Governance by algorithms: reality construction by algorithmic selection on the Internet

被引:155
|
作者
Just, Natascha [1 ]
Latzer, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich, Andreasstr 15, CH-8050 Zurich, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
algorithms; (co-)evolutionary innovation studies; governance by software; institutionalism; Internet; reality construction; social order; technology as institution; MEDIA; INFORMATION; COMPETITION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1177/0163443716643157
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This article explores the governance by algorithms in information societies. Theoretically, it builds on (co-)evolutionary innovation studies in order to adequately grasp the interplay of technological and societal change and combines these with institutional approaches to incorporate governance by technology or rather software as institutions. Methodologically, it draws from an empirical survey of Internet-based services that rely on automated algorithmic selection, a functional typology derived from it, and an analysis of associated potential social risks. It shows how algorithmic selection has become a growing source of social order, of a shared social reality in information societies. It argues that - similar to the construction of realities by traditional mass media - automated algorithmic selection applications shape daily lives and realities, affect the perception of the world, and influence behavior. However, the co-evolutionary perspective on algorithms as institutions, ideologies, intermediaries, and actors highlights differences that are to be found, first, in the growing personalization of constructed realities and, second, in the constellation of involved actors. Altogether, compared to reality construction by traditional mass media, algorithmic reality construction tends to increase individualization, commercialization, inequalities, and deterritorialization and to decrease transparency, controllability, and predictability.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 258
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Digital Algorithms for the Discrete Frequency Selection of Signals that Do Not Use Algorithmic Multiplication Operations
    Burova, Adeliya Yu.
    Usatenko, Timur O.
    [J]. TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS, 2020, 9 (02): : 501 - 506
  • [22] Construction, intuition: Algorithmic
    Nake F.
    [J]. Informatik Spektrum, 2021, 44 (1) : 3 - 10
  • [23] Where is the governance in Internet governance?
    van Eeten, Michel J. G.
    Mueller, Milton
    [J]. NEW MEDIA & SOCIETY, 2013, 15 (05) : 720 - 736
  • [24] Algorithmic Foundations of the Internet:: Roundup
    López-Ortiz, A
    [J]. COMBINATORIAL AND ALGORITHMIC ASPECTS OF NETWORKING, 2005, 3405 : 192 - 204
  • [25] Algorithmic foundations of the internet:: Foreword
    López-Ortiz, A
    [J]. COMBINATORIAL AND ALGORITHMIC ASPECTS OF NETWORKING, 2005, 3405 : 155 - 158
  • [26] Co-designing algorithms for governance: Ensuring responsible and accountable algorithmic management of refugee camp supplies
    Dekker, Rianne
    Koot, Paul
    Birbil, S. Ilker
    Andres, Mark van Embden
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2022, 9 (01):
  • [27] Internet governance
    [J]. Internet Governance: A Grand Collaboration, 2004, 5 : 254 - 259
  • [28] Algorithmic analysis of multithreaded algorithms
    Leiserson, CE
    [J]. ALGORITHMS AND COMPUTATION, PROCEEDINGS, 1997, 1350 : 132 - 132
  • [29] From algorithmic governance to govern algorithm
    Xu, Zichun
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (03) : 1141 - 1150
  • [30] The Siren Song: Algorithmic Governance by Blockchain
    Werbach, Kevin
    [J]. AFTER THE DIGITAL TORNADO: NETWORKS, ALGORITHMS, HUMANITY, 2020, : 215 - 239