The immunogenicity and protection effect of an inactivated coxsackievirus A6, A10, and A16 vaccine against hand, foot, and mouth disease

被引:48
|
作者
Lim, Heeji [1 ,4 ,5 ]
In, Hyun Ju [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Lee, Jung-Ah [2 ]
Yoo, Jung Sik [1 ]
Lee, Sang-Won [3 ]
Chung, Gyung Tae [1 ]
Choi, Young Ki [4 ,5 ]
Chung, Jae Keun [6 ]
Cho, Sun Ju [6 ]
Lee, June-Woo [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Hlth, Div Vaccine Res, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Inst Hlth, Div Emerging Infect Dis & Vector Res, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Div Strateg Planning Emerging Infect Dis, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[4] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Coll Med, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[5] Chungbuk Natl Univ, Med Res Inst, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk, South Korea
[6] Hlth & Environm Res Inst Gwangju, Div Infect Dis Invest, Gwangju 61986, South Korea
关键词
Coxsackievirus; Inactivated vaccine; Multivalent; ENTEROVIRUS; 71; OUTBREAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.005
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Coxsackievirus belongs to the Enterovirus genus of the Picornaviridae family and is one of the major pathogens associated with human hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Historically, outbreaks of HFMD have mainly been caused by enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16. Recently, coxsackieviruses A6 and A10 have been associated with increased occurrences of sporadic HFMD cases and outbreak events globally. In this study, the immunogenicity of coxsackieviruses A6, A10, and A16 (CA6, CA10, and CA16), which were inactivated by formalin or beta-propiolactone (BPL) under different conditions, was evaluated as multivalent vaccine candidates. CA6 induced similar immune responses with both inactivation methods, and the immune efficacy of CA10 and CA16 was better following inactivation with BPL than with formalin. There was no sufficient cross-reactivity or cross-protectivity against heterologous strains in groups vaccinated with the BPL-inactivated (BI) monovalent vaccine. Sufficient neutralizing antibody and cell-mediated immune responses were induced in the BI-trivalent vaccinated group. These findings suggest that BI-CA6, CA10, and CA16 are potential multivalent vaccine candidates and that a multivalent vaccine is needed to control HFMD. The coxsackievirus multivalent vaccine could be useful for the development of effective HFMD vaccines. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3445 / 3452
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Characterization of coxsackievirus A10 strains isolated from children with hand, foot, and mouth disease
    Zhang, Jie
    Xu, Danhan
    Liu, Hongbo
    Zhang, Ming
    Feng, Changzeng
    Cong, Shanri
    Sun, Hao
    Yang, Zhaoqing
    Ma, Shaohui
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 94 (02) : 601 - 609
  • [32] Hand, foot, and mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A10: more serious than it seems
    Bian, Lianlian
    Gao, Fan
    Mao, Qunying
    Sun, Shiyang
    Wu, Xing
    Liu, Siyuan
    Yang, Xiaoming
    Liang, Zhenglun
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2019, 17 (04) : 233 - 242
  • [33] Outbreak of hand, foot and mouth disease/herpangina associated with coxsackievirus A6 and A10 infections in 2010, France: a large citywide, prospective observational study
    Mirand, A.
    Henquell, C.
    Archimbaud, C.
    Ughetto, S.
    Antona, D.
    Bailly, J-L
    Peigue-Lafeuille, H.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2012, 18 (05) : E110 - E118
  • [34] Coxsackieviruses A6 and A16 associated with hand, foot, and mouth disease in Vietnam, 2008-2017: Essential information for rational vaccine design
    Hoa-Tran, Thi Nguyen
    Dao, Anh Thi Hai
    Nguyen, Anh The
    Kataoka, Chikako
    Takemura, Taichiro
    Pham, Chau Ha
    Vu, Hung Manh
    Hong, Ta Thi Thu
    Ha, Nguyen Thi Viet
    Duong, Tran Nhu
    Thanh, Nguyen Thi Hien
    Shimizu, Hiroyuki
    VACCINE, 2020, 38 (52) : 8273 - 8285
  • [35] Basic Reproduction Number of Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 and A6: Evidence From Outbreaks of Hand, Foot, and Mouth Disease in China Between 2011 and 2018
    Zhang, Zhong
    Liu, Yang
    Liu, Fengfeng
    Ren, Minrui
    Nie, Taoran
    Cui, Jinzhao
    Chang, Zhaorui
    Li, Zhongjie
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2021, 73 (09) : E2552 - E2559
  • [36] Identification of a novel Indian clade of Coxsackievirus A16 in Hand, Foot and Mouth disease outbreak in 2022
    Mamidi, Prabhudutta
    Mishra, Baijayantimala
    Panda, Sailendra
    Ray, Amrita
    Jena, Deepak
    Biswas, Viplov Kumar
    Laha, Eshna
    Mohanty, Monalisa
    Chattopadhyay, Soma
    Raghav, Sunil
    Kar, Bikash Ranjan
    Nayak, Manoj
    Mandal, Madhab Charan
    Santra, Debashis
    Dwibedi, Bhagirathi
    Gupta, Kavita
    FUTURE VIROLOGY, 2024,
  • [37] Detection of human enterovirus 71 and coxsackievirus A16 in children with hand, foot and mouth disease in China
    Chen, Ling
    Mou, Xiaozhou
    Zhang, Qiong
    Li, Yifei
    Lin, Jian
    Liu, Fanlong
    Yuan, Li
    Tang, Yiming
    Xiang, Charlie
    MOLECULAR MEDICINE REPORTS, 2012, 5 (04) : 1001 - 1004
  • [38] Hand, foot and mouth disease caused by Coxsackie viruses A6 and A16 in Assam, Northeast India: A need for surveillance
    Borkakoty, Biswajyoti
    Das, Mandakini
    Jakharia, Aniruddha
    Bhattacharya, Chandrakanta
    Bora, Chandrajyoti
    Baruah, Pranjal Jyoti
    Biswas, Dipankar
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY VENEREOLOGY & LEPROLOGY, 2020, 86 (01):
  • [39] Atypical hand, foot, and mouth disease caused by coxsackievirus A6 in children with atopic dermatitis
    Bae, I.
    Shin, B. S.
    Kim, M.
    Na, C.
    Choi, H.
    JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2019, 33 : 45 - 45
  • [40] An Atypical Dermatologic Presentation of a Child With Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease Caused by Coxsackievirus A6
    Chong, Jin Ho
    Aan, Mark Koh Jean
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 2014, 33 (08) : 889 - 889