Influence of intravenous contrast agent on dose calculations of intensity modulated radiation therapy plans for head and neck cancer

被引:49
|
作者
Choi, Youngmin
Kim, Jeung-Kee
Lee, Hyung-Sik
Hur, Won-Joo
Hong, Young-Seoub
Park, Sungkwang
Ahn, Kijung
Cho, Heunglae
机构
[1] Dong A Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pusan 602175, South Korea
[2] Dong A Univ Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Prevent Med, Pusan 602175, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Pusan, South Korea
关键词
contrast agent; dose calculation; intensity modulated radiation therapy; head and neck cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2006.09.010
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: To evaluate the effect of an intravenous contrast agent (CA) on dose calculations and its clinical significance in intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans for head and neck cancer. Materials and methods: Fifteen patients with head and neck cancer and involved neck nodes were enrolled. Each patient took two sets of computerized tomography (CT) in the same position before and after intravenous CA injections. Target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) were contoured on the enhanced CT, and then an IMRT plan of nine equiangular beams with a 6 MV X-ray was created. After the fusion of non-enhanced and enhanced CTs, the contours and the IMRT plan created from the enhanced CT were copied and placed to the non-enhanced CT. Doses were calculated again from the non-enhanced CT by the same IMRT plan. The radiation doses calculated from the two sets of CTs were compared with regard to planning target volumes (PTV) and the three OARs, both parotid glands and the spinal cord, by Wilcoxon's signed rank test. Results: The doses (maximum, mean, and the dose of 95% of PTV received (D-95%)) of PTV70 and PTV59.4 calculated from the enhanced CTs were lower than those from the non-enhanced CTs (p < 0.05), but the dose differences were less than 1% compared to the doses calculated from the enhanced CTs. The doses of PTV50.4, parotid glands, and spinal cord were not significantly different between the non-enhanced and enhanced CTs. Conclusions: The difference between the doses calculated from the CTs with and without CA enhancement was tolerably small, therefore using intravenous CA could be recommended for the planning CT of head and neck IMRT. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 162
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Intensity modulated radiation therapy for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma
    Wolden, SL
    Wexler, L
    Kraus, D
    La Quaglia, M
    Lis, E
    Meyers, P
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01): : S246 - S247
  • [22] Planning comparison between intensity modulated radiation therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy in a case of head and neck cancer
    Nguyen, T. T. C.
    Nguyen, B. T.
    Mai, N. V.
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE AND EDUCATION 2017 (ICMSE2017), 2018, 983
  • [23] Adaptive Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer: Is it Affordable?
    Vanderstraeten, B.
    Berwouts, D.
    Goddeeris, B.
    Duprez, F.
    De Neve, W.
    Lievens, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2014, 90 : S107 - S108
  • [24] Limited Toxicity of Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
    Mayo, Zachary S.
    Ilori, Evelyn O.
    Matia, Brian
    Smile, Timothy D.
    Fleming, Christopher W.
    Reddy, Chandana A.
    Scharpf, Joseph
    Lamarre, Eric D.
    Prendes, Brandon L.
    Ku, Jamie
    Burkey, Brian B.
    Joshi, Nikhil P.
    Woody, Neil M.
    Koyfman, Shlomo A.
    Campbell, Shauna R.
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 42 (04) : 1845 - 1849
  • [25] The Effect of Intravenous Contrast on Photon Radiation Therapy Dose Calculations for Lung Cancer
    Shi, Wenyin
    Liu, Chihray
    Lu, Bo
    Yeung, Anamaria
    Newlin, Heather E.
    Amdur, Robert J.
    Olivier, Kenneth R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2010, 33 (02): : 153 - 156
  • [26] Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Tarita O Thomas
    Tamer Refaat
    Mehee Choi
    Ian Bacchus
    Sean Sachdev
    Alfred W Rademaker
    Vythialingam Sathiaseelan
    Achilles Karagianis
    Bharat B Mittal
    Radiation Oncology, 10
  • [27] Brachial plexus dose tolerance in head and neck cancer patients treated with sequential intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Thomas, Tarita O.
    Refaat, Tamer
    Choi, Mehee
    Bacchus, Ian
    Sachdev, Sean
    Rademaker, Alfred W.
    Sathiaseelan, Vythialingam
    Karagianis, Achilles
    Mittal, Bharat B.
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [28] Predicting Differences in Planned and Delivered Dose for Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy
    Reese, A. S.
    Hou, J.
    Suntharalingam, M.
    D'Souza, W. D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S800 - S800
  • [29] Neck Spasms as a Late Effect of Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Head and Neck Cancer
    Gelblum, D.
    Wolden, S.
    Schupak, K.
    Lee, N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S550 - S550
  • [30] Intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck carcinoma
    Gregoire, Vincent
    De Neve, Wilfried
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Lee, Nancy
    Van den Weyngaert, Danielle
    Van Gestel, Dirk
    ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (05): : 555 - 564