Systematic Review of the Volume-Outcome Relationship for Radical Prostatectomy

被引:63
|
作者
Leow, Jeffrey J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Leong, Eugene K. [4 ]
Serrell, Emily C. [5 ]
Chang, Steven L. [1 ,2 ]
Gruen, Russell L. [4 ]
Png, Keng Siang [3 ]
Beaule, Lisa T. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Quoc-Dien Trinh [1 ,2 ]
Menon, Mani M. [8 ]
Sammond, Jesse D. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Urol Surg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Ctr Surg & Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Tan Tock Seng Hosp, Dept Urol, Singapore, Singapore
[4] Nanyang Technol Univ Singapore, Lee Kong Chian Sch Med, Imperial Coll London, Singapore, Singapore
[5] Tufts Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[6] Maine Med Ctr, Div Urol, 509 Forest Ave,Suite 200, Portland, ME 04101 USA
[7] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, 509 Forest Ave,Suite 200, Portland, ME 04101 USA
[8] Henry Ford Hlth Syst, VUI Ctr Outcomes Res Analyt & Evaluat, Detroit, MI USA
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2018年 / 4卷 / 06期
关键词
Volume; Caseload; Outcomes; Complications; Mortality; Survival; Radical prostatectomy; Prostate cancer; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; HOSPITAL VOLUME; SURGEON VOLUME; CANCER-SURGERY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; COMPLICATION RATES; PATIENT OUTCOMES; RESOURCE USE; IMPACT; MORTALITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2017.03.008
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Radical prostatectomy (RP) is one of the most complex urological procedures performed. Higher surgical volume has been found previously to be associated with better patient outcomes and reduced costs to the health care system. This has resulted in some regionalization of care toward high-volume facilities and providers; however, the preponderance of RPs is still performed at low-volume institutions. Objective: To provide an updated systematic review of the association of hospital and surgeon volume on patient and system outcomes after RP, including robot-assisted RP. Evidence acquisition: A systematic review of literature was undertaken, searching PubMed (1959-2016) for original articles. Selection criteria included RP, hospital and/or surgeon volumes as predictor variables, categorization of hospital and/or surgeon volumes, and measurable end points. Evidence synthesis: Overall 49 publications fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most of the studies demonstrated that higher-volume surgeries are associated with better outcomes including reduced mortality, morbidity, postoperative complications, length of stay, readmission, and cost-associated factors. The volume-outcome relationship is maintained in robotic surgery. Eleven studies assessed hospital and surgeon volume simultaneously, and findings reflect that neither is an independent predictor variable affecting outcomes. The studies varied in how volume cutoffs were categorized as well as how the volume-outcome relationship was methodologically evaluated. Conclusions: Contemporary evidence continues to support the relationship between high-volume surgeries with improved RP outcomes. Recent studies demonstrate that the volume-outcome relationship applies to robot-assisted RP and may be applied for potential cost savings in health care. An increase in the number of international studies suggests reproducibility of the association. Although regionalization of surgical care remains a contentious issue, there is an increasing body of evidence that short-term outcomes are improved at high-volume centers for RP. Patient summary: This systematic review of the latest literature found that higher surgical volume was associated with improved outcomes for radical prostatectomy. (C) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 789
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] ICU volume-outcome relationship: Is bigger better?
    Abbenbroek, B.
    Duffield, C.
    Elliott, D.
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2012, 25 (02) : 119 - 120
  • [42] Is the volume-outcome relationship sustained in psychiatric care?
    Lee, Hsin-Chien
    Lin, Herng-Ching
    SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 42 (08) : 669 - 672
  • [43] Is the volume-outcome relationship sustained in psychiatric care?
    Hsin-Chien Lee
    Herng-Ching Lin
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 2007, 42 : 669 - 672
  • [44] Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery
    Siragusa, L.
    Sensi, B.
    Vinci, D.
    Franceschilli, M.
    Pathirannehalage Don, C.
    Bagaglini, G.
    Bellato, V.
    Campanelli, M.
    Sica, G. S.
    DISCOVER ONCOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [45] Editorial: Volume-outcome relationship in adrenal surgery
    Wang, Tracy S.
    Duh, Quan-Yang
    SURGERY, 2018, 163 (01) : 165 - 166
  • [46] Transcending the volume-outcome relationship in cancer care
    Lipscomb, J
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (03): : 151 - 154
  • [47] Immunosuppression and Heterogeneity in the Sepsis Volume-Outcome Relationship
    Barbash, Ian J.
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2018, 15 (08) : 916 - 918
  • [48] Volume-outcome relationship in rectal cancer surgery
    L. Siragusa
    B. Sensi
    D. Vinci
    M. Franceschilli
    C. Pathirannehalage Don
    G. Bagaglini
    V. Bellato
    M. Campanelli
    G. S. Sica
    Discover Oncology, 12
  • [49] Overcoming bias in estimating the volume-outcome relationship
    Tsai, AC
    Votruba, M
    Bridges, JFP
    Cebul, RD
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 41 (01) : 252 - 264
  • [50] Trends in Volume-Outcome Relationship in Gastrectomies in Texas
    Ikoma, Naruhiko
    Kim, Bumyang
    Elting, Linda S.
    Shih, Ya-Chen Tina
    Badgwell, Brian D.
    Mansfield, Paul
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 26 (09) : 2694 - 2702