
|
作者
Ma, Chao [1 ]
Liu, Li [1 ]
Li, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Li [1 ]
Chen, Lu-guang [1 ]
Zhang, Yong [2 ]
Chen, Shi-yue [1 ]
Lu, Jian-ping [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changhai Hosp Shanghai, Dept Radiol, 168 Changhai Rd, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[2] GE Healthcare, MR Grp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
上海市自然科学基金;
关键词
FORMING CHRONIC-PANCREATITIS; WEIGHTED IMAGING DWI; B-VALUE; FOCAL PANCREATITIS; RECTAL-CANCER; CARCINOMA; MRI; DIFFERENTIATION; MASS; REPRODUCIBILITY;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.25007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To assess the influence of region of interest (ROI) on tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements and interobserver variability in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Materials and Methods: Twenty-two patients recruited with pathology-proven PDAC underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI, 3.0T) prior to the surgical resection. Two independent readers measured tumor ADCs according to three ROI methods: whole-volume, single-slice, and small solid sample of tumor. Minimum and mean ADCs were obtained. The interobserver variability for each of the three methods was analyzed using interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. The minimum and mean ADCs among the ROI methods were compared using nonparametric tests. Results: The single-slice ROI method showed the best reproducibility in the minimum ADC measurements (mean difference+/-limits of agreement between two readers were 0.025+/-0.25 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; ICC, 0.92) among the three ROI methods. For the solid tumor sample ROI, both minimum ADC and mean ADC measurements reproducibility were the worst, with limits of agreement up to +/-0.50 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s and +/-0.32 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, respectively (ICCs, 0.41/0.58). Both the minimum and mean ADCs demonstrated significant differences among the three ROI methods (both P<0.001). The post-hoc analyses results showed no significant difference with regard to the mean ADCs between whole-volume and single-slice ROI methods (P=0.14). Conclusion: The ROI method had a considerable influence on both the minimum and mean ADC values and the interobserver variability in PDAC. The worst interobserver variability was observed for both the minimum and mean ADCs derived from small solid-sample ROI.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 413
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values as an imaging biomarker for fibrosis in pediatric Crohn’s disease: preliminary experience
    A. Kovanlikaya
    D. Beneck
    M. Rose
    P. Renjen
    A. Dunning
    A. Solomon
    R. Sockolow
    P. W. Brill
    Abdominal Imaging, 2015, 40 : 1068 - 1074
  • [22] Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values as an imaging biomarker for fibrosis in pediatric Crohn's disease: preliminary experience
    Kovanlikaya, A.
    Beneck, D.
    Rose, M.
    Renjen, P.
    Dunning, A.
    Solomon, A.
    Sockolow, R.
    Brill, P. W.
    ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (05): : 1068 - 1074
  • [23] Relative Contribution of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values and ADC Ratios of Focal Hepatic Lesions in the Characterization of Benign and Malignant Lesions
    Yilmaz, Feyza Gelebek
    Yildirim, Abdullah Emre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF THERAPEUTICS, 2018, 24 (03): : 150 - 157
  • [24] Is It Better to Include Necrosis in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Measurements? The Necrosis/Wall ADC Ratio to Differentiate Malignant and Benign Necrotic Lung Lesions: Preliminary Results
    Karaman, Adem
    Durur-Subasi, Irmak
    Alper, Fatih
    Durur-Karakaya, Afak
    Subasi, Mahmut
    Akgun, Metin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2017, 46 (04) : 1001 - 1006
  • [25] The Role of Parallel Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Map Values for Evaluating Breast Lesions: Preliminary Results
    Jin, Guangwei
    An, Ningyu
    Jacobs, Michael A.
    Li, Kuncheng
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2010, 17 (04) : 456 - 463
  • [26] Calculating eGFR Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values Obtained Through MR Imaging
    Kanpittaya, Jaturat
    Jaimook, Patrawan
    Thongkrau, Theerayut
    Keeratikasikorn, Chaiyapon
    Sawanyawisuth, Kittisak
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 15 (01)
  • [27] MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values as a Predictive Biomarker on the Outcomes of Chemoradiotherapy in Carcinoma Cervix
    Wilson, J.
    Chandramohan, A.
    Reddy, J. K.
    John, R. A.
    Sathyamurthy, A.
    John, N. O.
    Mani, T.
    Ram, T. S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E625 - E625
  • [28] 3 Tesla Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values of Thyroid Nodules: Prediction of Benignancy and Malignancy
    Bayraktaroglu, Selen
    Ozturk, Pinar Karakan
    Ceylan, Naim
    Makay, Ozer
    Icoz, Gokhan
    Ertan, Yesim
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 16 (03)
  • [29] Comparison of Absolute Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values in ADC Maps Generated Across Different Postprocessing Software: Reproducibility in Endometrial Carcinoma
    Ghosh, Adarsh
    Singh, Tulika
    Singla, Veenu
    Bagga, Rashmi
    Khandelwal, Niranjan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2017, 209 (06) : 1312 - 1320
  • [30] Intraobserver and interobserver variability in the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) of breast tumours
    Petralia, G.
    Bonello, L.
    Summers, P.
    Preda, L.
    Malasevschi, A.
    Raimondi, S.
    Di Filippi, R.
    Locatelli, M.
    Curigliano, G.
    Renne, G.
    Bellomi, M.
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2011, 116 (03): : 466 - 476