Stages of abstraction and exemplar memorization in pigeon category learning

被引:58
|
作者
Cook, Robert G. [1 ]
Smith, J. David
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Psychol, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Psychol, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
[3] SUNY Buffalo, Ctr Cognit Sci, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01833.x
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It has been proposed that human category learning consists of an early abstraction-based stage followed by a later exemplar-memorization stage. To investigate whether similar processing stages extend to category learning in a nonverbal species, we applied a prototype-exception paradigm to investigating pigeon category learning. Five birds and 8 humans learned six-dimensional perceptual categories constructed to include prototypes, typical items, and exceptions. We evaluated the birds' and humans' categorization strategies at different points during learning. Early on in both species, prototype performance improved rapidly as exception performance remained below chance, indicating an initial mastery of the categories' general structure. Later on, exception performance improved selectively and dramatically, indicating exception-item resolution and exemplar memorization. Abstraction- and exemplar-based formal models reinforced these interpretations. The results suggest a psychological transition in pigeon category learning from abstraction- to exemplar-based processing similar to that found in humans.
引用
收藏
页码:1059 / 1067
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The exemplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: Moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations
    Zulkiply, Norehan
    Burt, Jennifer S.
    [J]. MEMORY & COGNITION, 2013, 41 (01) : 16 - 27
  • [32] RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ITEM AND CATEGORY LEARNING - EVIDENCE THAT ABSTRACTION IS NOT AUTOMATIC
    MEDIN, DL
    DEWEY, GI
    MURPHY, TD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1983, 9 (04) : 607 - 625
  • [33] SEQL: Category learning as progressive abstraction using structure mapping
    Kuehne, SE
    Forbus, KD
    Gentner, D
    Quinn, B
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2000, : 770 - 775
  • [34] Learning and Memorization
    Chatterjee, Satrajit
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 80, 2018, 80
  • [35] Cue abstraction and exemplar memory in categorization
    Juslin, P
    Jones, S
    Olsson, H
    Winman, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2003, 29 (05) : 924 - 941
  • [36] Individual differences in exemplar-based interference during instructed category learning
    Noelle, DC
    Cottrell, GW
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-SECOND ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE COGNITIVE SCIENCE SOCIETY, 2000, : 358 - 363
  • [37] The Effects of Age on Category Learning and Prototype- and Exemplar-Based Generalization
    Bowman, Caitlin R.
    Iwashita, Takako
    Zeithamova, Dagmar
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2022, 37 (07) : 800 - 815
  • [38] Does practice in category learning increase rule use or exemplar use—or both?
    Jean-Pierre Thibaut
    Sabine Gelaes
    Gregory L. Murphy
    [J]. Memory & Cognition, 2018, 46 : 530 - 543
  • [39] Pigeon Category Learning: Revisiting the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) Tasks
    Navarro, Victor M.
    Jani, Ridhi
    Wasserman, Edward A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-ANIMAL LEARNING AND COGNITION, 2019, 45 (02) : 174 - 184
  • [40] A probabilistic account of exemplar and category generation
    Jern, Alan
    Kemp, Charles
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 66 (01) : 85 - 125