CONSTITUTIONAL HOME RULE AND JUDICIAL SCRUTINY

被引：0

作者：

Baker, Lynn A. ^{[1
]}

Rodriguez, Daniel B. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Texas Sch Law, Austin, TX USA

来源：

DENVER UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW | 2009年 / 86卷 / 04期

关键词：

LOCAL-GOVERNMENT; MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS; DOCTRINE; COURT; CITY;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：1337 / 1424

页数：88

共 50 条

[21] INCREASED JUDICIAL SCRUTINY FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE CRIME
ALEXANDER, MD
[J]. CORNELL LAW REVIEW, 1992, 77 (03) : 612 - 649
[22] CONSTITUTIONAL AND JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION, AND THE UNDERSTANDING OF JUDICIAL SENTENCES
Rodriguez Alzate, Sergio
[J]. PROLEGOMENOS-DERECHOS Y VALORES, 2010, 13 (26): : 79 - 98
[23] Judicial Individualism and Judicial Disagreement in Constitutional Reasoning
Gyorfi, Tamas
Boda-Balogh, Eva
[J]. ICL JOURNAL-VIENNA JOURNAL ON INTERNATIONAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, 2020, 14 (03): : 231 - 251
[24] RETHINKING THE ROLE OF JUDICIAL SCRUTINY IN EMINENT DOMAIN
WILDER, MG
STIGTER, JE
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 1989, 55 (01) : 57 - 65
[25] WHAT EXACTLY IS THE PROBLEM WITH JUDICIAL SUPREMACY? RULE OF LAW, MORAL STANDING AND CONSTRUCTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
Einar Himma, Kenneth
[J]. RATIO JURIS, 2015, 10 (20): : 141 - 177
[26] APPORTIONMENT AND RIGHT TO VOTE - STANDARDS OF JUDICIAL SCRUTINY
CASPER, G
[J]. SUPREME COURT REVIEW, 1973, : 1 - 32
[27] ANTIGAY INITIATIVES - A CALL FOR HEIGHTENED JUDICIAL SCRUTINY
NIBLOCK, JF
[J]. UCLA LAW REVIEW, 1993, 41 (01) : 153 - 198
[28] Judicial Supremacy, Judicial Power, and the Finality of Constitutional Rulings
Lemieux, Scott E.
[J]. PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS, 2017, 15 (04) : 1067 - 1081
[29] Home rule for England, English nationalism, and Edwardian debates about constitutional reform
Peatling, GK
[J]. ALBION, 2003, 35 (01): : 71 - 90
[30] Judicial Activism of the Constitutional Tribunal
Banaszak, Boguslaw
[J]. PRZEGLAD SEJMOWY, 2009, (04): : 75 - 92

← 1 2 3 4 5 →