Differences in Motor Control Strategies of Jumping Tasks, as Revealed by Group and Individual Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Cushion, Emily J. [1 ]
North, Jamie S. [1 ]
Cleather, Daniel J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] St Marys Univ, Fac Sport Hlth & Appl Sci, Twickenham, England
[2] Inst Globally Distributed Open Res & Educ IGDORE, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
principal component analysis; vertical jumping; degrees of freedom; single-subject analysis;
D O I
10.1080/00222895.2021.1886036
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to investigate the motor control strategies adopted when performing two jumping tasks with different task demands when analysed at an individual and group level. Twenty-two healthy individuals performed two jumping tasks: jumping without the use of an arm swing (CMJnas) and jumping starting in a plantar flexed position with the use of an arm swing (PF). Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using hip, knee and ankle joint moment data on individual (PCAi) and group data (PCAc). The results demonstrate that a greater number of PCs are required to explain the majority of variance within the dataset in the PF condition at both an individual and group level, compared to CMJnas condition. Although common control strategies were observed between the two jumping conditions, differences in the organisation of the movement (PC loading coefficients) were observed. Results from the group analysis did not completely reflect the individual strategies used to perform each jumping task and highlight the value in performing individual analysis to determine emergent control strategies.
引用
收藏
页码:44 / 56
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Control over task conflict in the stroop and affordances tasks: an individual differences study
    Ran Littman
    Eyal Kalanthroff
    Psychological Research, 2021, 85 : 2420 - 2427
  • [22] Understanding individual differences in lifting mechanics: Do some people adopt motor control strategies that minimize biomechanical exposure
    Armstrong, Daniel P.
    Fischer, Steven L.
    HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2020, 74
  • [23] A Comparison of Motor Unit Control Strategies between Two Different Isometric Tasks
    Jeon, Sunggun
    Miller, William M.
    Ye, Xin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (08)
  • [24] Motor Control Accuracy: A Consequential Probe of Individual Differences in Emotion Regulation
    Bresin, Konrad
    Fetterman, Adam K.
    Robinson, Michael D.
    EMOTION, 2012, 12 (03) : 479 - 486
  • [25] Inter-Individual Differences in Cognitive Tasks: Focusing on the Shaping of Decision-Making Strategies
    Pittaras, Elsa
    Hamelin, Heloise
    Granon, Sylvie
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2022, 16
  • [26] Individual Differences in Subconscious Motor Control Predicted by GABA Concentration in SMA
    Boy, Frederic
    Evans, C. John
    Edden, Richard A. E.
    Singh, Krish D.
    Husain, Masud
    Sumner, Petroc
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (19) : 1779 - 1785
  • [27] Web search strategies and human individual differences: A combined analysis
    Ford, N
    Miller, D
    Moss, N
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 56 (07): : 757 - 764
  • [28] ANALYSIS OF INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN WORK SITUATIONS - PROCEDURES AND STRATEGIES
    VANDELEEMPUT, C
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 27 (3-4) : 361 - 361
  • [29] Modality matters: Three auditory conflict tasks to measure individual differences in attention control
    Burgoyne, Alexander P.
    Seeburger, Dolly T.
    Engle, Randall W.
    BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2024, 56 (06) : 5959 - 5985
  • [30] LATERALIZED SENSITIVITY TO VIBROTACTILE STIMULATION - INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES REVEALED BY INTERACTION OF THRESHOLD AND SIGNAL-DETECTION TASKS
    RHODES, DL
    SCHWARTZ, GE
    NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1981, 19 (06) : 831 - 835