Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of an innovative component for refrigeration units

被引：16

作者：

Gasia, Jaume ^{[1
]}

Fabiani, Claudia ^{[2
,3
]}

Chafer, Marta ^{[1
,2
,3
]}

Pisello, Anna Laura ^{[2
,3
]}

Manni, Agnese ^{[4
]}

Ascani, Maurizio ^{[4
]}

Cabeza, Luisa F. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Lleida, INSPIRES Res Ctr, GREiA Res Grp, Pere Cabrera S-N, Lleida 25001, Spain

[2] Univ Perugia, CIRIAF Interuniv Res Ctr, Via G Duranti 67, I-06125 Perugia, Italy

[3] Univ Perugia, Dept Engn, Perugia, Italy

[4] Turboalgor Srl, Perugia, Italy

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION | 2021年 / 295卷

关键词：

Life cycle assessment (LCA); Environmental impact; ReCiPe; Life cycle costing (LCC); Net present value (NPV); Industrial refrigeration; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; SYSTEM; WASTE; FRAMEWORK; LCA;

D O I：

10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126442

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle costing (LCC) are innovative tools based on an innovative approach allowing to investigate the environmental and economic burdens of a product or service throughout its lifecycle. Although usually carried out individually, their integration in a comprehensive analysis could provide a substantial asset in every kind of decision-making procedures. In this study, the sustainability of a newly developed component for refrigeration units is investigated by applying these two tools in a cradle to grave approach in different scenarios. Results from the LCA show the huge impact associated with the manufacturing process of the kit compared to the transport. However, the use phase environmental analysis showed an environmental payback period always lower than 10 years. Results from the LCC show that the initial investment cost represents the highest share for the final user. Furthermore, favourable discounted payback periods are generally found, leading to net savings above 270,000 V in the case best-case scenario. ? 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页数：17

共 50 条

[21] Life Cycle Costing Assessment-Based Approach for Selection of Wastewater Treatment Units
Rawal, Nekram
Duggal, S. K.
[J]. NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA, 2016, 39 (02): : 103 - 107
[22] Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of hydrogen production from biowaste and biomass in Sweden
Arfan, Muhammad
Eriksson, Ola
Wang, Zhao
Soam, Shveta
[J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 291
[23] Integrated life cycle assessment and activity based life cycle costing approach for an automotive product
Shama, M. S.
Vinodh, S.
Jayakrishna, K.
[J]. SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2015, 22 (03) : 1179 - 1188
[24] A hybridised framework combining integrated methods for environmental Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing
Miah, J. H.
Koh, S. C. L.
Stone, D.
[J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 168 : 846 - 866
[25] Life cycle costing as part of a life cycle sustainability assessment of products: methodology and case studies
Bachmann, Till M.
van der Kamp, Jonathan
Bianchi, Marco
Pihkola, Hanna
del Oso, Mateo Saavedra
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (10): : 1863 - 1879
[26] Life Cycle Costing Assessment-Based Approach for Selection of Wastewater Treatment Units
Nekram Rawal
S. K. Duggal
[J]. National Academy Science Letters, 2016, 39 : 103 - 107
[27] Life Cycle Costing for Engineers
Gransberg, Douglas
[J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2010, 28 (10) : 1113 - 1114
[28] LIFE-CYCLE COSTING
OCONNELL, LE
[J]. CME-CHARTERED MECHANICAL ENGINEER, 1983, 30 (09): : 14 - 14
[29] LIFE-CYCLE COSTING
PAUL, BO
[J]. CHEMICAL PROCESSING, 1994, 57 (12): : 79 - &
[30] Life cycle costing for a design life standard
Bennett, AF
Page, IC
Bourke, K
Tucker, SN
Nireki, T
[J]. DURABILITY OF BUILDING MATERIALS AND COMPONENTS 8, VOLS 1-4, PROCEEDINGS, 1999, : 1509 - 1517

← 1 2 3 4 5 →