Innovative energy technologies and climate policy in Germany

被引:26
|
作者
Schumacher, Katja
Sands, Ronald D.
机构
[1] German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
[2] Joint Global Change Res Inst, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
关键词
climate policy; general equilibrium modeling; CO2 capture and storage;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2005.09.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Due to the size and structure of its economy, Germany is one of the largest carbon emitters in the European Union. However, Germany is facing a major renewal and restructuring process in electricity generation. Within the next two decades, up to 50% of current electricity generation capacity may retire because of end-of-plant lifetime and the nuclear phase-out pact of 1998. Substantial opportunities, therefore, exist for deployment of advanced electricity generating technologies in both a projected baseline and in alternative carbon policy scenarios. We simulate the potential role of coal integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC), natural gas combined cycle (NGCC), carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS), and wind power within a computable general equilibrium model of Germany from the present through 2050. These advanced technologies and their role within a future German electricity system are the focus of this paper. We model the response of greenhouse gas emissions in Germany to various technology and carbon policy assumptions over the next few decades. In our baseline scenario, all of the advanced technologies except CCS provide substantial contributions to electricity generation. We also calculate the carbon price where each fossil technology, combined with CCS, becomes competitive. Constant carbon price experiments are used to characterize the model response to a carbon policy. This provides an estimate of the cost of meeting an emissions target, and the share of emissions reductions available from the electricity generation sector. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3929 / 3941
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] POLICY WATCH: Energy security vs climate policy
    van Renssen, Sonja
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 4 (09) : 756 - 757
  • [42] Role of energy technologies in response to climate change
    Shamoon, Ahmad
    Haleem, Abid
    Bahl, Shashi
    Javaid, Mohd
    Garg, Sonu Bala
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 62 : 63 - 69
  • [43] Role of energy technologies in response to climate change
    Shamoon, Ahmad
    Haleem, Abid
    Bahl, Shashi
    Javaid, Mohd
    Garg, Sonu Bala
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 62 : 63 - 69
  • [44] Climate change integrated with energy policy
    不详
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 2002, 98 (01) : 23 - 23
  • [45] Energy economics and climate policy modeling
    Zhimin Huang
    Yi-Ming Wei
    Ke Wang
    Hua Liao
    [J]. Annals of Operations Research, 2017, 255 : 1 - 7
  • [46] Evidence reviews in energy and climate policy
    Warren, Peter
    [J]. EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2020, 16 (01): : 83 - 98
  • [47] Energy and climate economics and policy INTRODUCTION
    Zhang, ZhongXiang
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY STUDIES, 2015, 17 (02) : 179 - 183
  • [48] Countercyclical energy and climate policy for the US
    Nemet, Gregory F.
    Grubler, Arnulf
    Kammen, Daniel M.
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2016, 7 (01) : 5 - 12
  • [49] EFFECTS OF CLIMATE ON ENERGY-POLICY
    WILLIAMS, J
    [J]. ELECTRONICS AND POWER, 1978, 24 (04): : 261 - 268
  • [50] Energy policy and climate change in Turkey
    Kaygusuz, K
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 44 (10) : 1671 - 1688