The role of IGCC in CO2 abatement

被引:13
|
作者
Pruschek, R
Oeljeklaus, G
Haupt, G
Zimmermann, G
Jansen, D
Ribberink, JS
机构
关键词
CO2; removal; IGCC power plant; CO shift reactor; Rectisol wash; efficiency calculations; coproduction; methanol synthesis; hydrogen source; CO2 emission figures;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00262-2
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
IGCC technology per se involves the potential of highest efficiencies, thus reducing the CO2 output accordingly. Moreover, the intermediate stage of synthesis gas makes it possible to remove most of the carbon compounds before combustion with acceptable additional auxiliary power demand. The separated CO2 stream is of highest purity and therefore suited for disposal e.g. in the deep sea or for reuse in chemical syntheses. So, methanol synthesis based on power plant CO2 has been investigated. This contribution presents the results of a pre-basic design for a coal-fired 300 MW-class IGCC power plant with methanol production using an external H-2 source. Based on a Siemens Model V94.3A gas turbine-generator, the standard IGCC has been equipped with plant components including CO shift reactors, CO2 scrubber, methanol synthesis reactors and distillation unit; additional investment costs amount to approx. 25 %. This concept is based solely on proven process engineering methods. Primary energy utilization as well as the resulting methanol production costs based on appropiate generating costs are discussed. Comparative CO2 emission figures make the advantage of such a coproduction process regarding this perfectly clear. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:S153 / S158
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] CO2 abatement from renewables in the German electricity sector: Does a CO2 price help?
    Weigt, Hannes
    Ellerman, Denny
    Delarue, Erik
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2013, 40 : S149 - S158
  • [42] Directed technical change and the adoption of CO2 abatement technology: The case of CO2 capture and storage
    Otto, Vincent M.
    Reilly, John
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2008, 30 (06) : 2879 - 2898
  • [43] CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost
    Chen, Chao
    Rubin, Edward S.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (03) : 915 - 924
  • [44] The problem of ranking CO2 abatement measures: A methodological proposal
    Luis Ponz-Tienda, Jose
    Prada-Hernandez, Andrea Victoria
    Salcedo-Bernal, Alejandro
    SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2016, 26 : 306 - 317
  • [45] Abatement of CO2 emission in the Chinese petroleum refining industry
    Du, Mingxian
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2015, 250
  • [46] Power sector reform and CO2 abatement costs in Korea
    Ahn, Young-Hwan
    Jeon, Wooyoung
    ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 131 : 202 - 214
  • [47] CO2 Abatement During Production of Low Carbon Cement
    Dutta, Bhaskar
    Maity, Soumen
    CALCINED CLAYS FOR SUSTAINABLE CONCRETE, 2015, 10 : 583 - 583
  • [48] Regional differences in China's CO2 abatement cost
    He, Xiaoping
    ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 80 : 145 - 152
  • [49] The Margin Abatement Costs of CO2 in Chinese industrial sectors
    Yuan Peng
    Liang Wenbo
    Cheng Shi
    2011 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN ENERGY ENGINEERING (ICAEE), 2012, 14 : 1792 - 1797
  • [50] Mashad trigeneration potential - An opportunity for CO2 abatement in Iran
    Kalhori, Sahand Behboodi
    Rabiei, Hossein
    Mansoori, Zohreh
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 60 : 106 - 114